全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2013 

Modeling the Minimal Newborn's Intersubjective Mind: The Visuotopic-Somatotopic Alignment Hypothesis in the Superior Colliculus

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069474

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The question whether newborns possess inborn social skills is a long debate in developmental psychology. Fetal behavioral and anatomical observations show evidences for the control of eye movements and facial behaviors during the third trimester of pregnancy whereas specific sub-cortical areas, like the superior colliculus (SC) and the striatum appear to be functionally mature to support these behaviors. These observations suggest that the newborn is potentially mature for developing minimal social skills. In this manuscript, we propose that the mechanism of sensory alignment observed in SC is particularly important for enabling the social skills observed at birth such as facial preference and facial mimicry. In a computational simulation of the maturing superior colliculus connected to a simulated facial tissue of a fetus, we model how the incoming tactile information is used to direct visual attention toward faces. We suggest that the unisensory superficial visual layer (eye-centered) and the deep somatopic layer (face-centered) in SC are combined into an intermediate layer for visuo-tactile integration and that multimodal alignment in this third layer allows newborns to have a sensitivity to configuration of eyes and mouth. We show that the visual and tactile maps align through a Hebbian learning stage and and strengthen their synaptic links from each other into the intermediate layer. It results that the global network produces some emergent properties such as sensitivity toward the spatial configuration of face-like patterns and the detection of eyes and mouth movement.

References

[1]  Nagy E (2010) The newborn infant: A missing stage in developmental psychology. Inf Child Dev: 10.1002/icd.683.
[2]  Porges S, Furman S (2010) The early development of the autonomic nervous system provides a neural platform for social behaviour: A polyvagal perspective. Inf Child Dev: 10.1002/icd.688.
[3]  Trevarthen C (2010) What is it like to be a person who knows nothing? defining the active intersubjective mind of a newborn human being. Inf Child Dev: 10.1002/icd.689.
[4]  Rochat P (2011) The self as phenotype. Consciousness and Cognition 20: 109–119.
[5]  Reddy V (2008) How Infants Know Minds. Harvard University Press.
[6]  Johnson M, Griffn R, Csibra G, Halit H, Farroni T, et al. (2005) The emergence of the social brain network: Evidence from typical and atypical development. Development and Psychopathology 17: 599–619.
[7]  Piaget J (1954) The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.
[8]  Rigato S, Menon E, Johnson M, Faraguna D, Farroni T (2010) Direct gaze may modulate face recognition in newborns. Inf Child Dev: 10.1002/icd.684.
[9]  Kuniyoshi Y, Yorozu Y, Inaba M, Inoue H (2003) From visuo-motor self learning to early imitation - a neural architecture for humanoid learning. International conference on robotics and Automation: 3132–3139.
[10]  Kuniyoshi Y, Sangawa S (2006) A neural model for exploration and learning of embodied movement patterns. Bio Cyb 95: 589–605.
[11]  Mori H, Kuniyoshi K (2007) A cognitive developmental scenario of transitional motor primitives acquisition. In: 7th international Conference on Epigenetic Robotics. 93–100.
[12]  Kinjo K, Nabeshima C, Sangawa S, Kuniyoshi Y (2008) A neural model for exploration and learning of embodied movement patterns. J of Rob and Mecha 20: 358–366.
[13]  Mori H, Kuniyoshi Y (2010) A human fetus development simulation: Self-organization of behaviors through tactile sensation. IEEE 9th International Conference on Development and Learning: 82–97.
[14]  Yamada Y, Mori H, Kuniyoshi Y (2010) A fetus and infant developmental scenario: Selforganization of goal-directed behaviors based on sensory constraints. 10th International Conference on Epigenetic Robotics: 145–152.
[15]  Pitti A, Mori H, Yamada Y, Kuniyoshi Y (2010) A model of spatial development from parietohippocampal learning of body-place associations. 10th International Conference on Epigenetic Robotics: 89–96.
[16]  Boucenna S, Gaussier P, Andry P, Hafemeister L (2010) Imitation as a communication tool for online facial expression learning and recognition. IROS: 1–6.
[17]  Meltzoff A, Moore K (1977) Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science 198: 75–78.
[18]  Meltzoff A (2007) like me: a foundation for social cognition. Developmental Science 10: 126–134.
[19]  Meltzoff A (1997) Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model. Early Development and Parenting 6: 179–192.
