Understanding the spatial patterns of urban land use at both the macro and the micro levels is a central issue in global change studies. Due to the nonlinear features associated with land use spatial patterns, it is currently necessary to provide some distinct analysis methods to analyze them across a range of remote sensing imagery resolutions. The objective of our study is to quantify urban land use patterns from various perspectives using multidimensional fractal methods. Three commonly used fractal dimensions, i.e., the boundary dimension, the radius dimension, and the information entropy dimension, are introduced as the typical indices to examine the complexity, centrality and balance of land use spatial patterns, respectively. Moreover, a new lacunarity dimension for describing the degree of self-organization of urban land use at the macro level is presented. A cloud-free Landsat ETM+ image acquired on 17 September 2010 was used to extract land use information in Wuhan, China. The results show that there are significant linear relationships represented by good statistical fitness related to these four indices. The results indicate that rapid urbanization has substantially affected the urban landscape pattern, and different land use types show different spatial patterns in response. This analysis reveals that multiple fractal/nonfractal indices provides a more comprehensive understanding of the spatial heterogeneity of urban land use spatial patterns than any single fractal dimension index. These findings can help us to gain deeper insight into the complex spatial patterns of urban land use.
References
[1]
Carlson, T.N.; Arthur, S.T. The impact of land use-land cover changes due to urbanization on surface microclimate and hydrology: A satellite perspective. Glob. Planet. Chang 2000, 25, 49–65.
[2]
Thapa, R.B.; Murayama, Y. Examining spatiotemporal urbanization patterns in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal: Remote sensing and spatial metrics approaches. Remote Sens 2009, 1, 534–556.
[3]
Vitousek, P.M.; Mooney, H.A.; Lubchenco, J.; Melillo, J.M. Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science 1997, 277, 494–499.
[4]
Wu, H.; Zhou, L.; Chi, X.; Li, Y.; Sun, Y. Quantifying and analyzing neighborhood configuration characteristics to cellular automata for land use simulation considering data source error. Earth Sci. Inform 2012, 5, 77–86.
[5]
Dewan, A.M.; Yamaguchi, Y. Land use and land cover change in Greater Dhaka, Bangladesh: Using remote sensing to promote sustainable urbanization. Appl. Geogr 2009, 29, 390–401.
[6]
Dewan, A.M.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Rahman, M.Z. Dynamics of land use/cover changes and the analysis of landscape fragmentation in Dhaka Metropolitan, Bangladesh. GeoJournal 2012, 77, 315–330.
[7]
Herold, M.; Goldstein, N.C.; Clarke, K.C. The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: Measurement, analysis and modeling. Remote Sens. Environ 2003, 86, 286–302.
[8]
Herold, M.; Mayaux, P.; Woodcock, C.E.; Baccini, A.; Schmullius, C. Some challenges in global land cover mapping: An assessment of agreement and accuracy in existing 1 km datasets. Remote Sens. Environ 2008, 112, 2538–2556.
[9]
Xiong, Y.Z.; Huang, S.P.; Chen, F.; Ye, H.; Wang, C.P.; Zhu, C.B. The impacts of rapid urbanization on the thermal environment: A remote sensing study of Guangzhou, South China. Remote Sens 2012, 4, 2033–2056.
[10]
Atzberger, C.; Rembold, F. Mapping the spatial distribution of winter crops at sub-pixel level using AVHRR NDVI time series and neural nets. Remote Sens 2013, 5, 1335–1354.
[11]
Fritz, S.; McCallum, I.; Schill, C.; Perger, C.; Grillmayer, R.; Achard, F.; Kraxner, F.; Obersteiner, M. Geo-Wiki.Org: The use of crowdsourcing to improve global land cover. Remote Sens 2009, 1, 345–354.
[12]
Thenkabail, P.S.; Enclona, E.A.; Ashton, M.S.; Legg, C.; de Dieu, M.J. Hyperion, IKONOS, ALI, and ETM plus sensors in the study of African rainforests. Remote Sens. Environ 2004, 90, 23–43.
[13]
Rudorff, B.F.T.; Aguiar, D.A.; Silva, W.F.; Sugawara, L.M.; Adami, M.; Moreira, M.A. Studies on the rapid expansion of sugarcane for ethanol production in Sao Paulo State (Brazil) using landsat data. Remote Sens 2010, 2, 1057–1076.
[14]
Mundia, C.N.; Aniya, M. Dynamics of land use/cover changes and degradation of Nairobi City, Kenya. Land Degrad. Dev 2006, 17, 97–108.
[15]
Jat, M.K.; Garg, P.K.; Khare, D. Monitoring and modeling of urban sprawl using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf 2008, 10, 26–43.
[16]
Dewan, A.M.; Yamaguchi, Y. Using remote sensing and GIS to detect and monitor land use and land cover change in Dhaka Metropolitan of Bangladesh during 1960–2005. Environ. Monit. Assess 2009, 150, 237–249.
[17]
Braimoh, A.K.; Onishi, T. Spatial determinants of urban land use change in Lagos, Nigeria. Land Use Policy 2007, 24, 502–515.
