51 Sharon M, Taverner T, Ambroggio X I, et al. Structural organization of the 19S proteasome lid: insights from MS of intact complexes. PLoS Biol, 2006, 4: e267
[2]
52 Siddiqui S M, Sauer R T, Baker T A. Role of the processing pore of the ClpX AAA+ ATPase in the recognition and engagement of specific protein substrates. Genes Dev, 2004, 18: 369-374
[3]
53 Burton R E, Baker T A, Sauer R T. Energy-dependent degradation: Linkage between ClpX-catalyzed nucleotide hydrolysis and protein-substrate processing. Protein Sci, 2003, 12: 893-902
[4]
54 Groll M, Ditzel L, L？we J, et al. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution. Nature, 1997, 386: 463-471
[5]
55 L？we J, Stock D, Jap B, et al. Crystal structure of the 20S proteasome from the archaeon T. acidophilum at 3.4 A resolution. Science, 1995, 268: 533-539
[6]
56 Unno M, Mizushima T, Morimoto Y, et al. Structure determination of the constitutive 20S proteasome from bovine liver at 2.75 A resolution. J Biochem, 2002, 131: 171-173
[7]
57 Unno M, Mizushima T, Morimoto Y, et al. The structure of the mammalian 20S proteasome at 2.75 A resolution. Structure, 2002, 10: 609-618
[8]
58 Groll M, Berkers C R, Ploegh H L, et al. Crystal structure of the boronic acid-based proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in complex with the yeast 20S proteasome. Structure, 2006, 14: 451-456
[9]
59 Groll M, Huber R, Potts B C. Crystal structures of Salinosporamide A (NPI-0052) and B (NPI-0047) in complex with the 20S proteasome reveal important consequences of beta-lactone ring opening and a mechanism for irreversible binding. J Am Chem Soc, 2006, 128: 5136-5141
[10]
60 He J, Kulkarni K, da Fonseca P C, et al. The structure of the 26S proteasome subunit Rpn2 reveals its PC repeat domain as a closed toroid of two concentric alpha-helical rings. Structure, 2012, 20: p. 513-521
[11]
61 Pathare G R, Nagy I, Bohn S, et al. The proteasomal subunit Rpn6 is a molecular clamp holding the core and regulatory subcomplexes together. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2012, 109: 149-154
[12]
62 Boehringer J, Riedinger C, Paraskevopoulos K, et al. Structural and functional characterization of Rpn12 identifies residues required for Rpn10 proteasome incorporation. Biochem J, 2012, 448: 55-65
[13]
63 Bivona T G, Hieronymus H, Parker J, et al. FAS and NF-kappaB signalling modulate dependence of lung cancers on mutant EGFR. Nature, 2011, 471: 523-526
[14]
64 Satoh T, Saeki Y, Hiromoto T, et al. Structural basis for proteasome formation controlled by an assembly chaperone nas2. Structure, 2014, 22: 731-743
[15]
65 Takagi K, Kim S, Yukii H, et al. Structural basis for specific recognition of Rpt1p, an ATPase subunit of 26S proteasome, by proteasome-dedicated chaperone Hsm3p. J Biol Chem, 2012, 287: 12172-12182
[16]
49 Thompson D, Hakala K, DeMartino G N. Subcomplexes of PA700, the 19 S regulator of the 26 S proteasome, reveal relative roles of AAA subunits in 26 S proteasome assembly and activation and ATPase activity. J Biol Chem, 2009, 284: 24891-24903
[17]
50 Imai J, Maruya M, Yashiroda H, et al. The molecular chaperone Hsp90 plays a role in the assembly and maintenance of the 26S proteasome. EMBO J, 2003, 22: 3557-3567
[18]
30 Guo F, Maurizi M R, Esser L. Crystal structure of ClpA, an Hsp100 chaperone and regulator of ClpAP protease. J Biol Chem, 2002, 277: 46743-46752
[19]
