One of the fundamental requirements for an artificial hand to successfully grasp and manipulate an object is to be able to distinguish different objects’ shapes and, more specifically, the objects’ surface curvatures. In this study, we investigate the possibility of enhancing the curvature detection of embedded tactile sensors by proposing a ridged fingertip structure, simulating human fingerprints. In addition, a curvature detection approach based on machine learning methods is proposed to provide the embedded sensors with the ability to discriminate the surface curvature of different objects. For this purpose, a set of experiments were carried out to collect tactile signals from a 2 × 2 tactile sensor array, then the signals were processed and used for learning algorithms. To achieve the best possible performance for our machine learning approach, three different learning algorithms of Na？ve Bayes (NB), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and Support Vector Machines (SVM) were implemented and compared for various parameters. Finally, the most accurate method was selected to evaluate the proposed skin structure in recognition of three different curvatures. The results showed an accuracy rate of 97.5% in surface curvature discrimination.
References
[1]
Cutkosky, M; Howe, R; Provancher, W. Force and tactile sensors. In Handbook of Robotics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 455–476.
[2]
Okamura, AM; Cutkosky, MR. Feature detection for haptic exploration with robotic fingers. Int. J. Robot. Res 2001, 20, 925–938.
[3]
Cheng, M-Y; Lin, C-L; Lai, Y-T; Yang, Y-J. A polymer-based capacitive sensing array for normal and shear force measurement. Sensors 2010, 10, 10211–10225.
[4]
Tegin, J; Wikander, J. Tactile sensing in intelligent robotic manipulation—A review. Indust. Robot Int. J 2005, 32, 64–70.
[5]
Jenmalm, P; Dahlstedt, S; Johansson, RS. Visual and tactile information about object-curvature control fingertip forces and grasp kinematics in human dexterous manipulation. J. Neurophys 2000, 84, 2984–2997.
[6]
Fearing, R. Simplified grasping and manipulation with dextrous robot hands. IEEE J. Robot. Autom 1986, 2, 188–195.
[7]
Carrozza, M; Cappiello, G; Micera, S; Edin, B; Beccai, L; Cipriani, C. Design of a cybernetic hand for perception and action. Biol. Cybern 2006, 95, 629–644.
[8]
Dahiya, RS; Metta, G; Valle, M; Sandini, G. Tactile sensing—From humans to humanoids. IEEE Trans. Robot 2010, 26, 1–20.
[9]
Hatwell, Y; Streri, A; Gentaz, E. Touching for Knowing: Cognitive Psychology of Haptic Manual Perception; John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003.
[10]
Klatzky, R; Lederman, S. The haptic identification of everyday life objects. In Touching for Knowing: Cognitive Psychology of Haptic Manual Perception; Hatwell, Y, Streri, A, Gentaz, E, Eds.; John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 105–122.
[11]
James, TW; Kim, S; Fisher, JS. The neural basis of haptic object processing. Can. J. Exper. Psychol 2007, 61, 219–229.
Zhang, M; Weisser, VD; Stilla, R; Prather, S; Sathian, K. Multisensory cortical processing of object shape and its relation to mental imagery. Cognit. Affect. Behav. Neurosci 2004, 4, 251–259.
[14]
Gentaz, E; Hatwell, Y. Haptic processing of spatial and material object properties. In Touching for Knowing: Cognitive Psychology of Haptic Manual Perception; Hatwell, Y, Streri, A, Gentaz, E, Eds.; John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 123–159.
[15]
Kappers, A; Koenderink, JJ; Lichtenegger, I. Haptic identification of curved surfaces. Percep. Psychophys 1994, 56, 53.
[16]
Allen, P; Michelman, P. Acquisition and interpretation of 3-D sensor data from touch. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom 2002, 6, 397–404.
[17]
Allen, PK; Roberts, KS. Haptic Object Recognition Using a Multi-Fingered Dextrous Hand. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Washington, DC, USA, 11–15 May 2002; pp. 342–347.
[18]
Gaston, PC; Lozano-Perez, T. Tactile recognition and localization using object models: The case of polyhedra on a plane. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell 2009, PAMI-6, 257–266.
