The use of electronic devices for canopy characterization has recently been widely discussed. Among such devices, LiDAR sensors appear to be the most accurate and precise. Information obtained with LiDAR sensors during reading while driving a tractor along a crop row can be managed and transformed into canopy density maps by evaluating the frequency of LiDAR returns. This paper describes a proposed methodology to obtain a georeferenced canopy map by combining the information obtained with LiDAR with that generated using a GPS receiver installed on top of a tractor. Data regarding the velocity of LiDAR measurements and UTM coordinates of each measured point on the canopy were obtained by applying the proposed transformation process. The process allows overlap of the canopy density map generated with the image of the intended measured area using Google Earth?, providing accurate information about the canopy distribution and/or location of damage along the rows. This methodology was applied and tested on different vine varieties and crop stages in two important vine production areas in Spain. The results indicate that the georeferenced information obtained with LiDAR sensors appears to be an interesting tool with the potential to improve crop management processes.
References
[1]
Llorens, J; Gil, E; Llop, J; Escolà, A. Variable Rate Dosing in Precision Viticulture: Use of Electronic Devices to Improve Application Efficiency. Crop Prot 2010, 29, 239–248.
[2]
Balsari, P; Doruchowski, G; Marucco, P; Tamagnone, M; van de Zande, JC; Wenneker, M. A System for Adjusting the Spray Application to the Target Characteristics. Agr Eng Int CIGR Ejournal 2008, X, 1–11.
[3]
Balsari, P; Marucco, P; Tamagnone, M. Variable Spray Application Rate in Orchards According to Vegetation Characteristics. Proceedings of International Conference on Agricultural Engineering (AgEng2008) “Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering for a Sustainable World”, Crete, Greece, 23–25 June 2008.
[4]
Gil, E; Escolà, A; Rosell, JR; Planas, S; Val, L. Variable Rate Application of Plant Protection Products in Vineyard Using Ultrasonic Sensors. Crop Prot 2007, 26, 1287–1297.
[5]
Escolà, A. Method for Real-Time Variable Rate Application of Plant Protection Products in Precision Horticulture/FructiculturePh.D. Thesis. Department of Agro forestry Engineering, Universitat de Lleida: Lleida, Spain, 2010. Available online: http://www.tesisenxarxa.net/TDX-1202110-164121/index_cs.html#documents2010 (accessed on 10 February 2011).
[6]
Shimborsky, E. Digital Tree Mapping and Its Applications. Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Precision Agriculture, Berlin, Germany, 15–19 June 2003; pp. 645–650.
[7]
uz-Zaman, Q; Schumann, AW. Nutrient Management Zones for Citrus Based on Variation in Soil Properties and Tree Performance. Precis. Agric 2006, 7, 45–63.
[8]
Cross, JV; Walklate, PJ. The UK PACE Scheme for Adjusting the Dose to Suit Apple Crops. Agr Eng Int CIGR Ejournal 2008, X, 1–10.
[9]
Arnó, J; Vallès, JM; Llorens, J; Blanco, R; Palacín, J; Sanz, R; Masip, J; Ribes-Dasi, M; Rosell, JR. Ground Laser Scanner Data Analysis for LAI Prediction in Orchards and Vineyards. Proceedings of International Conference on Agricultural Engineering (AgEng2006), Bonn, Germany, 3–6 September 2006.
[10]
Tumbo, SD; Salyani, M; Whitney, JD; Wheaton, TA; Miller, WM. Laser, Ultrasonic and Manual Measurements of Citrus Tree Canopy Volume. Proceedings of 2001 ASAE Annual International Meeting, Sacramento, CA, USA, 29 July–1 August 2001.
[11]
Tumbo, SD; Salyani, M; Whitney, JD; Wheaton, TA; Miller, WM. Investigation of Laser and Ultrasonic Ranging Sensors for Measurements of Citrus Canopy Volume. Appl. Eng. Agric 2002, 18, 367–372.
[12]
Whitney, JD; Tumbo, SD; Miller, WM; Wheaton, TA. Comparison between Ultrasonic and Manual Measurements of Citrus Tree Canopies. ASAE 2002. Paper No. 0210512.
[13]
Llorens, J; Gil, E; Llop, J; Escolà, A. Ultrasonic and LIDAR Sensors for Electronic Canopy Characterization in Vineyards: Advances to Improve Pesticide Application Methods. Sensors 2011, 11, 2177–2194.
[14]
Zaman, QU; Salyani, M. Effects of Foliage Density and Ground Speed on Ultrasonic Measurement of Citrus Tree Volume. Appl. Eng. Agric 2004, 20, 173–178.
[15]
Zaman, QU; Schumann, AW; Hostler, HK. Quantifying Sources of Error in Ultrasonic Measurements of Citrus Orchards. Appl. Eng. Agric 2007, 23, 449–453.
[16]
Jeon, HY; Zhu, H; Derksen, R; Ozkan, E; Krause, C. Evaluation of Ultrasonic Sensor for Variable-Rate Spray Applications. Comput. Electron. Agric 2011, 75, 213–221.
