全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS Genetics  2015 

Sae2 Function at DNA Double-Strand Breaks Is Bypassed by Dampening Tel1 or Rad53 Activity

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005685

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The MRX complex together with Sae2 initiates resection of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to generate single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) that triggers homologous recombination. The absence of Sae2 not only impairs DSB resection, but also causes prolonged MRX binding at the DSBs that leads to persistent Tel1- and Rad53-dependent DNA damage checkpoint activation and cell cycle arrest. Whether this enhanced checkpoint signaling contributes to the DNA damage sensitivity and/or the resection defect of sae2Δ cells is not known. By performing a genetic screen, we identify rad53 and tel1 mutant alleles that suppress both the DNA damage hypersensitivity and the resection defect of sae2Δ cells through an Sgs1-Dna2-dependent mechanism. These suppression events do not involve escaping the checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest. Rather, defective Rad53 or Tel1 signaling bypasses Sae2 function at DSBs by decreasing the amount of Rad9 bound at DSBs. As a consequence, reduced Rad9 association to DNA ends relieves inhibition of Sgs1-Dna2 activity, which can then compensate for the lack of Sae2 in DSB resection and DNA damage resistance. We propose that persistent Tel1 and Rad53 checkpoint signaling in cells lacking Sae2 increases the association of Rad9 at DSBs, which in turn inhibits DSB resection by limiting the activity of the Sgs1-Dna2 resection machinery.

References

[1]  Gobbini E, Cesena D, Galbiati A, Lockhart A, Longhese MP (2013) Interplays between ATM/Tel1 and ATR/Mec1 in sensing and signaling DNA double-strand breaks. DNA Repair 12: 791–799. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.07.009. pmid:23953933
[2]  Ciccia A, Elledge SJ (2010) The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol Cell 40: 179–204. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019. pmid:20965415
[3]  Mehta A, Haber JE (2014) Sources of DNA double-strand breaks and models of recombinational DNA repair. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 6: a016428. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016428. pmid:25104768
[4]  Symington LS, Gautier J (2011) Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu Rev Genet 45: 247–271. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132435. pmid:21910633
[5]  Cannavo E, Cejka P (2014) Sae2 promotes dsDNA endonuclease activity within Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 to resect DNA breaks. Nature 514: 122–125. doi: 10.1038/nature13771. pmid:25231868
[6]  Mimitou EP, Symington LS (2008) Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455: 770–774. doi: 10.1038/nature07312. pmid:18806779
[7]  Zhu Z, Chung WH, Shim EY, Lee SE, Ira G (2008) Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134: 981–994. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.037. pmid:18805091
[8]  Cejka P, Cannavo E, Polaczek P, Masuda-Sasa T, Pokharel S, Campbell JL, et al. (2010) DNA end resection by Dna2-Sgs1-RPA and its stimulation by Top3-Rmi1 and Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2. Nature 467: 112–116. doi: 10.1038/nature09355. pmid:20811461
[9]  Niu H, Chung WH, Zhu Z, Kwon Y, Zhao W, Chi P, et al. (2010) Mechanism of the ATP-dependent DNA end-resection machinery from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 467: 108–111. doi: 10.1038/nature09318. pmid:20811460
[10]  Shim EY, Chung WH, Nicolette ML, Zhang Y, Davis M, Zhu Z, et al. (2010) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 and Ku proteins regulate association of Exo1 and Dna2 with DNA breaks. EMBO J 29: 3370–3380. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.219. pmid:20834227
[11]  Mimitou EP, Symington LS (2010) Ku prevents Exo1 and Sgs1-dependent resection of DNA ends in the absence of a functional MRX complex or Sae2. EMBO J 29: 3358–3369. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.193. pmid:20729809