[19]
Gorges, N; Navarro, SE; Goger, D; Worn, H. Haptic Object Recognition Using Passive Joints and Haptic Key Features. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Anchorage, AK, USA, 3–8 May 2010; pp. 2349–2355.
[20]
Vásárhelyi, G; ádám, M; Vázsonyi, é; Bársony, I; Dücso, C. Effects of the elastic cover on tactile sensor arrays. Sens. Actuat. A Phys 2006, 132, 245–251.
[21]
Cutkosky, M; Jourdain, J; Wright, P. Skin Materials for Robotic Fingers. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Raleigh, NC, USA, 31 March–3 April 1987; pp. 1649–1654.
[22]
Scheibert, J; Leurent, S; Prevost, A; Debregeas, G. The role of fingerprints in the coding of tactile information probed with a biomimetic sensor. Science 2009, 323, 1503–1506.
[23]
Prevost, A; Scheibert, J; Debrégeas, G. Effect of fingerprints orientation on skin vibrations during tactile exploration of textured surfaces. Commun. Integr. Biol 2009, 2, 422.
[24]
Zhang, Y. Sensitivity enhancement of a micro-scale biomimetic tactile sensor with epidermal ridges. J. Micromech. Microeng 2010, 20, 085012.
[25]
Gerling, GJ. SA-I mechanoreceptor position in fingertip skin may impact sensitivity to edge stimuli. Appl. Bion. Biomech 2010, 7, 19–29.
[26]
Damian, DD; Martinez, H; Dermitzakis, K; Hernandez-Arieta, A; Pfeifer, R. Artificial Ridged Skin for Slippage Speed Detection in Prosthetic Hand Applications. Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Taipei, Taiwan, 18–22 October 2010; pp. 904–909.
[27]
Kline, M. Calculus: An Intuitive and Physical Approach; Dover Publications: New York, NY, USA, 1998.
[28]
Farin, G; Sapidis, N. Curvature and the fairness of curves and surfaces. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl 1989, 9, 52–57.
[29]
Cabibihan, J-J; Ge, SS; Salehi, S. Apparatus, System, and Method for Tactile Sense Duplication For Prosthetic/Robotic Limbs with Ridged Skin CoverUS Provisional Patent 61/370,640. 4, August, 2010.
[30]
Cabibihan, J-J; Ge, SS; Salehi, S; Jegadeesan, R; Hakkim, HA. Apparatuses, Systems and Methods for Prosthetic Replacement Manufacturing, Temperature Regulation and Tactile Sense DuplicationPCT Application Number PCT/SG2011/000255. 15, July, 2011.
[31]
Cabibihan, JJ; Pattofatto, S; Jomaa, M; Benallal, A; Carrozza, MC. Towards humanlike social touch for sociable robotics and prosthetics: Comparisons on the compliance, conformance and hysteresis of synthetic and human fingertip skins. Int. J. Soc. Robot 2009, 1, 29–40.
[32]
Edin, B; Ascari, L; Beccai, L; Roccella, S; Cabibihan, JJ; Carrozza, M. Bio-inspired sensorization of a biomechatronic robot hand for the grasp-and-lift task. Brain Res. Bull 2008, 75, 785–795.
[33]
Cabibihan, J-J. Patient-specific prosthetic fingers by remote collaboration–A case study. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19508.
[34]
Cabibihan, JJ; Pradipta, R; Ge, SS. Prosthetic finger phalanges with lifelike skin compliance for low-force social touching interactions. J NeuroEng Rehab 2011, 8, doi:10.1186/1743-0003-8-16.
[35]
Oddo, CM; Beccai, L; Felder, M; Giovacchini, F; Carrozza, MC. Artificial roughness encoding with a bio-inspired MEMS-based tactile sensor array. Sensors 2009, 9, 3161–3183.
[36]
Jain, A; Nandakumar, K; Ross, A. Score normalization in multimodal biometric systems. Patt. Recog 2005, 38, 2270–2285.
[37]
Haykin, S. Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation; Prentice Hall PTR: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1994.
