Graphene oxide (GO) was prepared by modified Hummer’s method, and chemically converted graphene (CCG) was prepared by further reduction of the aqueous GO colloid. The effect of pH on particle size, particle charge, and light absorption of the aqueous colloids of GO and CCG was studied with titration against HCl or NaOH, to find the ideal characteristics for a stable dispersion. The GO colloid was stable in the pH range of 4–11, whereas the CCG colloid gained stability at a relatively narrower pH range of 7–10. Poor stability of the colloids was observed for both GO and CCG colloids at both extremes of the pH scale. Both of the colloids exhibited average size of ~1 micron in the low pH range, whereas for higher pH the size ranged between 300 and 500?nm. The UV-Vis spectra showed absorption peak at 230?nm for GO colloids that shifted to 260?nm for the CCG colloid. Such shift can be ascribed to restoring of electronic conjugation of the C=C bonds in CCG. 1. Introduction Graphene is a flat 2D layer of carbon atoms packed in a honeycomb lattice and is the basal building block in all graphitic materials [1]. Its different synthesis routes and the possession of unique mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties make it a material of great interest [2–7]. In spite of the viable structure-property relationship, large volume production of graphene is still a challenge. Graphene oxide syntheses via chemical methods using acids and oxidants are the most widely followed procedures, which can be further reduced to produce graphene [8–10]. Graphene oxide (GO) can be best described as a single layer planar hexagonal array of carbon atoms to which functional groups, including carboxylic acid, hydroxyl, epoxy, and carbonyl groups, are attached. According to the Lerf-Klinowski model, the carbonyl and carboxylic groups remain attached to the edges of the sheet, while the hydroxyl and epoxy groups are found on the basal plane [11]. These groups render the GO sheets hydrophilic due to the H-bonding present between the carboxylic and hydroxyl groups. This property opens up many opportunities for chemical reactions and schemes, including self-assembly and thin films processing, to exploit the beneficial properties of graphene oxide. On the contrary, graphene sheets that are devoid of any O-containing functional groups are insoluble in water, thus posing a challenge for the exploitation of graphene in aqueous processing methods. Several methods, including functionalization [12–14], in situ reduction [15, 16], or polymeric reduction [17] of GO sheets in aqueous medium, can be
References
[1]
A. K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov, “The rise of graphene,” Nature Materials, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 183–191, 2007.
[2]
K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov et al., “Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene,” Nature, vol. 438, pp. 197–200, 2005.
[3]
B. H. Hong, J. Y. Lee, T. Beetz, Y. Zhu, P. Kim, and K. S. Kim, “Quasi-continuous growth of ultralong carbon nanotube arrays,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 127, no. 44, pp. 15336–15337, 2005.
[4]
H. B. Heersche, P. Jarillo-Herrero, J. B. Oostinga, L. M. K. Vandersypen, and A. F. Morpurgo, “Electrical transport in high quality graphene pnp junctions,” Nature, vol. 5, p. 446, 2007.
[5]
Y. Kopelevich and P. Esquinazi, “Graphene physics in graphite,” Advanced Materials, vol. 19, no. 24, pp. 4559–4563, 2007.
[6]
G. M. Rutter, J. N. Crain, N. P. Guisinger, T. Li, P. N. First, and J. A. Stroscio, “Scattering and interference in epitaxial graphene,” Science, vol. 317, no. 5835, pp. 219–222, 2007.
[7]
A. A. Balandin, S. Ghosh, W. Bao et al., “Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene,” Nano Letters, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 902–907, 2008.
[8]
S. Stankovich, D. A. Dikin, G. H. B. Dommett et al., “Graphene-based composite materials,” Nature, vol. 442, no. 7100, pp. 282–286, 2006.
[9]
S. Stankovich, D. A. Dikin, R. D. Piner, et al., “Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide,” Carbon, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1558–1565, 2007.
[10]
G. Eda and M. Chhowalla, “Chemically derived graphene oxide: towards large-area thin-film electronics and optoelectronics,” Advanced Materials, vol. 22, no. 22, pp. 2392–2415, 2010.