[12]  Foster SS, Balestrini A, Petrini JH (2011) Functional interplay of the Mre11 nuclease and Ku in the response to replication-associated DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 31: 4379–4389. doi: 10.1128/MCB.05854-11. pmid:21876003
[13]  Bonetti D, Villa M, Gobbini E, Cassani C, Tedeschi G, Longhese MP (2015) Escape of Sgs1 from Rad9 inhibition reduces the requirement for Sae2 and functional MRX in DNA end resection. EMBO Rep 16: 351–361. doi: 10.15252/embr.201439764. pmid:25637499
[14]  Ferrari M, Dibitetto D, De Gregorio G, Eapen VV, Rawal CC, Lazzaro F, et al. (2015) Functional interplay between the 53BP1-ortholog Rad9 and the Mre11 complex regulates resection, end-tethering and repair of a double-strand break. PLoS Genet 11: e1004928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004928. pmid:25569305
[15]  Keeney S, Kleckner N (1995) Covalent protein-DNA complexes at the 5' strand termini of meiosis-specific double-strand breaks in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 11274–11278. pmid:7479978 doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.24.11274
[16]  Usui T, Ohta T, Oshiumi H, Tomizawa J, Ogawa H, Ogawa T (1998) Complex formation and functional versatility of Mre11 of budding yeast in recombination. Cell 95: 705–716. pmid:9845372 doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81640-2
[17]  Liu C, Pouliot JJ, Nash HA (2002) Repair of topoisomerase I covalent complexes in the absence of the tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase Tdp1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 14970–14975. pmid:12397185 doi: 10.1073/pnas.182557199
[18]  Deng C, Brown JA, You D, Brown JM (2005) Multiple endonucleases function to repair covalent topoisomerase I complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 170: 591–600. pmid:15834151 doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.028795
[19]  Mantiero D, Clerici M, Lucchini G, Longhese MP (2007) Dual role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tel1 in the checkpoint response to double-strand breaks. EMBO Rep 8: 380–387. pmid:17347674 doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400911
[20]  Usui T, Ogawa H, Petrini JH (2001) A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Mol Cell 7: 1255–1266. pmid:11430828 doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00270-2
[21]  Lisby M, Barlow JH, Burgess RC, Rothstein R (2004) Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118: 699–713. pmid:15369670 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.08.015
[22]  Clerici M, Mantiero D, Lucchini G, Longhese MP (2006) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein negatively regulates DNA damage checkpoint signalling. EMBO Rep 7: 212–218. pmid:16374511 doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400593
[23]  Chen H, Donnianni RA, Handa N, Deng SK, Oh J, Timashev LA, et al. (2015) Sae2 promotes DNA damage resistance by removing the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex from DNA and attenuating Rad53 signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: 1880–1887. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503331112
[24]  Puddu F, Oelschlaegel T, Guerini I, Geisler NJ, Niu H, Herzog M, et al. (2015) Synthetic viability genomic screening defines Sae2 function in DNA repair. EMBO J 34: 1509–1522. doi: 10.15252/embj.201590973. pmid:25899817
[25]  Sandell LL, Zakian VA (1993) Loss of a yeast telomere: arrest, recovery, and chromosome loss. Cell 75: 729–739. pmid:8242745 doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90493-a
[26]  Toczyski DP, Galgoczy DJ, Hartwell LH (1997) CDC5 and CKII control adaptation to the yeast DNA damage checkpoint. Cell 90: 1097–1106. pmid:9323137 doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80375-x
[27]  Lee SE, Moore JK, Holmes A, Umezu K, Kolodner RD, Haber JE (1998) Saccharomyces Ku70, Mre11/Rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94: 399–409. pmid:9708741 doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81482-8
[28]  Fukunaga K, Kwon Y, Sung P, Sugimoto K (2011) Activation of protein kinase Tel1 through recognition of protein-bound DNA ends. Mol Cell Biol 31: 1959–1971. doi: 10.1128/MCB.05157-11. pmid:21402778
[29]  Sun Z, Hsiao J, Fay DS, Stern DF (1998) Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint. Science 281: 272–274. pmid:9657725 doi: 10.1126/science.281.5374.272