[18]
Foody, G.M. Mapping land cover from remotely sensed data with a softened feedforward neural network classification. J. Intell. Robot. Syst 2000, 29, 433–449.
[19]
Kalluri, S.N.V.; Jaja, J.; Bader, D.A.; Zhang, Z.; Townshend, J.R.G.; Fallah-Adl, H. High performance computing algorithms for land cover dynamics using remote sensing data. Int. J. Remote Sens 2000, 21, 1513–1536.
[20]
Tadesse, W.; Tsegaye, T.; Coleman, T. Land Use/Cover Change Detection of the City of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Using Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System Technology. Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 9–13 July 2001.
[21]
Friedl, M.A.; McIver, D.K.; Hodges, J.C.F.; Zhang, X.Y.; Muchoney, D.; Strahler, A.H.; Woodcock, C.E.; Gopal, S.; Schneider, A.; Cooper, A.; et al. Global land cover mapping from MODIS: Algorithms and early results. Remote Sens. Environ 2002, 83, 287–302.
[22]
Huete, A.R.; Miura, T.; Gao, X. Land cover conversion and degradation analyses through coupled soil-plant biophysical parameters derived from hyperspectral EO-1 Hyperion. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens 2003, 41, 1268–1276.
[23]
Gitas, I.Z.; Mitri, G.H.; Ventura, G. Object-based image classification for burned area mapping of Creus Cape, Spain, using NOAA-AVHRR imagery. Remote Sens. Environ 2004, 92, 409–413.
[24]
Thenkabail, P.S.; Schull, M.; Turral, H. Ganges and Indus river basin land use/land cover (LULC) and irrigated area mapping using continuous streams of MODIS data. Remote Sens. Environ 2005, 95, 317–341.
[25]
De Almeida, C.M.; Monteiro, A.M.V.; Soares, G.; Cerqueira, G.C.; Pennachin, C.L.; Batty, M. GIS and remote sensing as tools for the simulation of urban land-use change. Int. J. Remote Sens 2005, 26, 759–774.
[26]
Duran, Z.; Musaoglu, N.; Seker, D.Z. Evaluating urban land use change in historical peninsula, Istanbul, by using gis and remote sensing. Fresenius Environ. Bull 2006, 15, 806–810.
[27]
Chang, L.; Tang, Z.H. Using remote sensing technology to assess land-use changes after the northridge earthquake. Disaster Adv 2010, 3, 5–10.
[28]
Zurita-Milla, R.; Gomez-Chova, L.; Guanter, L.; Clevers, J.G.P.W.; Camps-Valls, G. Multitemporal unmixing of medium-spatial-resolution satellite images: A case study using meris images for land-cover mapping. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens 2011, 49, 4308–4317.
[29]
Myint, S.W.; Gober, P.; Brazel, A.; Grossman-Clarke, S.; Weng, Q. Per-pixel vs. object-based classification of urban land cover extraction using high spatial resolution imagery. Remote Sens. Environ 2011, 115, 1145–1161.
[30]
Dymond, J.R.; Shepherd, J.D.; Newsome, P.F.; Gapare, N.; Burgess, D.W.; Watt, P. Remote sensing of land-use change for Kyoto Protocol reporting: The New Zealand case. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 16, 1–8.
[31]
Lambin, E.F.; Geist, H.J.; Lepers, E. Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour 2003, 28, 205–241.
[32]
Le, Q.B.; Park, S.J.; Vlek, P.L.G.; Cremers, A.B. Land-Use Dynamic Simulator (LUDAS): A multi-agent system model for simulating spatio-temporal dynamics of coupled human-landscape system. I. Structure and theoretical specification. Ecol. Inform 2008, 3, 135–153.
[33]
Crews-Meyer, K.A. Agricultural landscape change and stability in northeast Thailand: Historical patch-level analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 2004, 101, 155–169.
Roy, P.S.; Tomar, S. Landscape cover dynamics pattern in Meghalaya. Int. J. Remote Sens 2001, 22, 3813–3825.
[36]
Kwan, M.P; Weber, J. Scale and accessibility: Implications for the analysis of land use—Travel interaction. Appl. Geogr 2008, 28, 110–123.
[37]
Schmit, C.; Rounsevell, M.D.A.; La, J.I. The limitations of spatial land use data in environmental analysis. Environ. Sci. Policy 2006, 9, 174–188.
[38]
Ling, Y.Y. The Study of Urban Land Use Structure and Its Non-Linear Transformation (In Chinese)Ms.C. Thesis, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China. 2004.
[39]
Shi, P.J. Methodology and Practice of Land Use/Cover Change Study. (In Chinese); Science Press: Beijing, China, 2000.
[40]
Weng, Q.H. Fractal analysis of satellite-detected urban heat island effect. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens 2003, 69, 555–566.
[41]
De Cola, L. Fractal analysis of a classified Landsat scene. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens 1989, 55, 601–610.
[42]
Lam, N.S.N. Description and measurement of landsat TM images using fractals. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens 1990, 56, 187–195.
