全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2014 

Challenges in Translational Research: The Views of Addiction Scientists

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093482

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Objectives To explore scientists' perspectives on the challenges and pressures of translating research findings into clinical practice and public health policy. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 20 leading scientists engaged in genetic research on addiction. We asked participants for their views on how their own research translates, how genetic research addresses addiction as a public health problem and how it may affect the public's view of addiction. Results Most scientists described a direct translational route for their research, positing that their research will have significant societal benefits, leading to advances in treatment and novel prevention strategies. However, scientists also pointed to the inherent pressures they feel to quickly translate their research findings into actual clinical or public health use. They stressed the importance of allowing the scientific process to play out, voicing ambivalence about the recent push to speed translation. Conclusions High expectations have been raised that biomedical science will lead to new prevention and treatment modalities, exerting pressure on scientists. Our data suggest that scientists feel caught in the push for immediate applications. This overemphasis on rapid translation can lead to technologies and applications being rushed into use without critical evaluation of ethical, policy, and social implications, and without balancing their value compared to public health policies and interventions currently in place.

References

[1]  Stokes DE (1997) Pasteur's Quadrant. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
[2]  National Human Genome Research Institute (2003) International Consortium Completes Human Genome Project. http://www.genome.gov/11006929 Accessed 7 Septebmer 2012.
[3]  Guttmacher AE, Collins FS (2003) Welcome to the genomic era. The New England Journal of Medicine 349: 996–998. doi: 10.1056/nejme038132
[4]  Zerhouni E (2003) Medicine. The NIH Roadmap. Science 302: 63–72. doi: 10.1126/science.1091867
[5]  Zerhouni EA (2005) Translational and clinical science—time for a new vision. The New England Journal of Medicine 353: 1621–1623. doi: 10.1056/nejmsb053723
[6]  TEDMED (2012) Francis Collins at TEDMED 2012. http://www.tedmed.com/videos-info?name=F?rancis_S._Collins_at_TEDMED_2012&q=updat?ed&year=all Accessed 7 September 2012.
[7]  Levin LA, Danesh-Meyer HV (2010) Lost in translation: bumps in the road between bench and bedside. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 303: 1533–1534. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.463
[8]  Fang FC, Casadevall A (2010) Lost in translation—basic science in the era of translational research. Infection and Immunity 78: 563–566. doi: 10.1128/iai.01318-09
[9]  Wolf S (1974) Editorial: The real gap between bench and bedside. The New England Journal of Medicine 290: 802–803. doi: 10.1056/nejm197404042901411
[10]  Sung NS, Crowley WF Jr, Genel M, Salber P, Sandy L, et al. (2003) Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association 289: 1278–1287. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.10.1278
[11]  Khoury MJ, Gwinn M, Yoon PW, Dowling N, Moore CA, et al. (2007) The continuum of translation research in genomic medicine: how can we accelerate the appropriate integration of human genome discoveries into health care and disease prevention? Genetics in Medicine:Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 9: 665–674. doi: 10.1097/gim.0b013e31815699d0
[12]  Dougherty D, Conway PH (2008) The "3T's" road map to transform US health care: the "how" of high-quality care. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 299: 2319–2321.
[13]  Burke W, Burton H, Hall AE, Karmali M, Khoury MJ, et al. (2010) Extending the reach of public health genomics: what should be the agenda for public health in an era of genome-based and "personalized" medicine? Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 12: 785–791.
[14]  Burke W, Khoury MJ, Stewart A, Zimmern RL (2006) The path from genome-based research to population health: development of an international public health genomics network. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 8: 451–458. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000228213.72256.8c
[15]  Rogowski WH, Grosse SD, Khoury MJ (2009) Challenges of translating genetic tests into clinical and public health practice. Nature Reviews Genetics 10: 489–495. doi: 10.1038/nrg2606
[16]  Merikangas KR, Risch N (2003) Genomic priorities and public health. Science 302: 599–601. doi: 10.1126/science.1091468
[17]  Holtzman NA (2006) What role for public health in genetics and vice versa? Community Genetics 9: 8–20. doi: 10.1159/000090688
[18]  National Institute on Drug Abuse (2011) Understanding Drug Abuse and Addiction.
[19]  Kushner HI (2010) Toward a cultural biology of addiction. BioSocieties 5: 8–24. doi: 10.1057/biosoc.2009.6
[20]  Gardner EL (2011) Addiction and brain reward and antireward pathways. Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine 30: 22–60. doi: 10.1159/000324065
[21]  Caron L, Karkazis K, Raffin TA, Swan G, Koenig BA (2005) Nicotine addiction through a neurogenomic prism: ethics, public health, and smoking. Nicotine & tobacco research: official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco 7: 181–197. doi: 10.1080/14622200500055251
[22]  Dingel MJ, Hicks AD, Robinson ME, Koenig BA (2012) Integrating genetic studies of nicotine addiction into public health practice: stakeholder views on challenges, barriers and opportunities. Public health genomics 15: 46–55. doi: 10.1159/000328861
[23]  Gundle KR, Dingel MJ, Koenig BA (2010) 'To prove this is the industry's best hope': big tobacco's support of research on the genetics of nicotine addiction. Addiction 105: 974–983. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02940.x
[24]  Dingel MJ, Karkazis K, Koenig BA (2011) Framing nicotine addiction as a "disease of the brain": Social and ethical consequences. Social science quarterly. 92: 1363–1388.
[25]  Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[26]  Corbin J, Strauss A (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research, 3rd Edition. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
[27]  Clarke AE (2005) Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern Turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[28]  Collins FS, Green ED, Guttmacher AE, Guyer MS (2003) A vision for the future of genomics research. Nature. 422: 835–847. doi: 10.1038/nature01626
[29]  Bize R, Burnand B, Mueller Y, Walther MR, Cornuz J. (2009). Biomedical risk assessment as an aid for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009(2), DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD14004705.pub14651853.
[30]  Marteau T, Weinman J (2006) Self-regulation and the behavioural response to DNA risk information: A theoretical analysis and framework for future research. Social Science and Medicine. 62: 1360–1368. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.005
[31]  Marteau T, Senior V, Humphries SE, Bobrow M, Cranston T, Crook MA (2004) Psychological impact of genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolemia within a previously aware population: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 128A: 285–293. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30102
[32]  Fullerton SM, Wolf WA, Brothers KB, Clayton EW, Crawford DC, et al. (2012) Return of individual research results from genome-wide association studies: experience of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network. Genetics in Medicine 14: 424–431. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.15
[33]  National Institutes of Health. (2012) RFA-HG-12-009: Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (U01). http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-f?iles/rfa-hg-12-009.html. Accessed 7 Sept 2012.
[34]  Fischer ARH, Tobi H, Ronteltap A (2011) When Natural met Social: A review of collaboration between the Natural and Social sciences. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. 36: 341–358. doi: 10.1179/030801811x13160755918688

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133