The Natural Environment White Paper represents the most important shift in conservation policy in the United Kingdom for over 20 years. It formalizes the ecosystem services approach within policy objectives and emphasizes the economic value of ecosystem services. The ecosystem services approach embodies different meanings to different groups, each suggesting distinct governance paradigms and management tools. While conservationists’ support for the ecosystem services approach may stem from arguments for integrated and holistic management of natural systems, valuation efforts seek to apply economic tools to complex ecosystem processes as a means of increasing the policy salience of ecosystem services for management. Does this coupling make for strange bedfellows? We apply the Advocacy Coalition Framework to examine the alignment of the values and beliefs of key United Kingdom actors. Understanding core and peripheral values may help actors anticipate where cooperation and conflict arise, and the potential longevity of policy partnerships.
References
[1]
Cardinale, B.J.; Duffy, J.E.; Gonzalez, A.; Hooper, D.U.; Perrings, C.; Venail, P.; Narwani, A.; Mace, G.M.; Tilman, D.; Wardle, D.A. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 2012, 486, 59–67, doi:10.1038/nature11148.
[2]
Rockstr？m, J.; Steffen, W.; Noone, K.; Persson, ？.; Chapin, F.S.; Lambin, E.F.; Lenton, T.M.; Scheffer, M.; Folke, C.; Schellnhuber, H.J.; et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 2009, 461, 472–475.
[3]
Rudd, M.A. Scientists’ opinions on the global status and management of biological diversity. Cons. Biol. 2011, 25, 1165–1175, doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01772.x.
[4]
Christensen, N.L.; Bartuska, A.M.; Brown, J.H.; Carpenter, S.; D’Antonio, C.; Francis, R.; Franklin, J.F.; MacMahon, J.A.; Noss, R.F.; Parsons, D.J. The report of the Ecological Society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecol. Appl. 1996, 6, 665–691, doi:10.2307/2269460.
[5]
Grumbine, R.E. What is ecosystem management? Cons. Biol. 1994, 8, 27–38.
[6]
Daily, G.C. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1997.
[7]
Hassan, R.; Scholes, R.; Ash, N.; Carpenter, S.R.; Pingali, P.L.; Bennett, E.M.; Zurek, M.B.; Chopra, K.; Leemans, R.; Kumar, P.; Simons, H. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being Volumes: Current State and Trends: Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
[8]
TEEB—The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB; Earthscan, Routledge: London, UK, 2010.
[9]
Yaffee, S.L. Three faces of ecosystem management. Cons. Biol. 1999, 13, 713–725, doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98127.x.
[10]
Noss, R.F.; Cooperrider, A. Saving Nature’s Legacy: Protecting and Restoring Biodiversity; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1994.
[11]
Gómez-Baggethun, E.; de Groot, R.; Lomas, P.L.; Montes, C. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 1209–1218, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007.
[12]
Bateman, I.; Mace, G.; Fezzi, C.; Atkinson, G.; Turner, K. Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2011, 48, 177–218, doi:10.1007/s10640-010-9418-x.
[13]
Redford, K.H.; Adams, W.M. Payment for ecosystem services and the challenge of saving nature. Cons. Biol. 2009, 23, 785–787, doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01271.x.
[14]
Spash, C.L. Ethics and environmental attitudes with implications for economic valuation. J. Environ. Manag. 1997, 50, 403–416, doi:10.1006/jema.1997.0017.
[15]
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). The Natural Choice: Securing the Value of Nature; DEFRA: London, UK, 2011.
[16]
Balvanera, P.; Pfisterer, A.B.; Buchmann, N.; He, J.-S.; Nakashizuka, T.; Raffaelli, D.; Schmid, B. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9, 1146–1156, doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00963.x.
[17]
UK National Ecosystem Assessment. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report; United Nations Environment Programme, World Conservation Monitoring Center (UNEP-WCMC): Cambridge, UK, 2011.
[18]
Environmental Value Transfers: Issues and Methods; Navrud, S., Ready, R., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007.
[19]
Mahoney, C. Networking vs. allying: the decision of interest groups to join coalitions in the US and the EU. J. Eur. Public Policy 2007, 14, 366–383, doi:10.1080/13501760701243764.
