1 den Ouden H E M, Frith U, Frith C, et al. Thinking about intentions. Neuroimage, 2005, 28: 787-796
[2]
2 Satpute A B, Fenker D B, Waldmann M R, et al. An fMRI study of causal judgments. Eur J Neurosci, 2005, 22: 1233-1238
[3]
3 Bara B G. Cognitive Pragmatics: Mental Processes of Communication. Boston: MIT Press, 2007
[4]
4 Cacippo J T, Berntson G G, Decety J. Social neuroscience and its relationship to social psychology. Soc Cogn, 2010, 28: 675-685
[5]
5 Rizzolatti G, Sinigaglia C. Further reflections on how we interpret the actions of others. Nature, 2008, 455: 589
[6]
6 Wang Y W, Ling C D, Yuan B, et al. Person perception precedes theory of mind: an event related potential analysis. Neuroscience, 2010, 170: 238-246
[7]
7 Wang Y W, Zheng Y W, Lin C D, et al. Electrophysiological correlates of reading the single- and interactive-mind. Front Hum Neurosci, 2011, 5: 64
[8]
8 Wang Y W, Huang L, Lin C D, et al. Spatio-temporal brain dynamics of understanding social versus private intentions: an electrical neuroimaging study. Neuroquantology, 2012, 10: 733-743
[9]
9 Grafton S T. Embodied cognition and the simulation of action tounderstand others. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2009, 1156: 97-117
[10]
10 Ortigue S, Sinigaglia C, Rizzolatti G, et al. Understanding actions of others: the electrodynamics of the left and right hemispheres. A high-density EEG neuroimaging study. PLoS One, 2010, 5: e12160
[11]
11 Garbarini F, Adenzato M. At the root of embodied cognition: cognitive science meets neurophysiology. Brain Cogn, 2004, 56: 100-106
[12]
12 Niedenthal P M. Embodying emotion. Science, 2007, 316: 1002-1005
[13]
13 Jackson P L, Decety J. Motor cognition: a new paradigm to study self-other interactions. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2004, 14: 259-263
[14]
14 Frith C. Attention to action and awareness of other minds. Conscious Cogn, 2002, 11: 481-487
[15]
15 Aglioti S M, Cesari P, Romani M, et al. Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nat Neurosci, 2008, 11: 1109-1116
[16]
16 Grafton S T, Schmitt P, Van Horn J, et al. Neural substrates of visuomotor learning based on improved feedback control andprediction. Neuroimage, 2008, 39: 1383-1395
[17]
17 Ortigue S, Thompson J C, Parasuraman R, et al. Spatio-temporal dynamics of human intention understanding in temporo-parietal cortex: a combined EEG/fMRI repetition suppression paradigm. PLoS One, 2009, 4: e6962
[18]
18 Van Overwalle F, Baetens K. Understanding others'' actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing system: a meta-analysis. Neuroimage, 2009, 48: 564-584
[19]
19 Centelles L, Assaiante C, Nazarian B, et al. Recruitment of both the mirror and the mentalizing networks when observing the social interactions depicted by point-lights: a neuroimaging study. PLoS One, 2011, 6: e15749
[20]
20 Pelphrey K A, Morris J P, McCarthy G. Grasping the intentions of others: the perceived intentionality of an action influences activity in the superior temporal sulcus during social perception. J Cogn Neurosci, 2004, 16: 1706-1716
[21]
21 Iacoboni M, Molnar-Szakacs I, Gallese V, et al. Grasping the intentions of others with one''s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biol, 2005, 3: e79
[22]
22 Brass M, Schmitt R M, Spengler S, et al. Investigating action understanding: inferential process versus action simulation. Curr Biol, 2007, 17: 2117-2121
[23]
23 Frith C D, Frith U. Interacting minds-a biological basis. Science, 1999, 286: 1692-1695
[24]
24 Decety J, Michalska K J, Akitsuki Y. Who caused the pain? An fMRI investigation of empathy and intentionality in children. Neuropsychologia, 2008, 46: 2607-2614
[25]
25 Sinke C B A, Sorger B, Goebel R, et al. Tease or threat? Judging social interactions from bodily expressions. Neuroimage, 2010, 49: 1717-1727
[26]
26 Redcay E. The superior temporal sulcus performs a common function for social and speech perception: implications for the emergence of autism. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2008, 32: 123-142
[27]
27 Bahnemann M, Dziobek I, Prehn K, et al. Sociology in the temporoparietal cortex: common versus distinct process. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 2010, 5: 48-58
29 Liu D, Sabbag M A, Gehring W J, et al. Decoupling beliefs from reality in the brain: an ERP study of theory of mind. Neuroreport, 2004, 15: 991-995
[30]
30 Proverbio A M, Riva F, Paganelli L, et al. Neural coding of cooperative vs. affective human interactions: 150 ms to code the action''s purpose. PLoS One, 2011, 6: e22026.
