全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
Sensors  2011 

Enviro-Net: From Networks of Ground-Based Sensor Systems to a Web Platform for Sensor Data Management

DOI: 10.3390/s110606454

Keywords: micro-climate monitoring, phenology monitoring, sensor networks, Web-based sensor data management

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Ecosystems monitoring is essential to properly understand their development and the effects of events, both climatological and anthropological in nature. The amount of data used in these assessments is increasing at very high rates. This is due to increasing availability of sensing systems and the development of new techniques to analyze sensor data. The Enviro-Net Project encompasses several of such sensor system deployments across five countries in the Americas. These deployments use a few different ground-based sensor systems, installed at different heights monitoring the conditions in tropical dry forests over long periods of time. This paper presents our experience in deploying and maintaining these systems, retrieving and pre-processing the data, and describes the Web portal developed to help with data management, visualization and analysis.

References

[1]  Rundel, PW; Graham, EA; Allen, MF; Fisher, JC; Harmon, TC. Environmental sensor networks in ecological research. New Phytol 2009, 182, 589–607.
[2]  Porter, J; Arzberger, P; Braun, HW; Bryant, P; Gage, S; Hansen, T; Hanson, P; Lin, CC; Lin, FP; Kratz, T; et al. Wireless sensor networks for ecology. BioScience 2005, 55, 561–572.
[3]  Hart, JK; Martinez, K. Environmental sensor networks: A revolution in the earth system science? Earth-Sci. Rev 2006, 78, 177–191.
[4]  Estrin, D; Michener, W; Bonito, G. Environmental Cyberinfrastructure Needs for Distributed Networks. Technical report for Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network; Scripps Institution of Oceanography: La Jolla, CA, USA, August 2003. Available online: http://www.lternet.edu/sensor_report/ (accessed on 20 April 2011).
[5]  Schwartz, MD. Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003.
[6]  Keller, M; Schimel, DS; Hargrove, WW; Hoffman, FM. A continental strategy for the National Ecological Observatory Network. Front. Ecol. Environ 2008, 6, 282–284.
[7]  Baldocchi, D; Falge, E; Gu, L; Olson, R; Hollinger, D; Running, S; Anthoni, P; Bernhofer, C; Davis, K; Evans, R. FLUXNET: A new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc 2001, 82, 2415–2434.
[8]  Humphrey, M; Agarwal, D; van Ingen, C. Fluxdata.org: Publication and Curation of Shared Scientific Climate and Earth Sciences Data. Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on e-Science (e-Science’09), Oxford, UK, 9–11 December 2009; pp. 118–125.
[9]  Delin, KA. The sensor web: A macro-instrument for coordinated sensing. Sensors 2002, 2, 270–285.
[10]  Teillet, PM. Sensor webs: A geostrategic technology for integrated earth sensing. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens 2010, 3, 473–480.
[11]  Botts, M; Percivall, G; Reed, C; Davidson, J. OGC?Sensor Web Enablement: Overview and High Level Architecture. In GeoSensor Networks; Nittel, S, Labrinidis, A, Stefanidis, A, Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2008; Volume 4540, pp. 175–190.
[12]  Chong, CY; Kumar, SP. Sensor networks: Evolution, opportunities, and challenges. Proc. IEEE 2003, 91, 1247–1256.
[13]  Martinez, K; Hart, JK; Ong, R. Environmental Sensor Networks. IEEE Comput 2004, 37, 50–56.
[14]  Hamilton, MP; Graham, EA; Rundel, PW; Allen, MF; Kaiser, W; Hansen, MH; Estrin, DL. New approaches in embedded networked sensing for terrestrial ecological observatories. Environ. Eng. Sci 2007, 24, 192–204.
[15]  Porter, JH; Nagy, E; Kratz, TK; Hanson, P; Collins, SL; Arzberger, P. New eyes on the world: Advanced sensors for ecology. BioScience 2009, 59, 385–397.
[16]  Lee, W; Alchanatis, V; Yang, C; Hirafuji, M; Moshou, D; Li, C. Sensing technologies for precision specialty crop production. Comput. Electroni. Agric 2010, 74, 2–33.
[17]  Matese, A; Di Gennaro, SF; Zaldei, A; Genesio, L; Vaccari, FP. A wireless sensor network for precision viticulture: The NAV system. Comput. Electron. Agric 2009, 69, 51–58.
[18]  Aquino-Santos, R; González-Potes, A; Edwards-Block, A; Virgen-Ortiz, RA. Developing a new wireless sensor network platform and its application in precision agriculture. Sensors 2011, 11, 1192–1211.