[20]  Ferrari P, Paukner A, Ruggiero A, Darcey L, Unbehagen S, et al. (2009) Interindividual differences in neonatal imitation and the development of action chains in rhesus macaques. Child Development 80: 1057–1068.
[21]  Lepage J, Théoret H (2007) The mirror neurons system: grasping others' action from birth? Developmental Science 10: 513–523.
[22]  Valenza E, Simion F, Macchi Cassia V, Umilta C (1996) Face preference at birth. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22: 892–903.
[23]  Simion F, Valenza E, Umilta C, DallaBarba B (1998) Preferential orienting to faces in newborns: a temporal-nasal asymmetry. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24: 1399–1405.
[24]  de Haan M, Pascalis O, Johnson M (2002) Specialization of neural mechanisms underlying face recognition in human infants. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14: 199–209.
[25]  Johnson M (2005) Subcortical face processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6: 766–774.
[26]  Johnson M (2007) Developing a social brain. Acta Pdiatrica/Acta Pdiatrica 96: 3–5.
[27]  Senju A, Johnson M (2009) The eye contact effect: mechanisms and development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13: 127–134.
[28]  Morton J, Johnson M (1991) Conspec and conlern: a two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review 98: 164–181.
[29]  Johnson M, Dziurawiec S, Ellis H, J M (1991) Newborns preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition 40: 1–19.
[30]  de Schonen S, Mathivet E (1989) First come first served: a scenario about the development of hemispheric specialization in face processing in infancy. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology 9: 3–44.
[31]  Acerra F, Burnod Y, de Schonen S (2002) Modelling aspects of face processing in early infancy. Developmental Science 5: 98–117.
[32]  Nelson C (2001) The development and neural bases of face recognition. Infant and Child Development 10: 3–18.
[33]  Turati C (2004) Why faces are not special to newborns. Current Directions in Psychological Science 13: 5–8.
[34]  Heyes C (2003) Four routes of cognitive evolution. Psychological Reviews 110: 713–727.
[35]  Brass M, Heyes C (2005) Imitation: is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? Trends in Cognitive Sciences: 489–495.
[36]  Ray E, Heyes C (2011) Imitation in infancy: the wealth of the stimulus. Developmental Science 14: 92–105.
[37]  Kalesnykas R, Sparks D (1996) The primate superior colliculus and the control of saccadic eye movements of saccadic eye movements. Neuroscientist 2: 284–292.
[38]  Stein B, Meredith M (1993) The Merging of the Senses. A Bradford Book, cambridge, MA.
[39]  Ferrell C (1996) Orientation behavior using registered topographic maps. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior: 94–103.
[40]  Crish S, Dengler-Crish C, Comer C (2006) Population coding strategies and involvement of the superior colliculus in the tactile orienting behavior of naked mole-rats. Neuroscience 139: 1461–1466.
[41]  Joseph R (2000) Fetal brain behavior and cognitive development. Developmental Review 20: 81–98.
[42]  Stein B, Standford T, Rowland B (2009) The neural basis of multisensory integration in the midbrain: Its organization and maturation. Hearing Research 258: 4–15.
[43]  Stanojevic M, Kurjak A (2008) Continuity between fetal and neonatal neurobehavior. Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2: 64–75.
[44]  James D (2010) Fetal learning: a critical review. Infant and Child Development 19: 45–54.
[45]  Groh J, Sparks D (1996) Saccades to somatosensory targets. iii. eye-position-dependent somatosensory activity in primate superior colliculus. Journal of Neurophysiology 75: 439–453.
[46]  Moschovakis A (1996) The superior colliculus and eye movement control. Current Biology 6: 811–816.
[47]  Stein B, Magalh?es Castro B, Kruger L (1975) Superior colliculus: Visuotopic-somatotopic overlap. Science 189: 224–226.
[48]  Dr?ger U, Hubel D (1976) Topography of visual and somatosensory projections to mouse superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 39: 91–101.
[49]  King A (2004) The superior colliculus. Current Biology 14: R335–R338.
[50]  Dominey P, Arbib M (1992) A cortico-subcortical model for generation of spatially accurate sequential saccades. Cerebral Cortex 2: 153–175.
[51]  Stein B (1984) Development of the superior colliculus. Ann Rev Neurosci 7: 95–125.
[52]  Wallace M (2004) The development of multisensory processes. Cogn Process 5: 69–83.