[43]
Lam, N.S.N.; Quattrochi, D.A. On the issues of scale, resolution, and fractal analysis in the mapping sciences. Prof. Geogr 1992, 44, 88–98.
[44]
Myint, S.W.; Lam, N.S.N.; Tyler, J.M. Wavelets for urban spatial feature discrimination: Comparisons with fractal, spatial autocorrelation, and spatial co-occurrence approaches. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens 2004, 70, 803–812.
[45]
Emerson, C.W.; Lam, N.S.N.; Quattrochi, D.A. A comparison of local variance, fractal dimension, and Moran’s I as aids to multispectral image classification. Int. J. Remote Sens 2005, 26, 1575–1588.
[46]
Myint, S.W.; Lam, N.S.N. Examining lacunarity approaches in comparison with fractal and spatial autocorrelation techniques for urban mapping. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens 2005, 71, 927–937.
[47]
Zhou, G.Y.; Lam, N.S.N. A comparison of fractal dimension estimators based on multiple surface generation algorithms. Comput. Geosci 2005, 31, 1260–1269.
[48]
Myint, S.W.; Mesev, V.; Lam, N.S.N. Urban textural analysis from remote sensor data: Lacunarity measurements based on the differential box counting method. Geogr. Anal 2006, 38, 371–390.
[49]
Ju, W.X.; Lam, N.S.N. An improved algorithm for computing local fractal dimension using the triangular prism method. Comput. Geosci 2009, 35, 1224–1233.
[50]
Zeng, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, H. Fractal Characteristics of very High Resolution Satellite Imagery. Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Barcelona, Spain, 23–27 July 2007.
[51]
Emerson, C.W.; Lam, N.S.N.; Quattrochi, D.A. A comparison of local variance, fractal dimension, and Moran’s I as aids to multispectral image classification. Int. J. Remote Sens 2005, 26, 1575–1588.
[52]
Tang, J.; Bu, K.; Yang, J.; Zhang, S.; Chang, L. Multitemporal analysis of forest fragmentation in the upstream region of the Nenjiang River Basin, Northeast China. Ecol. Indic 2012, 23, 597–607.
[53]
Tran, T.D.B.; Puissant, A.; Badariotti, D.; Weber, C. Optimizing spatial resolution of imagery for urban form detection—The cases of France and vietnam. Remote Sens 2011, 3, 2128–2147.
[54]
Liang, B.; Weng, Q.; Tong, X. An evaluation of fractal characteristics of urban landscape in Indianapolis, USA, using multi-sensor satellite images. Int. J. Remote Sens 2013, 34, 804–823.
[55]
Sun, J.; Southworth, J. Remote sensing-based fractal analysis and scale dependence associated with forest fragmentation in an amazon tri-national frontier. Remote Sens 2013, 5, 454–472.
[56]
Sun, W.; Xu, G.; Gong, P.; Liang, S. Fractal analysis of remotely sensed images: A review of methods and applications. Int. J. Remote Sens 2006, 27, 4963–4990.
[57]
Batty, M. Fractals - geometry between dimensions. New Sci 1985, 105, 31–35.
[58]
Batty, M.; Longley, P.A. Fractal-based description of urban form. Environ. Plann. B 1987, 14, 123–134.
[59]
Frankhauser, P.; Sadler, R. Fractal Analysis of Agglomerations. In Natural Structures: Principles, Strategies, and Models in Architecture and Nature; Hilliges, M., Ed.; University of Stuttgart: Stuttgart, Germany, 1991; pp. 57–65.
[60]
White, R.; Engelen, G. Cellular automata and fractal urban form: A cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environ. Plan. A 1993, 25, 1175–1199.
[61]
Culling, W.E.H. Dimension and entropy in the soil-covered landscape. Earth Surf. Process. Landf 1988, 13, 619–648.
[62]
Martin, M.A.; Rey, J.M.; Taguas, F.J. An entropy-based heterogeneity index for mass-size distributions in Earth science. Ecol. Model 2005, 182, 221–228.
[63]
Wang, D.; Fu, B.; Zhao, W.; Hu, H.; Wang, Y. Multifractal characteristics of soil particle size distribution under different land-use types on the Loess Plateau, China. Catena 2008, 72, 29–36.
[64]
Fernández, E.; Jelinek, H.F. Use of fractal theory in neuroscience: Methods, advantages, and potential problems. Methods 2001, 24, 309–321.
[65]
Dong, P. Lacunarity for spatial heterogeneity measurement in GIS. Geogr. Inf. Sci 2000, 6, 20–26.
[66]
Mandelbrot, B.B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature; W.H. Freeman and Company: New York, NY, USA, 1982.
[67]
Mandelbrot, B.B.; Vespignani, A.; Kaufman, H. Crosscut analysis of large radial DLA: Departures from self-similarity and lacunarity effects. Europhys. Lett 1995, 32, 199–204.
[68]
Plotnick, R.E.; Gardner, R.H.; O’Neill, R.V. Lacunarity indices as measures of landscape texture. Landsc. Ecol 1993, 8, 201–211.
