A supercell convective storm is simulated by using a cloud-resolving model. Numerical experiments have been performed in 3D by using the same domain size, with a different spatial and temporal resolution of the model. High-resolution cloud model has been shown to represent convective processing quite well. Running the model in a high-resolution mode gives a more realistic view of the life cycle of convective storm, internal structure, and storm behavior. The storm structure and evolutionary properties are evaluated by comparing the modeled radar reflectivity to the observed radar reflectivity. The comparative analysis between physical parameters shows good agreement among both model runs and compares well with observations, especially using a fine spatial resolution. The lack of measurements of these species in the convective outflow region does not allow us to evaluate the model results with observations. A three-dimensional simulation using higher grid resolution mode exhibits interesting features which include a double vortex circulation, cell splitting, and secondary cell formation. 1. Introduction Convective clouds and storms represent one of the most important and challenging problems for forecasters. The severe local storms and deep convective clouds are characterized by the enhanced transport of heat and moisture in the upper layers, very strong self-organized flow fields, very complex microphysical transformations and stratospheric penetrations, and rapid evolution and dissipation processes. The precipitation processes are activated in very limited time interval and space, and their intensities are manifested by large natural variability. Supercell storms are perhaps the most violent of all storm types and are capable of producing damaging winds, large hail, and weak-to-violent tornadoes. They are most common during the spring across the mid-latitudes when moderate-to-strong atmospheric wind fields, vertical wind shear, and instability are present. The degree and vertical distribution of moisture, instability, lift, and especially wind shear have a profound influence on convective storm type. It is generally recognized that the environmental buoyancy and vertical wind shear have important effect on the characteristics of convective storms. Much of our understanding of the sensitivity of convective storms to these environment parameters has been derived from modeling studies that tested a variety of, but often idealized, environmental conditions. Numerical cloud models have contributed substantially to our understanding of supercell storms. A
References
[1]
T. L. Clark, “Numerical simulations with a three-dimensional cloud model: lateral boundary condition experiments and multicellular severe storm simulations,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 2191–2215, 1979.
[2]
W. R. Cotton and G. J. Tripoli, “Cumulus convection in shear flow 3-D numerical experiments,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 35, pp. 1503–1521, 1979.
[3]
M. Curic, D. Janc, and V. Vuckovic, “Numerical simulation of Cb cloud vorticity,” Atmospheric Research, vol. 83, no. 2-4, pp. 427–434, 2007.
[4]
J. B. Klemp and R. B. Wilhelmson, “The simulation of three-dimensional convective storm dynamics,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 35, pp. 1070–1096, 1978.
[5]
W. C. Skamarock, J. G. Powers, M. Barth et al., “Numerical simulations of the July 10 stratospheric-tropospheric experiment: radiation, aerosols, and ozone/deep convection experiment convective system: kinematics and transport,” Journal of Geophysical Research D, vol. 105, no. 15, pp. 19973–19990, 2000.
[6]
W.-K. Tao, D. Johnson, C.-L. Shie, and J. Simpson, “The atmospheric energy budget and large-scale precipitation efficiency of convective systems during TOGA COARE, GATE, SCSMEX, and ARM: cloud-resolving model simulations,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 61, no. 20, pp. 2405–2423, 2004.
[7]
G. J. Tripoli and W. R. Cotton, “The Colorado State University three-dimensional cloud/mesoscale model - 1982. Part I: general theoretical framework and sensitivity experiments,” Journal de Recherches Atmospheriques, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 185–219, 1982.
[8]
C. Wang and J. S. Chang, “A three-dimensional numerical model of cloud dynamics, microphysics, and chemistry: 1. Concepts and formulation,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 98, no. 8, pp. 14–844, 1993.
[9]
M. Xue, K. K. Droegemeier, and V. Wong, “The advanced regional prediction system (ARPS)—a multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction model. Part I: model dynamics and verification,” Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, vol. 75, no. 3-4, pp. 161–193, 2000.
[10]
A. Khain and B. Lynn, “Simulation of a supercell storm in clean and dirty atmosphere using weather research and forecast model with spectral bin microphysics,” Journal of Geophysical Research D, vol. 114, no. 19209, 23 pages, 2009.
[11]
Y.-L. Lin, R. D. Farley, and H. D. Orville, “Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model,” Journal of Climate & Applied Meteorology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1065–1092, 1983.
[12]
H. D. Orville and F. J. Kopp, “Numerical simulation of the history of a hailstorm,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 34, pp. 1596–1618, 1977.
[13]
E.-Y. Hsie, R. D. Farley, and H. D. Orville, “Numerical simulation of ice-phase convective cloud seeding,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 950–977, 1980.
[14]
M. Curic and D. Janc, “On the sensitivity of the continuous accretion rate equation used in bulk-water parameterization schemes,” Atmospheric Research, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 313–332, 1995.
[15]
M. Curic and D. Janc, “On the sensitivity of hail accretion rates in numerical modeling,” Tellus, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 100–107, 1997.
[16]
P. L. Smith, G. G. Myers, and H. D. Orville, “Radar reflectivity calculations on numerical cloud models using bulk parameterization of precipitation,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 14, pp. 1156–1165, 1975.
[17]
R. S. Sekhon and R. C. Srivastava, “Snow size spectra and radar reflectivity,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 27, pp. 299–307, 1970.
[18]
B. Telenta and N. Aleksic, “A three-dimensional simulation of the 17 June 1978 HIPLEX case with observed ice multiplication,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Cloud Modelling Workshop, vol. WMO/TD-268, pp. 277–285, Toulouse, France, August 1988.
[19]
V. Spiridonov and M. Curic, “A three-dimensional numerical simulation of sulfate transport and redistribution,” Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 81, no. 9, pp. 1067–1094, 2003.
[20]
V. Spiridonov and M. Curic, “The relative importance of scavenging, oxidation, and ice-phase processes in the production and wet deposition of sulfate,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 62, no. 7 I, pp. 2118–2135, 2005.
[21]
J. B. Klemp and D.R. Durran, “An upper boundary condition permitting internal gravity wave radiation in numerical mesoscale models,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 11, pp. 430–444, 1983.
[22]
D. R. Durran, The effects of moisture on mountain lee waves, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, Mass, USA, 1981.
[23]
A. Seifert and M. Weisman, “A comparison of microphysical schemes for cloud-resolving NWP,” in Proceedings of the WRF/MM5 User's Workshop, Boulder, Colo, USA, 2005.