[30]  Gilbert CS, Green CM, Lowndes NF (2001) Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine. Mol Cell 8: 129–136. pmid:11511366 doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00267-2
[31]  Sweeney FD, Yang F, Chi A, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF, Durocher D (2005) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 acts as a Mec1 adaptor to allow Rad53 activation. Curr Biol 15: 1364–1375. pmid:16085488 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.063
[32]  Durocher D, Henckel J, Fersht AR, Jackson SP (1999) The FHA domain is a modular phosphopeptide recognition motif. Mol Cell 4: 387–394. pmid:10518219 doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80340-8
[33]  Bosotti R, Isacchi A, Sonnhammer EL (2000) FAT: a novel domain in PIK-related kinases. Trends Biochem Sci 25: 225–227. pmid:10782091 doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)01563-2
[34]  Bareti? D, Williams RL (2014) PIKKs—the solenoid nest where partners and kinases meet. Curr Opin Struct Biol 29: 134–142. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.11.003. pmid:25460276
[35]  Mallory JC, Petes TD (2000) Protein kinase activity of Tel1p and Mec1p, two Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins related to the human ATM protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 13749–13754. pmid:11095737 doi: 10.1073/pnas.250475697
[36]  Ogi H, Goto GH, Ghosh A, Zencir S, Henry E, Sugimoto K (2015) Requirement of the FATC domain of protein kinase Tel1 for localization to DNA ends and target protein recognition. Mol Biol Cell 26: 3480–3488. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E15-05-0259. pmid:26246601
[37]  Lydall D, Weinert T (1995) Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: implications for repair and arrest. Science 270: 1488–1491. pmid:7491494 doi: 10.1126/science.270.5241.1488
[38]  Jia X, Weinert T, Lydall D (2004) Mec1 and Rad53 inhibit formation of single-stranded DNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants. Genetics 166: 753–764. pmid:15020465 doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.2.753
[39]  Ngo GH, Lydall D (2015) The 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp coordinates resection at DNA double strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res 43: 5017–5032. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv409. pmid:25925573
[40]  Pellicioli A, Lee SE, Lucca C, Foiani M, Haber JE (2001) Regulation of Saccharomyces Rad53 checkpoint kinase during adaptation from DNA damage-induced G2/M arrest. Mol Cell 7: 293–300. pmid:11239458 doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00177-0
[41]  Sanchez Y, Bachant J, Wang H, Hu F, Liu D, Tetzlaff M, et al. (1999) Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by Chk1 and Rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 286: 1166–1171. pmid:10550056 doi: 10.1126/science.286.5442.1166
[42]  Vaze MB, Pellicioli A, Lee SE, Ira G, Liberi G, Arbel-Eden A, et al. (2002) Recovery from checkpoint-mediated arrest after repair of a double-strand break requires Srs2 helicase. Mol Cell 10: 373–385. pmid:12191482 doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00593-2
[43]  Clerici M, Trovesi C, Galbiati A, Lucchini G, Longhese MP (2014) Mec1/ATR regulates the generation of single-stranded DNA that attenuates Tel1/ATM signaling at DNA ends. EMBO J 33: 198–216. doi: 10.1002/embj.201386041. pmid:24357557
[44]  Morin I, Ngo HP, Greenall A, Zubko MK, Morrice N, Lydall D (2008) Checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates the DNA damage response. EMBO J 27: 2400–2410. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.171. pmid:18756267
[45]  Budd ME, Choe Wc, Campbell JL (2000) The nuclease activity of the yeast DNA2 protein, which is related to the RecB-like nucleases, is essential in vivo. J Biol Chem 275: 16518–16529. pmid:10748138 doi: 10.1074/jbc.m909511199
[46]  Zhao X, Muller EG, Rothstein R (1998) A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol Cell 2: 329–340. pmid:9774971 doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80277-4
[47]  Fay DS, Sun Z, Stern DF (1997) Mutations in SPK1/RAD53 that specifically abolish checkpoint but not growth-related functions. Curr Genet 31: 97–105. pmid:9021124 doi: 10.1007/s002940050181
