New biocomposites consisting of poly (butylene succinate) (PBS) and various content (0–70?wt%) of oil palm mesocarp fiber (OPMF) or oil palm empty fruit bunch fiber (OPEFBF) were fabricated by melt blending and subsequently hotpress moulding. The tensile, flexural, and impact properties of those biocomposites were evaluated and compared. Enhancement of flexural modulus of 200 or 150% was observed with PBS biocomposite loaded with 70?wt% of OPMF or OPEFBF. PBS/OPMF biocomposites exhibited higher values of tensile, flexural and impact strengths, and tensile and flexural moduli than those of PBS/OPEFBF biocomposites. These results indicated that OPMF feature better reinforcing agent for PBS as compared to that of OPEFBF. 1. Introduction Poly (butylene succinate) (PBS) is a biodegradable polymer synthesized by the polycondensation of 1, 4-butanediol and succinic acid [1]. It has excellent mechanical properties, melt processing capability, and biodegradability [2]. It can be degraded by microorganisms in compost, soil, and seawater [1, 3]. However, relatively high production cost of PBS as compared to nonbiodegradable polymer has limited many of its applications. Therefore, blending of PBS with low cost natural fiber may produce the required materials at competitive price [3]. Utilization of natural fibers in composite preparation offer several advantages compared to those of synthetic fibers which include low density, low cost, renewability, and biodegradability [4, 5]. Natural fibers like kenaf [3, 6], jute [2, 5], coir [7], silk [8], bamboo [9], sisal [10], and oil palm empty fruit bunch [11–13] have been extensively studied for fabrication of polymer/fiber composites. Rozman et al. [11] reported that incorporation of the OPEFBF into polypropylene matrix resulted in an improved tensile modulus but reduced in tensile strength, elongation at break, and impact strength with increasing fiber content. Biomass of OPMF and OPEFBF are lignocellulosic materials produced in palm oil mill after the oil extraction process. OPEFBF is obtained from the fruit bunch after removal of oil palm fruits whereas OPMF is residue obtained from oil palm fruits after the oil extraction [14]. They are either left in the palm oil mill as wastes or used as boiler fuel to produce steam and to generate power [13, 15]. The current utilization of these fibers however has created huge environmental pollution to the environment. Due to this reason, this research was carried out to utilize them in a better way as filler for biocomposites preparation. Additionally, the utilization of these
References
[1]
H.-S. Kim, H.-J. Kim, J.-W. Lee, and I.-G. Choi, “Biodegradability of bio-flour filled biodegradable poly(butylene succinate) bio-composites in natural and compost soil,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 1117–1127, 2006.
[2]
L. Liu, J. Yu, L. Cheng, and X. Yang, “Biodegradability of poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) composite reinforced with jute fibre,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 90–94, 2009.
[3]
M. Z. A. Thirmizir, Z. A. M. Ishak, R. M. Taib, S. Rahim, and S. M. Jani, “Kenaf-bast-fiber-filled biodegradable poly(butylene succinate) composites: effects of fiber loading, fiber length, and maleated poly(butylene succinate) on the flexural and impact properties,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 122, no. 5, pp. 3055–3063, 2011.
[4]
A. Jahan, M. M. Rahman, H. Kabir et al., “Comparative study of physical and elastic properties of jute and glass fiber reinforced LDPE composites,” International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, vol. 1, pp. 68–72, 2012.
[5]
V. Tserki, P. Matzinos, and C. Panayiotou, “Novel biodegradable composites based on treated lignocellulosic waste flour as filler. Part II. Development of biodegradable composites using treated and compatibilized waste flour,” Composites A, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1231–1238, 2006.
[6]
J. M. Lee, Z. A. Mohd Ishak, R. Mat Taib, T. T. Law, and M. Z. Ahmad Thirmizir, “Mechanical, thermal and water absorption properties of kenaf-fiber-based polypropylene and poly(butylene succinate) composites,” Journal of Polymers and Environment, vol. 21, pp. 293–302, 2013.