[53]  Stein B, Perrault Jr T, Stanford T, Rowland B (2010) Postnatal experiences inuence how the brain integrates information from different senses. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 30: 4904–4913.
[54]  Wallace M, Stein B (2001) Sensory and multisensory responses in the newborn monkey superior colliculus. The Journal of Neuroscience 21: 8886–8894.
[55]  Stein B, Burr D, Constantinidis C, Laurienti P, Meredith M, et al. (2010) Semantic confusion regarding the development of multisensory integration: a practical solution. European Journal of Neuroscience 31: 1713–1720.
[56]  Bednar J, Miikulainen R (2003) Learning innate face preferences. Neural Computation 15: 1525–1557.
[57]  Balas B (2010) Using innate visual biases to guide face learning in natural scenes: a computational investigation. Developmental Science 5: 469–478.
[58]  Pascalis O, de Haan M, Nelson C (2002) Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life? Science 296: 1321–1323.
[59]  Triplett J, Phan A, Yamada J, Feldheim D (2012) Alignment of multimodal sensory input in the superior colliculus through a gradient-matching mechanism. The Journal of Neuroscience 32: 5264–5271.
[60]  Benedetti F (1995) Orienting behaviour and superior colliculus sensory representations in mice with the vibrissae bent into the contralateral hemispace. European Journal of Neuroscience 7: 1512–9.
[61]  Perrault Jr T, Vaughan J, Stein B, Wallace M (2005) Superior colliculus neurons use distinct operational modes in the integration of multisensory stimuli. J Neurophysiol 93: 2575–2586.
[62]  Benedetti F (2006) Differential formation of topographic maps in the cerebral cortex and superior colliculus of the mouse by temporally correlated tactile-tactile and tactile-visual inputs. European Journal of Neuroscience 7: 1942–1951.
[63]  Wallace M, Stein B (2000) Onset of cross-modal synthesis in the neonatal superior colliculus is gated by the development of cortical inuences. J Neurophysiol 83: 3578–3582.
[64]  Wallace M, Stein B (2007) Early experience determines how the senses will interact. J Neurophysiol 97: 921–926.
[65]  Van Rullen R, Gautrais J, Delorme A, Thorpe S (1998) Face processing using one spike per neurone. BioSystems 48: 229–239.
[66]  Thorpe S, Delorme A, Van Rullen R (2001) Spike-based strategies for rapid processing. Neural Networks 14: 715–725.
[67]  Kohonen T (1982) Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biological Cybernetics 43: 59–69.
[68]  Sirosh J, Miikulainen I (1994) Cooperative self-organization of afferetn and lateral connections in cortical maps. Biological Cybernetics 71: 65–78.
[69]  Casey M, Pavlou A (2008) A behavioral model of sensory alignment in the superficial and deep layers of the superior colliculus. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 2008, Hong Kong: IEEE.
[70]  Pavlou A, Casey M (2010) Simulating the effects of cortical feedback in the superior colliculus with topographic maps. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 2010, Barcelona: IEEE.
[71]  Glas?r C, Joublin F (2011) Firing rate homeostasis for dynamic neural field formation. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development 3: 285–299.
[72]  Boucenna S, Gaussier P, Hafemeister L, Bard K (2010) Autonomous development of social referencing skills. In: Autonomous Development Of Social Referencing Skills. p. pages.
[73]  Tsunozaki M, Bautista D (2009) Mammalian somatosensory mechanotransduction. The American Journal of Dermatopathology 19: 1–8.
[74]  Boot P, Rowden G, Walsh N (1992) The distribution of merkel cells in human fetal and adult skin. The American Journal of Dermatopathology 14: 391–396.
[75]  Feller M, Butts D, Aaron H, Rokhsar D, Shatz C (1997) Dynamic processes shape spatiotemporal properties of retinal waves. Neurons 19: 293–306.
[76]  de Vries J, Visser G, Prechtl H (1982) The emergence of fetal behavior. i. qualitative aspects. Early human development 7: 301–302.
[77]  Prechtl H (2001) Prenatal and early postnatal development of human motor behaviour. Handbook of brain and behaviour in human development Kalverboer AF, Gramsbergen A, editors Amsterdam: Kluver: 415–427.
[78]  Crish S, Comer C, Marasco P, Catania K (2003) Somatosensation in the superior colliculus of the star-nosed mole. The Journal of Comparative Neurology 464: 415–425.