[48]  Baldo V, Testoni V, Lucchini G, Longhese MP (2008) Dominant TEL1-hy mutations compensate for Mec1 lack of functions in the DNA damage response. Mol Cell Biol 28: 358–375. pmid:17954565 doi: 10.1128/mcb.01214-07
[49]  Hirano Y, Fukunaga K, Sugimoto K (2009) Rif1 and Rif2 inhibit localization of Tel1 to DNA ends. Mol Cell 33: 312–322. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.12.027. pmid:19217405
[50]  Shroff R, Arbel-Eden A, Pilch D, Ira G, Bonner WM, Petrini JH, et al. (2004) Distribution and dynamics of chromatin modification induced by a defined DNA double-strand break. Curr Biol 14: 1703–1711. pmid:15458641 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.047
[51]  Javaheri A, Wysocki R, Jobin-Robitaille O, Altaf M, C?té J, Kron SJ (2006) Yeast G1 DNA damage checkpoint regulation by H2A phosphorylation is independent of chromatin remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 13771–13776. pmid:16940359 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0511192103
[52]  Toh GW, O'Shaughnessy AM, Jimeno S, Dobbie IM, Grenon M, Maffini S, et al. (2006) Histone H2A phosphorylation and H3 methylation are required for a novel Rad9 DSB repair function following checkpoint activation. DNA Repair 5: 693–703. pmid:16650810 doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.03.005
[53]  Hammet A, Magill C, Heierhorst J, Jackson SP (2007) Rad9 BRCT domain interaction with phosphorylated H2AX regulates the G1 checkpoint in budding yeast. EMBO Rep 8: 851–857. pmid:17721446 doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401036
[54]  Bernstein KA, Mimitou EP, Mihalevic MJ, Chen H, Sunjaveric I, Symington LS et al. (2013) Resection activity of the Sgs1 helicase alters the affinity of DNA ends for homologous recombination proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 195: 1241–1251. doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.157370. pmid:24097410
[55]  Ira G, Haber JE (2002) Characterization of RAD51-independent break-induced replication that acts preferentially with short homologous sequences. Mol Cell Biol 22: 6384–6392. pmid:12192038 doi: 10.1128/mcb.22.18.6384-6392.2002
[56]  Jinks-Robertson S, Michelitch M, Ramcharan S (1993) Substrate length requirements for efficient mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 13: 3937–3950. pmid:8321201 doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.7.3937
[57]  Naiki T, Wakayama T, Nakada D, Matsumoto K, Sugimoto K (2004) Association of Rad9 with double-strand breaks through a Mec1-dependent mechanism. Mol Cell Biol 24: 3277–3285. pmid:15060150 doi: 10.1128/mcb.24.8.3277-3285.2004
[58]  Usui T, Foster SS, Petrini JH (2009) Maintenance of the DNA-damage checkpoint requires DNA-damage-induced mediator protein oligomerization. Mol Cell 33: 147–159. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.12.022. pmid:19187758
[59]  Hegnauer AM, Hustedt N, Shimada K, Pike BL, Vogel M, Amsler P, et al. (2012) An N-terminal acidic region of Sgs1 interacts with Rpa70 and recruits Rad53 kinase to stalled forks. EMBO J 31: 3768–3783. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.195. pmid:22820947
[60]  Emili A (1998) MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell 2: 183–189. pmid:9734355 doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80128-8
[61]  Vialard JE, Gilbert CS, Green CM, Lowndes NF (1998) The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage. EMBO J 17: 5679–5688. pmid:9755168 doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.19.5679
[62]  Cremona CA, Behrens A (2014) ATM signalling and cancer. Oncogene 33: 3351–3360. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.275. pmid:23851492
[63]  Trovesi C, Falcettoni M, Lucchini G, Clerici M, Longhese MP (2011) Distinct Cdk1 requirements during single-strand annealing, noncrossover, and crossover recombination. PLoS Genet 7: e1002263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002263. pmid:21901114
[64]  Viscardi V, Bonetti D, Cartagena-Lirola H, Lucchini G, Longhese MP (2007) MRX-dependent DNA damage response to short telomeres. Mol Biol Cell 18: 3047–3058. pmid:17538011 doi: 10.1091/mbc.e07-03-0285

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133