[7]
T. H. Nam, S. Ogihara, N. H. Tung, and S. Kobayashi, “Mechanical and thermal properties of short coir fibre reinforced poly(butylene succinate) biodegradable composites,” Journal of Solid Mechanics and Materials Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 251–262, 2011.
[8]
S. M. Lee, D. Cho, W. H. Park, S. G. Lee, S. O. Han, and L. T. Drzal, “Novel silk/poly(butylene succinate) biocomposites: the effect of short fibre content on their mechanical and thermal properties,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 65, no. 3-4, pp. 647–657, 2005.
[9]
L. Bao, Y. W. Chen, W. H. Zhou, Y. Wu, and Y. L. Huang, “Bamboo fibers @ poly(ethylene glycol)-reinforced poly(butylene succinate) biocomposites,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 2456–2466, 2011.
[10]
Y. H. Feng, Y. J. Li, B. P. Xu, D. W. Zhang, J. P. Qu, and H. Z. He, “Effect of fiber morphology on rheological properties of plant fiber reinforced poly(butylene succinate) composites,” Composites B, vol. 44, pp. 193–199, 2013.
[11]
H. D. Rozman, H. Ismail, R. M. Jaffri, A. Aminullah, and Z. A. M. Ishak, “Mechanical properties of polyethylene-oil palm empty fruit bunch composites,” Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 495–507, 1998.
[12]
N. A. Ibrahim, N. Hashim, M. Z. Abdul Rahman, and W. M. Z. Wan Yunus, “Mechanical properties and morphology of oil palm empty fruit bunch-polypropylene composites: effect of adding ENGAGE 7467,” Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 713–732, 2011.
[13]
M. Z. Abdul Hamid, N. A. Ibrahim, W. Md Zin Wan Yunus, K. Zaman, and M. Dahlan, “Effect of grafting on properties of oil palm empty fruit bunch fiber reinforced polycaprolactone biocomposites,” Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, vol. 29, no. 18, pp. 2723–2731, 2010.
[14]
M. S. Sreekala, M. G. Kumaran, and S. Thomas, “Oil palm fibers: morphology, chemical composition, surface modification, and mechanical properties,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 821–835, 1997.
[15]
H. Lik Nang Lau, Y. M. Choo, A. N. Ma, and C. H. Chuah, “Selective extraction of palm carotene and vitamin E from fresh palm-pressed mesocarp fiber (Elaeis guineensis) using supercritical CO2,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 289–296, 2008.
[16]
M. W. Lee, S. O. Han, and Y. B. Seo, “Red algae fibre/poly(butylene succinate) biocomposites: the effect of fibre content on their mechanical and thermal properties,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1266–1272, 2008.
[17]
L. F. Liu, J. Y. Yu, L. D. Cheng, and W. W. Qu, “Mechanical properties of poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) biocomposites reinforced with surface modified jute fibre,” Composites A, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 669–674, 2009.
[18]
Y. Habibi, W. K. El-Zawawy, M. M. Ibrahim, and A. Dufresne, “Processing and characterization of reinforced polyethylene composites made with lignocellulosic fibers from Egyptian agro-industrial residues,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 68, no. 7-8, pp. 1877–1885, 2008.
[19]
Z. A. Mohd Ishak, B. N. Yow, B. L. Ng, H. P. S. Khalil, and H. D. Rozman, “Hygrothermal aging and tensile behavior of injection-molded rice husk-filled polypropylene composites,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 742–753, 2001.
[20]
R. Mat Taib, Effect of fiber surface treatment and water absorption on the mechanical properties of steam-exploded Acacia mangium fiber filled polypropylene composites [Ph.D. dissertation], Universiti Sains Malaysia, 2003.
[21]
H.-S. Yang, H.-J. Kim, H.-J. Park, B.-J. Lee, and T.-S. Hwang, “Water absorption behavior and mechanical properties of lignocellulosic filler-polyolefin bio-composites,” Composite Structures, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 429–437, 2006.