[20]
Policy Change and Learning: Advocacy Coalition Approach; Sabatier, P.A., Jenkins-Smith, H.C., Eds.; Westview Press Inc.: Boulder, CO, USA, 1993.
[21]
Weible, C.M.; Sabatier, P.A. Coalitions, science, and belief change: Comparing adversarial and collaborative policy subsystems. Policy Stud. J. 2009, 37, 195–212, doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00310.x.
[22]
Szarka, J. Bringing interests back in: Using coalition theories to explain European wind power policies. J. Eur. Public Policy 2010, 17, 836–853, doi:10.1080/13501763.2010.486988.
[23]
North, D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990.
[24]
NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software. QSR International Pty Ltd.. Version 10, 2012.
[25]
Gibbs, G.R. Qualitative Data Analysis: Explorations with NVivo; Open University Publications: Maidenhead, UK, 2002.
[26]
Manning, A.; Serpell, J. Animals and Human Society: Changing Perspectives; Routledge: London, UK, 1994.
[27]
Coates, P. Nature: Western Attitudes Since Ancient Times; University of California Press: California, CA, USA, 2004.
[28]
Malcolm, L.H., Jr; Gibbs, J.P. Fundamentals of Conservation Biology, 3rd ed. ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006.
Worster, D. The intrinsic value of nature. Env. Rev. 1980, 4, 43–49, doi:10.2307/3984108.
[34]
Meadows, D.H.; Randers, J.; Meadows, D.L.; Behrens, W.W. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind, 2nd ed. ed.; New American Library: New York, NY, USA, 1974.
[35]
Daly, H. Steady-State Economics, 2nd ed. ed.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1977.
[36]
Our Common Future: From One Earth to One World. Report of the Brundtland Commission; World Commission on Environment and Development, United Nations, Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1987.
[37]
Locke, J. Second Treatise of Government. In Two Treatises of Government [1689]; Hollis, T., Ed.; A. Millar [et al.]: London, UK, 1764; pp. 193–416.
[38]
Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice: Revised edition; Harvard University Press: Harvard, BO, USA, 1999.
[39]
Scanlon, T.M. Contractualism and Utilitarianism. In Utilitarianism and Beyond; Sen, A., Williams, B., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1982; pp. 103–129.
[40]
Pollitt, C.; Bouckaert, G. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis—New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2011.
[41]
Habermas, J. The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society; Beacon Press: Boston, MA, USA, 1985.
[42]
Dryzek, J.S. Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2010.
[43]
Sabatier, P.A. The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. J. Eur. Public Policy 1998, 5, 98–130, doi:10.1080/13501768880000051.
[44]
Randall, A. Total economic value as a basis for policy. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 1987, 325–335, doi:10.1577/1548-8659(1987)116<325:TEVAAB>2.0.CO;2.
[45]
Jay, S.; Jones, C.; Slinn, P.; Wood, C. Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect. Environ. Impact Asses. Rev. , 287–300.
[46]
Carson, R.T.; Mitchell, R.C.; Hanemann, M.; Kopp, R.J.; Presser, S.; Ruud, P.A. Contingent valuation and lost passive use: Damages from the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2003, 25, 257–286.
[47]
European Commission Managing Natura 2000 Sites. The Provisions of Article 6 of the “Habitats” Directive; European Communities: Luxembourg, 2000.
[48]
Dunbar, M.B.; Panagos, P.; Montanarella, L. European perspective of ecosystem services and related policies. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2013, 9, 231–236, doi:10.1002/ieam.1400.
[49]
Hoepner, A.G.F.; Kant, B.; Yu, P.S. Environmental and ecological economics in the 21st century: an age adjusted citation analysis of the influential articles, journals, authors and institutions. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 77, 193–206, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.002.
[50]
Guha, R.; Martinez-Allier, J. Varieties of Environmentalism: Essays North and South; Earthscan: London, UK, 1997.
[51]
Advances in Behavioral Economics; Camerer, C.F., Loewenstein, G., Rabin, M., Eds.; Russell Sage Foundation: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2004.
[52]
Taylor, E.; Pinkus, S. The effects of lead agency, non-governmental organizations, and recovery team membership on the identification of critical habitat for species at risk: Insights from the Canadian experience. Environ. Rev. 2013, 21, 93–102, doi:10.1139/er-2013-0002.