[19]  Mainwaring, A; Polastre, J; Szewczyk, R; Culler, D; Anderson, J. Wireless Sensor Networks for Habitat Monitoring. Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (WSNA’02), Atlanta, GA, USA, September 2002; pp. 88–97.
[20]  Barrenetxea, G; Ingelrest, F; Schaefer, G; Vetterli, M. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Successful Wireless Sensor Network Deployments. Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems (SenSys’08), Raleigh, NC, USA, 5–7 November 2008; pp. 43–56.
[21]  Ingelrest, F; Barrenetxea, G; Schaefer, G; Vetterli, M; Couach, O; Parlange, M. SensorScope: Application-specific sensor network for environmental monitoring. ACM Trans Sens Netw (TOSN) 2010, 6, 17:1–17:32.
[22]  Wang, L; Yang, Y; Noh, DK; Le, HK; Liu, J; Abdelzaher, TF; Ward, M. AdaptSens: An Adaptive Data Collection and Storage Service for Solar-Powered Sensor Networks. Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Real-Time Systems Symp. (RTSS’09), Washington, DC, USA, 1–4 December 2009; pp. 303–312.
[23]  Mo, L; He, Y; Liu, Y; Zhao, J; Tang, SJ; Li, XY; Dai, G. Canopy closure estimates with GreenOrbs: Sustainable sensing in the forest. Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys’09), Berkeley, CA, USA, 4–6 November 2009; pp. 99–112.
[24]  Selavo, L; Wood, A; Cao, Q; Sookoor, T; Liu, H; Srinivasan, A; Wu, Y; Kang, W; Stankovic, J; Young, D; et al. LUSTER: Wireless sensor network for environmental research. Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys’07), Sydney, Australia, 4–9 November 2007; pp. 103–116.
[25]  Ming, X; Yabo, D; Dongming, L; Ping, X; Gang, L. A Wireless Sensor System for Long-Term Microclimate Monitoring in Wildland Cultural Heritage Sites. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications (ISPA’08), Sydney, Australia, 10–12 December 2008; pp. 207–214.
[26]  Wark, T; Hu, W; Corke, P; Hodge, J; Keto, A; Mackey, B; Foley, G; Sikka, P; Brünig, M. Springbrook: Challenges in developing a long-term, rainforest wireless sensor network. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP’08), Sydney, Australia, 15–18 December 2008; pp. 599–604.
[27]  Werner-Allen, G; Lorincz, K; Johnson, J; Lees, J; Welsh, M. Fidelity and yield in a volcano monitoring sensor network. Proceedings of the 7th Symp on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI’06), Seattle, WA, USA, 6–8 November 2006; pp. 381–396.
[28]  Welsh, M. Sensor networks for the sciences. Commun. ACM 2010, 53, 36–39.
[29]  Tolle, G; Polastre, J; Szewczyk, R; Culler, D; Turner, N; Tu, K; Burgess, S; Dawson, T; Buonadonna, P; Gay, D; et al. A Macroscope in the Redwoods. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys’05), San Diego, CA, USA, 2–4 November 2005; pp. 51–63.
[30]  Langendoen, K; Baggio, A; Visser, O. Murphy loves potatoes: Experiences from a pilot sensor network deployment in precision agriculture. Proceedings of the 20th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symp (IPDPS 2006), Rhodes Island, Greece, 25–29 April 2006.
[31]  Szewczyk, R; Polastre, J; Mainwaring, A; Culler, D. Lessons from a Sensor Network Expedition. In Wireless Sensor Networks; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2004; Volume 2920, pp. 307–322.
[32]  Jiménez, VPG; Armada, AG. Field measurements and guidelines for the application of wireless sensor networks to the environment and security. Sensors 2009, 9, 10309–10325.
[33]  Mus?loiu-E, R; Terzis, A; Szlavecz, K; Szalay, A; Cogan, J; Gray, J. Life under Your Feet: A Wireless Soil Ecology Sensor Network. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors (EmNets’06), Cambridge, MA, USA, 30–31 May 2006.
[34]  Olken, F; Gruenwald, L. Data stream management: Aggregation, classification, modeling, and operator placement. IEEE Internet Comput 2008, 12, 9–12.
[35]  Ozer, S; Gray, J; Szalay, A; Terzis, A; Mus?loiu-E, R; Szlavecz, K; Burns, R; Cogan, J. Data analysis tools for sensor-based science. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys’06), Boulder, CO, USA, 31 October–3 November 2006; pp. 341–342.
[36]  Aberer, K; Hauswirth, M; Salehi, A. Infrastructure for Data Processing in Large-Scale Interconnected Sensor Networks. Proceedings of the 8th the Int Conf on Mobile Data Management (MDM’07), Mannheim, Germany, 7–11 May 2007; pp. 198–205.
[37]  Stojkoska, B; Davcev, D. Web Interface for Habitat Monitoring Using Wireless Sensor Network. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications (ICWMC’09), Cannes, France, 23–29 August 2009; pp. 157–162.
[38]  Karasti, H; Baker, KS. Digital data practices and the long term ecological research program growing global. Int. J. Digital Curation 2008, 3, 42–58.