[11]
D. R. Dreyer, S. Park, C. W. Bielawski, and R. S. Ruoff, “The chemistry of graphene oxide,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 228–240, 2010.
[12]
H. Kim, D. Lee, J. Kim, T.-I. Kim, and W. J. Kim, “Photothermally triggered cytosolic drug delivery via endosome disruption using a functionalized reduced graphene oxide,” ACS Nano, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 6735–6746, 2013.
[13]
C. Wang, Y. Chen, K. Zhuo, and J. Wang, “Simultaneous reduction and surface functionalization of graphene oxide via an ionic liquid for electrochemical sensors,” Chemical Communications, vol. 49, no. 32, pp. 3336–3338, 2013.
[14]
O. C. Compton, D. A. Dikin, K. W. Putz, L. C. Brinson, and S. T. Nguyen, “Electrically conductive “alkylated” graphene paper via chemical reduction of amine-functionalized graphene oxide paper,” Advanced Materials, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 892–896, 2010.
[15]
L. Lai, L. Chen, D. Zhan et al., “One-step synthesis of NH2-graphene from in situ graphene-oxide reduction and its improved electrochemical properties,” Carbon, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 3250–3257, 2011.
[16]
S. Liu, J. Tian, L. Wang, and X. Sun, “A method for the production of reduced graphene oxide using benzylamine as a reducing and stabilizing agent and its subsequent decoration with Ag nanoparticles for enzymeless hydrogen peroxide detection,” Carbon, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 3158–3164, 2011.
[17]
A. J. Glover, M. Cai, K. R. Overdeep, D. E. Kranbuehl, and H. C. Schniepp, “In situ reduction of graphene oxide in polymers,” Macromolecules, vol. 44, no. 24, pp. 9821–9829, 2011.
[18]
F. Li, Y. Bao, J. Chai, Q. Zhang, D. Han, and N. Li, “Synthesis and application of widely soluble graphene sheets,” Langmuir, vol. 26, no. 14, pp. 12314–12320, 2010.
[19]
S. Gurunathan, J. W. Han, A. Abdal Dayem, V. Eppakayala, and J.-H. Kim, “Oxidative stress-mediated antibacterial activity of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide in Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” International Journal of Nanomedicine, vol. 7, pp. 5901–5914, 2012.
[20]
T. Chen, B. Zeng, J. L. Liu et al., “High throughput exfoliation of graphene oxide from expanded graphite with assistance of strong oxidant in modified Hummers method,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 188, Article ID 012051, 2009.
[21]
D. R. Dreyer, S. Park, C. W. Bielawski, and R. S. Ruoff, “The chemistry of graphene oxide,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 228–240, 2010.
[22]
D. Li, M. B. Müller, S. Gilje, R. B. Kaner, and G. G. Wallace, “Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 101–105, 2008.
[23]
R. J. Hunter, “Electro kinetics and zeta potential,” in Foundations of Colloid Science, vol. 2, pp. 376–377, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
[24]
T. Kuila, P. Khanra, N. H. Kim, J. K. Lim, and J. H. Lee, “Effects of sodium hydroxide on the yield and electrochemical performance of sulfonated poly(ether-ether-ketone) functionalized graphene,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 1, no. 32, pp. 9294–9302, 2013.
[25]
Y. Zhu, S. Murali, M. D. Stoller, et al., “Carbon-based supercapacitors produced by activation of graphene,” Science, vol. 332, no. 6037, pp. 1537–1541, 2011.
[26]
D. Zhang, X. Zhang, Y. Chen, C. Wang, and Y. Ma, “An environment-friendly route to synthesize reduced graphene oxide as a supercapacitor electrode material,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 69, pp. 364–370, 2012.
[27]
X. Fan, W. Peng, Y. Li, et al., “Deoxygenation of exfoliated graphite oxide under alkaline conditions: a green route to graphene preparation,” Advanced Materials, vol. 20, no. 23, pp. 4490–4493, 2008.
[28]
F. Yang, Y. Liu, L. Gao, and J. Sun, “pH-sensitive highly dispersed reduced graphene oxide solution using lysozyme via an in situ reduction method,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 114, no. 50, pp. 22085–22091, 2010.