31 Glynn S E, Martin A, Nager A R, et al. Structures of asymmetric ClpX hexamers reveal nucleotide-dependent motions in a AAA+ protein-unfolding machine. Cell, 2009, 139: 744-756
[20]
32 Zhang F, Hu M, Tian G, et al. Structural insights into the regulatory particle of the proteasome from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii. Mol Cell, 2009, 34: 473-484
[21]
33 Szyk A, Maurizi M R. Crystal structure at 1.9A of E. coli ClpP with a peptide covalently bound at the active site. J Struct Biol, 2006, 156: 165-174
[22]
34 Rohrwild M, Coux O, Huang H C, et al. HslV-HslU: a novel ATP-dependent protease complex in Escherichia coli related to the eukaryotic proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1996, 93: 5808-581
[23]
35 Kusmierczyk A R, Hochstrasser M. Some assembly required: dedicated chaperones in eukaryotic proteasome biogenesis. Biol Chem, 2008, 389: 1143-1151
[24]
36 Tomko R J Jr, Hochstrasser M. Order of the proteasomal ATPases and eukaryotic proteasome assembly. Cell Biochem Biophys, 2011, 60: 13-20
[25]
37 Kusmierczyk A R, Kunjappu M J, Kim R Y, et al. A conserved 20S proteasome assembly factor requires a C-terminal HbYX motif for proteasomal precursor binding. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2011, 18: 622-629
[26]
38 Yashiroda H, Mizushima T, Okamoto K, et al. Crystal structure of a chaperone complex that contributes to the assembly of yeast 20S proteasomes. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2008, 15: 228-236
[27]
39 Hirano Y, Hendil K B, Yashiroda H, et al. A heterodimeric complex that promotes the assembly of mammalian 20S proteasomes. Nature, 2005, 437: 1381-1385
[28]
40 Le Tallec B, Barrault M B, Courbeyrette R, et al. 20S proteasome assembly is orchestrated by two distinct pairs of chaperones in yeast and in mammals. Mol Cell, 2007, 27: 660-674
[29]
41 Li X, Kusmierczyk A R, Wong P, et al. beta-Subunit appendages promote 20S proteasome assembly by overcoming an Ump1-dependent checkpoint. EMBO J, 2007, 26: 2339-2349
[30]
42 Hirano Y, Hayashi H, Iemura S, et al. Cooperation of multiple chaperones required for the assembly of mammalian 20S proteasomes. Mol Cell, 2006, 24: 977984
[31]
43 Hirano Y, Kaneko T, Okamoto K, et al. Dissecting beta-ring assembly pathway of the mammalian 20S proteasome. EMBO J, 2008, 27: 2204-2213
[32]
44 Saeki Y, Toh-E A, Kudo T, et al. Multiple proteasome-interacting proteins assist the assembly of the yeast 19S regulatory particle. Cell, 2009, 137: 900-913
[33]
45 Le Tallec B, Barrault M B, Guérois R, et al. Hsm3/S5b participates in the assembly pathway of the 19S regulatory particle of the proteasome. Mol Cell, 2009,33: 389-399
[34]
46 Funakoshi M, Tomko R J Jr, Kobayashi H, et al. Multiple assembly chaperones govern biogenesis of the proteasome regulatory particle base. Cell, 2009, 137: 887-899
[35]
47 Roelofs J, Park S, Haas W, et al. Chaperone-mediated pathway of proteasome regulatory particle assembly. Nature, 2009, 459: 861-865
[36]
48 Park S1, Roelofs J, Kim W, et al. Hexameric assembly of the proteasomal ATPases is templated through their C termini. Nature, 2009, 459: 866-870
[37]
1 Finley D. Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. Annu Rev Biochem, 2009, 78: 477-513
[38]
2 Ravid T, Hochstrasser M. Diversity of degradation signals in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2008, 9: 679-690.
