全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Generic Properties of Curvature Sensing through Vision and Touch

DOI: 10.1155/2013/634168

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Generic properties of curvature representations formed on the basis of vision and touch were examined as a function of mathematical properties of curved objects. Virtual representations of the curves were shown on a computer screen for visual scaling by sighted observers (experiment 1). Their physical counterparts were placed in the two hands of blindfolded and congenitally blind observers for tactile scaling. The psychophysical data show that curvature representations in congenitally blind individuals, who never had any visual experience, and in sighted observers, who rely on vision most of the time, are statistically linked to the same mathematical properties of the curves. The perceived magnitude of object curvature, sensed through either vision or touch, is related by a mathematical power law, with similar exponents for the two sensory modalities, to the aspect ratio of the curves, a scale invariant geometric property. This finding supports biologically motivated models of sensory integration suggesting a universal power law for the adaptive brain control and balance of motor responses to environmental stimuli from any sensory modality. 1. Introduction Interaction of the human body with technological devices relies on the multisensory integration of visual and tactile signals by the human brain, as in the use of global positioning systems for navigation, or the encoding of visual and tactile spatial information for laparoscopic surgery, for example. Experimental studies have shown that the manipulation of visual objects with the two hands and the visual and tactile integration of shape information play an important role in action planning as well as motor control [1, 2]. This is particularly important in spatial perception by the blind who never had visual experience (congenitally blind people) but who are nonetheless perfectly capable of understanding the physical environments which surround them and of forming exact representations of complex spatial geometry. Visual and tactile representations of space are thus likely to share common generic properties. Understanding how the blind compensate through touch for lack of visual data is relevant in rehabilitation research and for the effective design of technological aids designed to help the blind explore real-world spaces [3]. Moreover, knowing how visual and tactile sensing is interactively programmed in the human brain has implications for medical robotics and clinical neurology as, for example, the study and treatment of neurological disorders such as spatial neglect [4, 5] or tactile allodynia

References

[1]  G. di Pellegrino, E. Ladavas, and A. Farnè, “Seeing where your hands are,” Nature, vol. 388, no. 6644, p. 730, 1997.
[2]  A. Farnè and E. Làdavas, “Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use,” NeuroReport, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1645–1649, 2000.
[3]  R. Held, “Visual-haptic mapping and the origin of cross-modal identity,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 595–598, 2009.
[4]  A. Maravita, M. Husain, K. Clarke, and J. Driver, “Reaching with a tool extends visual-tactile interactions into far space: evidence from cross-modal extinction,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 580–585, 2001.
[5]  A. Maravita and A. Iriki, “Tools for the body (schema),” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 79–86, 2004.
[6]  M. Tsuda, Y. Shigemoto-Mogami, S. Koizumi et al., “P2X4 receptors induced in spinal microglia gate tactile allodynia after nerve injury,” Nature, vol. 424, no. 6950, pp. 778–783, 2003.
[7]  M. S. Graziano and C. G. Cross, “The representation of extrapersonal space: a possible role for bimodal, visual-tactile neurons,” in The Cognitive Neurosciences, M. S. Gazzaniga, Ed., pp. 1054–1057, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1995.
[8]  C. L. Colby and J.-R. Duhamel, “Spatial representations for action in parietal cortex,” Cognitive Brain Research, vol. 5, no. 1-2, pp. 105–115, 1996.
[9]  Y. Iwamura, A. Iriki, and M. Tanaka, “Bilateral hand representation in the postcentral somatosensory cortex,” Nature, vol. 369, no. 6481, pp. 554–556, 1994.
[10]  G. Rizzolatti, G. Luppino, and M. Matelli, “The organization of the cortical motor system: new concepts,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 283–296, 1998.
[11]  P. H. Thakur, P. J. Fitzgerald, and S. S. Hsiao, “Second-order receptive fields reveal multidigit interactions in area 3B of the macaque monkey,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 108, pp. 243–262, 2012.
[12]  J. J. Gibson, “Observations on active touch,” Psychological Review, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 477–491, 1962.
[13]  J. J. Gibson, The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems, Houghton-Mifflin Company, Boston, Mass, USA, 1966.
[14]  J. T. Groves, “The physical chemistry of membrane curvature,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 783–784, 2009.
[15]  N. S. Hatzakis, V. K. Bhatia, J. Larsen et al., “How curved membranes recruit amphipathic helices and protein anchoring motifs,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 835–841, 2009.
[16]  R. J. Watt and D. P. Andrews, “Contour curvature analysis: hyperacuities in the discrimination of detailed shape,” Vision Research, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 449–460, 1982.
[17]  R. J. Watt, R. M. Ward, and C. Casco, “The detection of deviation from straightness in lines,” Vision Research, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1659–1678, 1987.
[18]  D. H. Foster, D. R. Simmons, and M. J. Cook, “The cue for contour-curvature discrimination,” Vision Research, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 329–341, 1993.
[19]  D. Whitaker and P. V. McGraw, “Geometric representation of the mechanisms underlying human curvature detection,” Vision Research, vol. 38, no. 24, pp. 3843–3848, 1998.
[20]  B. Dresp, C. Silvestri, and R. Motro, “Which geometric model for the curvature of 2-D shape contours?” Spatial Vision, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 219–264, 2007.
[21]  S. S. Stevens, “The direct estimation of sensory magnitudes-loudness,” The American Journal of Psychology, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 1956.
[22]  S. S. Stevens, Psychophysics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1975.
[23]  K. A. Stevens, “The visual interpretation of surface contours,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 17, no. 1–3, pp. 47–73, 1981.
[24]  J. M. Foley, N. P. Ribeiro-Filho, and J. A. da Silva, “Visual perception of extent and the geometry of visual space,” Vision Research, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 147–156, 2004.
[25]  C. Q. Howe and D. Purves, “Natural-scene geometry predicts the perception of angles and line orientation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 1228–1233, 2005.
[26]  D. L. Young and C.-S. Poon, “Soul searching and heart throbbing for biological modeling,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1080–1081, 2001.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133