全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
Sensors  2011 

A Biosensor for Urea from Succinimide-Modified Acrylic Microspheres Based on Reflectance Transduction

DOI: 10.3390/s110908323

Keywords: urea, reflectance, optical biosensor, succinimide, acrylic microspheres, photopolymerisation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

New acrylic microspheres were synthesised by photopolymerisation where the succinimide functional group was incorporated during the microsphere preparation. An optical biosensor for urea based on reflectance transduction with a large linear response range to urea was successfully developed using this material. The biosensor utilized succinimide-modified acrylic microspheres immobilized with a Nile blue chromoionophore (ETH 5294) for optical detection and urease enzyme was immobilized on the surface of the microspheres via the succinimide groups. No leaching of the enzyme or chromoionophore was observed. Hydrolysis of the urea by urease changes the pH and leads to a color change of the immobilized chromoionophore. When the color change was monitored by reflectance spectrophotometry, the linear response range of the biosensor to urea was from 0.01 to 1,000 mM (R2 = 0.97) with a limit of detection of 9.97 mM. The biosensor response showed good reproducibility (relative standard deviation = 1.43%, n = 5) with no interference by major cations such as Na+, K+, NH4+ and Mg2+. The use of reflectance as a transduction method led to a large linear response range that is better than that of many urea biosensors based on other optical transduction methods.