[79]  Van Rullen R, Thorpe S (2002) Surfing a spike wave down the ventral stream. Vision Research 42: 2593–2615.
[80]  Pellegrini G, de Arcangelis L, Herrmann H, Perrone-Capano C (2007) Activity-dependent neural network model on scale-free networks. Physical Review E 76: 016107.
[81]  Fruchterman T, Reingold E (1991) Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and Experience 21: 1129–1164.
[82]  Sporns O (2006) Small-world connectivity, motif composition, and complexity of fractal neurona connections. BioSystems 85: 55–64.
[83]  Pitti A, Lungarella M, Kuniyoshi Y (2008) Metastability and functional integration in anisotropically coupled map lattices. Eur Phys J B 63: 239–243.
[84]  Farroni T, Johnson M, Menon E, Zulian L, Faraguna D, et al. (2005) Newborns preference for face-relevant stimuli: Effects of contrast polarity. Proceeding of The National Academy of Sciences of the USA 02: 17245–17250.
[85]  Sprague J, Meikle T (1965) The role of the superior colliculus in visually guided behavior. Science 11: 115–146.
[86]  Lungarella M, Sporns O (2005) Information self-structuring: Key principle for learning and development. Proc of the 4th Int Conf on Development and Learning: 25–30.
[87]  Lungarella M, Sporns O (2006) Mapping information flow in sensorimotor networks. Plos Computational Biology 2: 1301–1312.
[88]  Kurjak A, Azumendi G, Vecek N, Kupeic S, Solak M, et al. (2005) Fetal hand and facial expression in normal pregnancy studied by four-dimensional sonography. J Perinat Med 31: 496–508.
[89]  Simion F, Regolin L, Bulf H (2008) A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proceeding of The National Academy of Sciences of the USA 105: 809–813.
[90]  Farroni T, Csibra G, Simion F, Johnson M (2002) Eye contact detection in humans from birth. Proceeding of The National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99: 9602–9605.
[91]  Streri A, Lhote M, Dutilleul S (2000) Haptic perception in newborns. Developmental Science 3: 319–327.
[92]  Takeshita H, Myowa-Yamakoshi M, Hirata S (2006) A new comparative perspective on prenatal motor behaviors: Preliminary research with four-dimensional (4d) ultrasonography. In: T Matsuzawa, M Toimonaga, M Tanaka (eds), Cognitive development in chimpanzees Tokyo: Springer-Verlag: 37–47.
[93]  Shibata M, Fuchino Y, Naoi N, Kohno S, Kawai M, et al. (2012) Broad cortical activation in response to tactile stimulation in newborns. Neuro Report 23: 373–377.
[94]  Myowa-Yamakoshi M, Takeshita H (2006) Do human fetuses anticipate self-directed actions? a study by four-dimensional (4d) ultrasonography. Infancy 10: 289–301.
[95]  Nagy E, Molnar P (2004) Homo imitans or homo provocans? human imprinting model of neonatal imitation. Infant Behavior and Development 27: 54–63.
[96]  Neil PA, Chee-Ruiter C, Scheier C, Lewkowicz DJ, Shimojo S (2006) Development of multisensory spatial integration and perception in humans. Developmental Science 9: 454–464.
[97]  Salihagic Kadic A, Predojevic M, Kurjak A (2008) Advances in fetal neurophysiology. Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2: 19–34.
[98]  Bremner A, Holmes N, Spence C (2008) Infants lost in (peripersonal) space? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12: 298–305.
[99]  Pitti A, Kuniyoshi Y (2012) Neural models for social development in shared parieto-motor circuits. Book Chapter 11 in Horizons in Neuroscience Research Volume 6, Nova Science Publishers: 247–282.
[100]  Andersen R, Snyder L, Li CS, Stricanne B (1993) Coordinate transformations in the representation information. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 3: 171–176.
[101]  Pouget A, Snyder L (1997) Spatial transformations in the parietal cortex using basis functions. J of Cog Neuro 3: 1192–1198.
[102]  Salinas E, Thier P (2000) Gain modulation: A major computational principle of the central nervous system. Neuron 27: 15–21.
[103]  Pitti A, Blanchard A, Cardinaux M, Gaussier P (2012) Gain-field modulation mechanism in multimodal networks for spatial perception. IEEE-RAS Int Conf on Humanoids Robots: 297–307.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133