[39]  Borgman, CL; Wallis, JC; Mayernik, MS; Pepe, A. Drowning in data: Digital library architecture to support scientific use of embedded sensor networks. Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conf. on Digital Libraries (JCDL’07), Vancouver, Canada, 17–22 June 2007; pp. 269–277.
[40]  Wallis, J; Borgman, C; Mayernik, M; Pepe, A; Ramanathan, N; Hansen, M. Know Thy Sensor: Trust, Data Quality, and Data Integrity in Scientific Digital Libraries. In Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries; Kovács, L, Fuhr, N, Meghini, C, Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2007; Volume 4675, pp. 380–391.
[41]  Lukac, M; Stubailo, I; Guy, R; Davis, P; Puruhuaya, VA; Clayton, R; Estrin, D. First-class meta-data: A step towards a highly reliable wireless seismic network in Peru. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Sensor Networks for Earth and Space Science Applications (ESSA’10), San Francisco, CA, USA, April 2009.
[42]  Dawes, N; Kumar, KA; Michel, S; Aberer, K; Lehning, M. Sensor Metadata Management and Its Application in Collaborative Environmental Research. Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on eScience, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 7–12 December 2008; pp. 143–150.
[43]  Casola, V; Gaglione, A; Mazzeo, A. A Reference Architecture for Sensor Networks Integration and Management. Proceedings of the 3rd Int Conf on GeoSensor Networks (GSN’09), Oxford, UK, July 2009; pp. 158–168.
[44]  Gupta, V; Udupi, P; Poursohi, A. Early lessons from building Sensor.Network: An open data exchange for the web of things. Proceedings of the 8th IEEE Int. Conf. on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM’10 Workshops), Mannheim, Germany, 29 March–2 April 2010; pp. 738–744.
[45]  Raman, B; Chebrolu, K. Censor networks: A critique of “sensor networks” from a systems perspective. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev 2008, 38, 75–78.
[46]  Huemmrich, KF; Black, TA; Jarvis, PG; McCaughey, JH; Hall, FG. High temporal resolution NDVI phenology from micrometeorological radiation sensors. J. Geophys. Res 1999, 104, 27935–27944.
[47]  Jenkins, JP; Richardson, AD; Braswell, BH; Ollinger, SV; Hollinger, DY; Smith, ML. Refining light-use efficiency calculations for a deciduous forest canopy using simultaneous tower-based carbon flux and radiometric measurements. Agric. For. Meteorol 2007, 143, 64–79.
[48]  Wilson, TB; Meyers, TP. Determining vegetation indices from solar and photosynthetically active radiation fluxes. Agric. For. Meteorol 2007, 144, 160–179.
[49]  Rocha, AV; Shaver, GR. Advantages of a two band EVI calculated from solar and photosynthetically active radiation fluxes. Agric. For. Meteorol 2009, 149, 1560–1563.
[50]  Fuchs, M; Asrar, G; Kanemasu, ET; Hipps, LE. Leaf area estimates from measurements of photosynthetically active radiation in wheat canopies. Agric. For. Meteorol 1984, 32, 13–22.
[51]  ?anchez-Azofeifa, GA; Kalácska, M; do Espírito-Santo, MM; Fernandes, GW; Schnitzer, S. Tropical dry forest succession and the contribution of lianas to wood area index (WAI). For. Ecol. Manage 2009, 258, 941–948.
[52]  Arzberger, P; Farazdel, A; Konagaya, A; Ang, L; Shimojo, S; Stevens, R. Life sciences and cyberinfrastructure: Dual and interacting revolutions that will drive future science. New Gener. Comput 2004, 22, 97–110.
[53]  JPL–NASA. Planetary Data System Standards Reference. Technical Report JPL D-7669, Part 2; Jet Propulsion Laboratory: Pasadena, CA, USA, 2009. Available online: http://pds.nasa.gov/tools/standards-reference.shtml (accessed on 20 April 2011).
[54]  Gupchup, J; Mus?loiu-E, R; Szalay, A; Terzis, A. Sundial: Using Sunlight to Reconstruct Global Timestamps. In Wireless Sensor Networks; Roedig, U, Sreenan, C, Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2009; Volume 5432, pp. 183–198.
[55]  Sundararaman, B; Buy, U; Kshemkalyani, AD. Clock synchronization for wireless sensor networks: A survey. Ad Hoc Netw 2005, 3, 281–323.
[56]  Curry, R; Kiddle, C; Simmonds, R; Pastorello, GZ. An on-line collaborative data management system. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE’10), New Orleans, LA, USA, 14 November 2010; pp. 1–10.
[57]  Muraoka, H; Koizumi, H. Satellite Ecology (SATECO)–linking ecology, remote sensing and micrometeorology, from plot to regional scale, for the study of ecosystem structure and function. J. Plant Res 2009, 122, 3–20.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133