[39]
3 Tomko R J Jr, Hochstrasser M. Molecular architecture and assembly of the eukaryotic proteasome. Annu Rev Biochem, 2013, 82: 415-445
[40]
4 Lee B H, Lee M J, Park S, et al. Enhancement of proteasome activity by a small-molecule inhibitor of USP14. Nature, 2010, 467: 179-184
[41]
5 Dobbelstein M, Moll U. Targeting tumour-supportive cellular machineries in anticancer drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2014, 13: 179-196
[42]
6 Spataro V, Norbury C, Harris A L. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in cancer. Br J Cancer, 1998, 77: 448-455
[43]
7 Bakowska-Zywicka K, Twardowski T. Structure and function of the eukaryotic ribosome. Postepy Biochem, 2008, 54: 251-263
[44]
8 Etlinger J D, Goldberg A L. A soluble ATP-dependent proteolytic system responsible for the degradation of abnormal proteins in reticulocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1977, 74: 54-58
[45]
9 Ciechanover A, Heller H, Elias S, et al. ATP-dependent conjugation of reticulocyte proteins with the polypeptide required for protein degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U SA, 1980, 77: 1365-1368.
[46]
10 Tanaka K, Ii K, Ichihara A, et al. A high molecular weight protease in the cytosol of rat liver. I. Purification, enzymological properties, and tissue distribution. J Biol Chem, 1986, 261: 15197-15203
[47]
11 Waxman L, Fagan J M, Goldberg A L. Demonstration of two distinct high molecular weight proteases in rabbit reticulocytes, one of which degrades ubiquitin conjugates. J Biol Chem, 1987, 262: 2451-2457
[48]
12 Hough R, Pratt G, Rechsteiner M. Purification of two high molecular weight proteases from rabbit reticulocyte lysate. J Biol Chem, 1987, 262: 8303-8313
[49]
13 Glickman M H, Rubin D M, Coux O. A subcomplex of the proteasome regulatory particle required for ubiquitin-conjugate degradation and related to the COP9-signalosome and eIF3. Cell, 1998, 94: 615-623
[50]
14 Yao T, Cohen RE. A cryptic protease couples deubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome. Nature, 2002, 419: 403-407
[51]
15 Verma R, Aravind L, Oania R. Role of Rpn11 metalloprotease in deubiquitination and degradation by the 26S proteasome. Science, 2002, 298: 611-615
[52]
16 Pathare G R, Nagy I, ？led？ P. Crystal structure of the proteasomal deubiquitylation module Rpn8-Rpn11. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2014, 111: 2984-2989
[53]
17 Worden E J, Padovani C, Martin A. Structure of the Rpn11-Rpn8 dimer reveals mechanisms of substrate deubiquitination during proteasomal degradation. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2014, 21: 220-227
[54]
18 Liu C W, Jacobson A D. Functions of the 19S complex in proteasomal degradation. Trends Biochem Sci, 2013, 38: 103-110
[55]
19 Bhattacharyya S, Yu H, Mim C. Regulated protein turnover: snapshots of the proteasome in action. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2014, 15: 122-133
[56]
20 F？rster F, Unverdorben P, Sled？ P. Unveiling the long-held secrets of the 26S proteasome. Structure, 2013, 21: 1551-1562
[57]
21 Tomko R J Jr, Funakoshi M, Schneider K, et al. Heterohexameric ring arrangement of the eukaryotic proteasomal ATPases: implications for proteasome structure and assembly. Mol Cell, 2010, 38: 393-403
[58]
22 Coux O, Tanaka K, Goldberg AL. Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. Annu Rev Biochem, 1996, 65: p. 801-847
[59]
23 Stadtmueller B M, Hill C P. Proteasome activators. Mol Cell, 2011, 41: 8-19
[60]
24 Kish-Trier E, Hill C P. Structural biology of the proteasome. Annu Rev Biophys, 2013, 42: 29-49
[61]
25 Barthelme D, Sauer R T. Identification of the Cdc48*20S proteasome as an ancient AAA+ proteolytic machine. Science, 2012, 337: 843-846
[62]
