全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2014 

Contraction of Online Response to Major Events

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089052

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Quantifying regularities in behavioral dynamics is of crucial interest for understanding collective social events such as panics or political revolutions. With the widespread use of digital communication media it has become possible to study massive data streams of user-created content in which individuals express their sentiments, often towards a specific topic. Here we investigate messages from various online media created in response to major, collectively followed events such as sport tournaments, presidential elections, or a large snow storm. We relate content length and message rate, and find a systematic correlation during events which can be described by a power law relation—the higher the excitation, the shorter the messages. We show that on the one hand this effect can be observed in the behavior of most regular users, and on the other hand is accentuated by the engagement of additional user demographics who only post during phases of high collective activity. Further, we identify the distributions of content lengths as lognormals in line with statistical linguistics, and suggest a phenomenological law for the systematic dependence of the message rate to the lognormal mean parameter. Our measurements have practical implications for the design of micro-blogging and messaging services. In the case of the existing service Twitter, we show that the imposed limit of 140 characters per message currently leads to a substantial fraction of possibly dissatisfying to compose tweets that need to be truncated by their users.

References

[1]  Lazer D, Pentland A, Adamic L, Aral S, Barabási AL, et al. (2009) Computational social science. Science 323: 721. doi: 10.1126/science.1167742
[2]  Kleinberg J (2003) Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 7: 373–397. doi: 10.1145/775047.775061
[3]  Barabási AL (2005) The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics. Nature 435: 207–211. doi: 10.1038/nature03459
[4]  Klimek P, Bayer W, Thurner S (2011) The blogosphere as an excitable social medium: Richter's and Omori's law in media coverage. Physica A 390: 3870–3875. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2011.05.033
[5]  Leskovec J, Backstrom L, Kleinberg J (2009) Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, pp. 497–506.
[6]  Szell M, Thurner S (2010) Measuring social dynamics in a massive multiplayer online game. Social Networks 32: 313–329. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.06.001
[7]  Szell M, Lambiotte R, Thurner S (2010) Multirelational organization of large-scale social networks in an online world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 13636–13641. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004008107
[8]  Szell M, Thurner S (2012) Social dynamics in a large-scale online game. Advances in Complex Systems 15: 1250064. doi: 10.1142/s0219525912500646
[9]  Asur S, Huberman B, Szabo G, Wang C (2011) Trends in social media: Persistence and decay. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM'11).
[10]  Yang J, Leskovec J (2011) Patterns of temporal variation in online media. In: Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. ACM, pp. 177–186.
[11]  Lehmann J, Gon?alves B, Ramasco J, Cattuto C (2012) Dynamical classes of collective attention in twitter. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, pp. 251–260.
[12]  Bagrow J, Wang D, Barabási A (2011) Collective response of human populations to large-scale emergencies. PloS one 6: e17680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017680
[13]  Grabowicz P, Ramasco J, Moro E, Pujol J, Eguiluz V (2012) Social features of online networks: The strength of intermediary ties in online social media. PLoS ONE 7: e29358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029358
[14]  Golder SA, Macy MW (2011) Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep, and daylength across diverse cultures. Science 333: 1878–1881. doi: 10.1126/science.1202775
[15]  Thurner S, Szell M, Sinatra R (2012) Emergence of good conduct, scaling and zipf laws in human behavioral sequences in an online world. PLoS ONE 7: e29796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029796
[16]  Klimek P, Thurner S (2013) Triadic closure dynamics drives scaling laws in social multiplex networks. New Journal of Physics 15: 063008. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/15/6/063008
[17]  Crane R, Sornette D (2008) Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 15649. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803685105
[18]  Head H (1920) Aphasia and kindred disorders of speech. Brain 43: 87–165. doi: 10.1093/brain/43.2.87
[19]  Paus T (2000) Functional anatomy of arousal and attention systems in the human brain. Progress in brain research 126: 65–77. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(00)26007-x
[20]  Weber D (1846) Der Tastsinn und das Gemeingefühl. Handw?rterbuch der Physiologie III 549: 1846.
[21]  Fechner G (1860) Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig, Breitkopf & H?rtel 1.
[22]  Stevens S (1957) On the psychophysical law. Psychological review 64: 153. doi: 10.1037/h0046162
[23]  Tavares G, Faisal A (2013) Scaling-laws of human broadcast communication enable distinction between human, corporate and robot twitter users. PLOS ONE 8: e65774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065774
[24]  Shamma D, Kennedy L, Churchill E (2010) Tweetgeist: Can the twitter timeline reveal the structure of broadcast events. CSCW Horizons.
[25]  González-Bailón S, Wang N, Rivero A, Borge-Holthoefer J, Moreno Y (2012) Assessing the bias in communication networks sampled from twitter. Available at SSRN 2185134.
[26]  Boyd D, Golder S, Lotan G (2010) Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on twitter. In: System Sciences (HICSS), 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on. IEEE, pp. 1–10.
[27]  Granovetter M (1978) Threshold models of collective behavior. American journal of sociology : 1420–1443.
[28]  Williams C (1940) A note on the statistical analysis of sentence-length as a criterion of literary style. Biometrika 31: 356–361. doi: 10.1093/biomet/31.3-4.356
[29]  Wake W (1957) Sentence-length distributions of Greek authors. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) 120: 331–346.
[30]  Holmes D (1985) The analysis of literary style–a review. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) : 328–341.
[31]  Furuhashi S, Hayakawa Y (2012) Lognormality of the distribution of japanese sentence lengths. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 81: 034004. doi: 10.1143/jpsj.81.034004
[32]  Sobkowicz P, Thelwall M, Buckley K, Paltaglou AG, Sobkowicz A (2013) Lognormal distributions of user post lengths in internet discussions - a consequence of the weber-fechner law? EPJ Data Science 2.
[33]  Dickman SJ (2002) Dimensions of arousal: Wakefulness and vigor. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 44: 429–442. doi: 10.1518/0018720024497673
[34]  Sarno D (2009) Twitter creator Jack Dorsey illuminates the site's founding document. Part I. The Los Angeles Times. Available: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technolo?gy/2009/02/twitter-creator.html. Accessed 2013 Aug 15.
[35]  Milian M (2009) Why text messages are limited to 160 characters. The Los Angeles Times. Available: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technolo?gy/2009/05/invented-text-messaging.html. Accessed 2013 Aug 15.
[36]  Guo J, Liu F, Zhu Z (2007) Estimate the call duration distribution parameters in gsm system based on kl divergence method. In: Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2007. WiCom 2007. International Conference on. IEEE, pp. 2988–2991.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133