References

[1]  Liu, B; Hu, R; Deng, J. Studies on a potentiometric urea biosensor based on an ammonia electrode and urease, immobilized on a γ-aluminium oxide matrix. Anal. Chim. Acta 1997, 341, 161–169.
[2]  Trivedi, UB; Lakshminarayana, D; Kothari, IL; Patel, NG; Kapsed, HN; Makhija, KK; Patel, PB; Panchale, CJ. Potentiometric biosensor for urea determination in milk. Sens. Actuat. B 2009, 140, 260–266.
[3]  Lee, WY; Kim, SR; Kim, TH; Lee, KS; Shin, MC; Park, JK. Sol-gel-derived thick-film conductometric biosensor for urea determination in serum. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 404, 195–203.
[4]  Luo, YC; Do, JS. Urea biosensor based on PANi (urease)?/Au composite electrode. Biosens. Bioelectron 2004, 20, 15–23.
[5]  Singhal, R; Gambhir, A; Pandey, MK; Annapoorni, S; Malhotra, BD. Immobilization of urease on poly(N-vinyl carbazole)/stearic acid Langmuir-Blodgett films for application to urea biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron 2002, 17, 697–703.
[6]  Muawia, SA; Lee, YH; Musa, A. A urea biosensor from stacked sol-gel films with immobilized Nile blue chromoionophore and urease enzyme. Sensor 2007, 7, 2251–2262.
[7]  Senillou, A; Renault, NJ; Martelet, C; Consnier, S. A miniaturized urea sensor based on the integration of both ammonium based urease enzyme field effect transistor and a reference field effect transistor for in a single chip. Talanta 1999, 50, 219–226.
[8]  Yashuda, K; Miyagi, H; Hamada, Y; Takata, Y. Determination of urea in whole blood using a urea electrode with immobilized urease membrane. Analyst 1984, 109, 61–64.
[9]  Guilbault, GG; Shu, FR. Enzyme electrode based on the use of carbon dioxide sensor. Anal. Chem 1972, 44, 2161–2165.
[10]  Ruzicka, J; Hansen, EH; Ghose, K. Enzymatic determination of urea in serum based on pH measurement with flow injection method. Anal. Chem 1979, 51, 199–206.
[11]  Guilbault, GG; Trap, MA. Specific enzyme electrode for urea. Anal. Chim. Acta 1974, 73, 355–365.
[12]  Magalh?es, JM; Machado, AA. Urea potentiometric biosensor based on urease immobilized on chitosan membranes. Talanta 1998, 47, 183–191.
[13]  Gouda, MD; Kumar, MA; Thakur, MS; Karanth, NG. Enhancement of operational stability of an enzyme biosensor for glucose and sucrose using protein based stabilizing agents. Biosens. Bioelectron 2002, 17, 503–507.
[14]  Lakard, B; Herlem, G; Lakard, S; Antoniou, A; Fahys, B. Urea potentiometric biosensor based on modified electrodes with urease immobilized on polyethylenimine films. Biosens. Bioelectron 2004, 19, 1641–1647.
[15]  Singh, M; Verma, N; Kumar Garg, A; Redhu, N. Urea biosensors. Sens. Actuat. B 2008, 134, 345–351.
[16]  Xu, S; Han, X. A novel method to construct a third-generation biosensor: Self-assembling gold nanoparticles on thiol-functionlized poly(styrene-co-acrylic acid) nanospheres. Biosens. Bioelectron 2004, 19, 1117–1120.
[17]  Xu, S; Tu, G; Peng, B; Han, X. Self-assembling gold nanoparticles on thiol-functionalized poly(styrene-co-acrylic acid) nanospheres for fabrication of a mediatorless biosensor. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 570, 151–157.
[18]  Xu, S; Peng, B; Han, X. A third-generation H2O2 biosensor based on horseradish peroxidase-labeled Au nanoparticles self-assembled to hollow porous polymeric nanopheres. Biosens. Bioelectron 2007, 22, 1807–1810.
[19]  Wong, FCM; Ahmad, M; Heng, LY; Peng, LB. An optical biosensor for dichlovos using stacked sol-gel containing acetylcholinesterase and a lipophilic chromoionophore. Talanta 2006, 69, 888–893.
[20]  Kovács, B; Nagy, GR; Dombi, R; Tóth, K. Optical biosensor for urea with improve response time. Biosens. Bioelectron 2003, 18, 111–118.
[21]  Wofbies, OS; Li, H. Fluorescence optical urea biosensor with an ammonium optrode as transducer. Biosens. Bioelectron 1993, 8, 161–166.
[22]  Chen, JP; Chiu, SH. A poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-N-acryloxysuccinimede-co-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) composite hydrogel membrane for urease immobilization to enhance urea hydrolysis rate by temperature swing. Enzym. Micro. Technol 2000, 26, 359–367.
[23]  Chaix, C; Pacard, E; Elaissari, A; Hilaire, JF; Picot, C. Surface functionalization of oil-in-water nanoemulsion with a reactive copolymer: Colloidal characterization and peptide immobilization. Colloids Surf. B 2002, 29, 39–52.
[24]  Zor, T; Selinger, Z. Linearization of the bradford protein assay increases its sensitivity: Theoretical and experimental studies. Anal. Biochem 1996, 36, 302–308.
[25]  Williams, S. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Colombia, MD, USA, 1984.
[26]  Lee, YH; Hall, EAH. Methacrylic-acrylic polymers in ion-selective membranes: Achieving theright polymer recipe. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 403, 77–89.
[27]  Landfester, K; Schork, FJ; Kusuma, VA. Particle size distribution in mini-emulsion polymerization. Compt. Rendus Chim 2003, 6, 1337–1342.
[28]  Liu, XQ; Guan, YP; Liu, HZ; Ma, ZY; Yang, Y; Wu, XB. Preparation and characterization of magnetic polymer nanospheres with high protein binding capacity. J. Magn. Magn. Mater 2005, 293, 111–118.
[29]  Usmani, A; Akmal, N. Diagnostic Biosensor Polymer. ACS Symposium Series 556;; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1994.
[30]  Krajewska, B; Zaborska, W. The effect of phosphate buffer in the range of pH 5.80–8.07 on jack bean urease activity. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym 1999, 6, 75–81.
[31]  Francis, CMW; Musa, A; Lee, YH; Lim, BP. An optical biosensor for dichlovos using stacked sol-gel films containing acetylcholinesterase and a lipophilic chromoionophore. Talanta 2006, 69, 888–893.
[32]  Tsai, HC; Dong, R. Simultaneous determination of pH, urea, acethylcholine and heavy metals using array-based enzymatic optical biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron 2005, 20, 1796–1804.
[33]  Swati, M; Hase, NK; Srivastava, R. Nanoengineered optical urea biosensor for estimating hemodialysis parameters in spent dialysate. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 676, 68–74.
[34]  Koncki, R; Mohr, GJ; Wolfe’s, OS. Enzyme biosensor for urea based on a novel pH bulk optode membrane. Biosens. Bioelectron 1995, 10, 653–659.
[35]  Kharat, HJ; Datta, K; Ghosh, P; Shirsat, MS. Development of an optical urea biosensor using polypyrrole-polyvinyl sulphonate film. Sens. Trans. J 2009, 101, 112–122.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133