26 Barthelme D, Sauer RT. Bipartite determinants mediate an evolutionarily conserved interaction between Cdc48 and the 20S peptidase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2013, 110: 3327-3332
[63]
27 Barthelme D, Chen J Z, Grabenstatter J. Architecture and assembly of the archaeal Cdc48*20S proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2014, 111: E1687-1694
[64]
28 Wang F, Mei Z, Qi Y, et al. Structure and mechanism of the hexameric MecA-ClpC molecular machine. Nature, 2011, 471: 331-335
[65]
29 Zhang F, Wu Z, Zhang P, et al. Mechanism of substrate unfolding and translocation by the regulatory particle of the proteasome from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii. Mol Cell, 2009, 34: 485-496
[66]
66 Nakamura Y, Umehara T, Tanaka A, et al. Structural basis for the recognition between the regulatory particles Nas6 and Rpt3 of the yeast 26S proteasome. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2007, 359: 503-509
[67]
67 Kim S, Saeki Y, Fukunaga K, et al. Crystal structure of yeast rpn14, a chaperone of the 19 S regulatory particle of the proteasome. J Biol Chem, 2010, 285: 15159-15166
[68]
68 Kim S, Nishide A, Saeki Y, et al. New crystal structure of the proteasome-dedicated chaperone Rpn14 at 1.6 A resolution. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun, 2012, 68: 517-521
[69]
69 Bohn S, Beck F, Sakata E, et al. Structure of the 26S proteasome from Schizosaccharomyces pombe at subnanometer resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107: 20992-20997
[70]
70 Sakata E, Bohn S, Mihalache O, et al. Localization of the proteasomal ubiquitin receptors Rpn10 and Rpn13 by electron cryomicroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2012, 109: 1479-1484
[71]
71 Lander G C, Estrin E, Matyskiela M E, et al. Complete subunit architecture of the proteasome regulatory particle. Nature, 2012, 482: 186-191
[72]
72 Enemark E J, Joshua-Tor L. Mechanism of DNA translocation in a replicative hexameric helicase. Nature, 2006, 442: 270-275
[73]
73 Thomsen ND, Berger JM. Running in reverse: the structural basis for translocation polarity in hexameric helicases. Cell, 2009, 139: 523-534
[74]
74 Lasker K, F？rster F, Bohn S, et al. Molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome holocomplex determined by an integrative approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2012, 109: 1380-1387
[75]
75 Beck F, Unverdorben P, Bohn S, et al. Near-atomic resolution structural model of the yeast 26S proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2012, 109: 14870-14875
[76]
76 Gillette T G, Kumar B, Thompson D, et al. Differential roles of the COOH termini of AAA subunits of PA700 (19S regulator) in asymmetric assembly and activation of the 26 S proteasome. J Biol Chem, 2008, 283: 31813-31822
[77]
77 Smith D M, Chang S C, Park S, et al. Docking of the proteasomal ATPases’ carboxyl termini in the 20S proteasome’s alpha ring opens the gate for substrate entry. Mol Cell, 2007, 27: 731-744
[78]
78 Tian G, Park S, Lee M J, et al. An asymmetric interface between the regulatory and core particles of the proteasome. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2011, 18: 1259-1267
[79]
79 ？led？ P, Unverdorben P, Beck F, et al. Structure of the 26S proteasome with ATP-gammaS bound provides insights into the mechanism of nucleotide-dependent substrate translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2013, 110: 7264-7269
[80]
80 Matyskiela M E, Lander G C, Martin A. Conformational switching of the 26S proteasome enables substrate degradation. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2013, 20: 781-788Unverdorben P, Beck F, ？led？ P, et al. Deep classification of a large cryo-EM dataset defines the conformational landscape of the 26S proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2014, 111: 5544-5549