[31]
31 Moser J S, Huppert J D, Duval E, et al. Face processing biases in social anxiety: anelectrophysiological study. Biol Psychol, 2008, 78: 93-103
[32]
32 Sewell C, Palermo R, Atkinson C, et al. Anxiety and the neural processing of threat in faces. Neuroreport, 2008, 19: 1339-1343
[33]
33 Wieser M J, McTeague L M, Keil A. Sustained preferential processing of social threat cues: bias without competition. J Cogn Neurosci, 2011, 23: 1973-1986
[34]
34 Baron-Cohen S, Leslie A M, Frith U. Mechanical, behavioral and intentional understanding of picture stories in autistic children. Brit J Dev Psychol, 1986, 4: 113-125
[35]
35 Brunet E, Sarfati Y, Hardy-Baylé M C, et al. A PET investigation of the attribution of intentions with a nonverbal task. Neuroimage, 2000, 11: 157-166
[36]
36 Brunet E, Sarfati Y, Hardy-Baylé M C. Reasoning about physicalcausality and other''s intentions in schizophrenia. Cogn Neuropsychiatry, 2003, 8: 129-139
[37]
37 Walter H, Adenzato M, Ciaramidaro A, et al. Understanding intentions in social interaction: the role of the anterior paracingulate cortex. J Cogn Neurosci, 2004, 16: 1854-1863
[38]
38 Walter H, Ciaramidaro A, Adenzato M, et al. Dysfunction of the social brain in schizophrenia ismodulated by intention type: an fMRI study. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 2009, 4: 166-176
[39]
39 Ciaramidaro A, Adenzato M, Enrici I, et al. The intentional network: how the brain reads varieties of intentions. Neuropsychologia, 2007, 45: 3105-3113
[40]
40 Picton T W, Bentin S, Berg P, et al. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology, 2000, 37: 127-152
[41]
41 Liu D, Meltzoff A N, Wellman H M. Neural correlates of belief- and desire-reasoning. Child Dev, 2009, 80: 1163-1171
[42]
42 Ybarra O, Chan E, Park D C. Young and old adults'' concerns about morality and competence. Motiv Emot, 2001, 25: 85-100
[43]
43 Proverbio A M, Riva F. RP and N400 ERP components reflect semantic violations in visual processing of human actions. Neurosci Lett, 2009, 459: 142-146
[44]
44 Proverbio A M, Riva F, Zani A. When neurons do not mirror the agent''s intentions: sex differences in neural coding of goal-directed actions. Neuropsychologia, 2010, 48: 1454-1463
[45]
45 Weymar M, Bradley M M, Hamm A O, et al. When fear forms memories: threat of shock and brain potentials during encoding and recognition. Cortex, 2013, 49: 819-826
[46]
46 Hirai M, Kahigi R. Differential orientation effect in the neural response to interacting biological motion of two agents. BMC Neurosci, 2009, 10: 39
[47]
47 van''t Wount M, Sanfey A G. Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making. Cognition, 2008, 108: 796-803
[48]
48 Carter E J, Pelphrey K A. Friend or foe? Brain systems involved in the perception of dynamic signals of menacing and friendly social approaches. Soc Neurosci, 2008, 3: 151-163
[49]
49 Vrticka P, Andersson F, Sander D. Memory for friends or foes: the social context of past encounters with faces modulates their subsequent neural traces in the brain. Soc Neurosci, 2009, 4: 384-401
[50]
50 Guroglu B, Haselager G J T, van Liershout C F M, et al. Why are friends special? Implementing a social interaction simulation task to probe the neural correlates of friendship. Neuroimage, 2008, 39: 903-910
[51]
51 Wang Y W, Zheng Y W, Shen D L, et al. Reading another''s mind and Reading the interactive mind from Chinese idioms: evidience from eye-movements and ERPs. Acta Psychol Sin, 2012, 44: 100-111
[52]
52 Kounios J, Holcomb P J. Structure and process in semantic memory: evidence from event-related brain potentials and reaction times. J Exp Psychol Gen, 1992, 121: 459-479
[53]
53 Wu Y, Zhou X L. The Context-dependency of fairness processing: evidence from ERP study. Acta Psychologica Since, 2012, 44: 797-806