[17]
Lee, AC; Lucas, RM. A LiDAR-Derived Canopy Density Model for Tree Stem and Crown Mapping in Australian Forests. Remot. Sens. Environ 2007, 111, 493–518.
[18]
Goodwin, NR; Coops, NC; Culvenor, DS. Assessment of Forest Structure with Airborne LiDAR and the Effects of Platform Altitude. Remot. Sens. Environ 2006, 103, 140–152.
[19]
van der Zande, D; Hoet, W; Jonckheere, I; van Aardt, J; Coppin, P. Influence of Measurement Set-Up of Ground-Based LiDAR for Derivation of Tree Structure. Agr. Forest Meteorol 2006, 141, 147–160.
[20]
Moorthy, I; Miller, JR; Berni, JAJ; Zarco-Tejada, P; Hu, B; Chen, J. Field Characterization of Olive (Olea Europaea L.) Tree Crown Architecture Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data. Agric. Forest Meteorol 2011, 151, 204–214.
[21]
Palacín, J; Pallejà, T; Tresanchez, M; Sanz, R; Llorens, J; Ribes-Dasi, M; Masip, J; Arnó, J; Escolà, A; Rosell, JR. Real-Time Tree-Foliage Surface Estimation Using a Ground Laser Scanner. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas 2007, 56, 1377–1383.
[22]
Rosell Polo, JR; Sanz, R; Llorens, J; Arnó, J; Escolà, A; Ribes-Dasi, M; Masip, J; Camp, F; Gràcia, F; Solanelles, F; et al. A Tractor-Mounted Scanning LIDAR for the Non-Destructive Measurement of Vegetative Volume and Surface Area of Tree-Row Plantations: A Comparison with Conventional Destructive Measurements. Biosyst. Eng 2009, 102, 128–134.
[23]
Sanz, R; Ribes-Dasi, M; Masip, J; Arnó, J; Llorens, J; Vallès, JM; Rosell, JR; Palacín, J; Sisó, JM. Advances in the Measurement of Structural Characteristics of Plants with a LIDAR Scanner. Proceedings of International Conference on Agricultural Engineering (AgEng2004), Leuven, Belgium, 12–16 September 2004.
[24]
Rosell, JR; Llorens, J; Sanz, R; Arnó, J; Ribes-Dasi, M; Masip, J; Escolà, A; Camp, F; Solanelles, F; Gràcia, F; et al. Obtaining the Three-Dimensional Structure of Tree Orchards from Remote 2D Terrestrial LIDAR Scanning. Agric. Forest Meteorol 2009, 149, 1505–1515.
[25]
Schumann, AW; Zaman, QU. Software Development for Real-Time Ultrasonic Mapping of Tree Canopy Size. Comput. Electron. Agr 2005, 47, 25–40.
Blenkinsopp, CE; Mole, MA; Turner, IL; Peirson, WL. Measurements of the Time-Varying Free-Surface Profile across the Swash Zone obtained Using an Industrial LIDAR. Coast. Eng 2010, 57, 1059–1065.
[28]
Walklate, PJ; Cross, JV; Richardson, GM; Murray, RA; Baker, DE. Comparison of Different Spray Volume Deposition Models Using LIDAR Measurements of Apple Orchards. Biosyst. Eng 2002, 82, 253–267.
[29]
Palleja, T; Tresanchez, M; Teixido, M; Sanz, R; Rosell, JR; Palacín, J. Sensitivity of Tree Volume Measurement to Trajectory Errors from a Terrestrial LIDAR Scanner. Agric. Forest Meteorol 2010, 150, 1420–1427.
[30]
Witte, TH; Wilson, AM. Accuracy of WAAS-Enabled GPS for the Determination of Position and Speed Over Ground. J. Biomech 2005, 38, 1717–1722.
[31]
Meier, U. Estadios De Las Plantas Mono-y Dicotyledóneas. In BBCH Monograph, 2nd ed ed.; Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry: Braunschweig, Germany, 2001.
Ballagh, LM; Raup, BH; Duerr, RE; Khalsa, SJS; Helm, C; Fowler, D; Gupte, A. Representing Scientific Data Sets in KML: Methods and Challenges. Comput. Geosci 2011, 37, 57–64.
[34]
Lee, KH; Ehsani, R. A Laser Scanner Based Measurement System for Quantification of Citrus Tree Geometric Characteristics. Appl. Eng. Agric 2009, 25, 777–788.
[35]
Walklate, PJ; Richardson, GM; Cross, JV; Murray, RA. Relationship between Orchard Tree Crop Structure and Performance Characteristics of an Axial Fan Sprayer. AAB 2000, 57, 285–292.
[36]
Wohlhauser, R. Dose Rate Expression in Tree Fruits—the Need for Harmonization Approach from a Chemical Producer Industry Perspective. Proceedings of the Tree Fruit Dose Adjustment Discussion Group Meeting, Wageningen, The Netherlands, September 2009.
[37]
Gil, E; Llorens, J; Landers, A; Llop, J; Giralt, L. Field Validation of Dosavina, a Decision Support System to Determine the Optimal Volume Rate for Pesticide Application in Vineyards. Eur J Agron 2011. in press.