ESA’s upcoming satellite Sentinel-2 will provide Earth images of high spatial, spectral and temporal resolution and aims to ensure continuity for Landsat and SPOT observations. In comparison to the latter sensors, Sentinel-2 incorporates three new spectral bands in the red-edge region, which are centered at 705, 740 and 783 nm. This study addresses the importance of these new bands for the retrieval and monitoring of two important biophysical parameters: green leaf area index (LAI) and chlorophyll content (Ch). With data from several ESA field campaigns over agricultural sites (SPARC, AgriSAR, CEFLES2) we have evaluated the efficacy of two empirical methods that specifically make use of the new Sentinel-2 bands. First, it was shown that LAI can be derived from a generic normalized difference index (NDI) using hyperspectral data, with 674 nm with 712 nm as best performing bands. These bands are positioned closely to the Sentinel-2 B4 (665 nm) and the new red-edge B5 (705 nm) band. The method has been applied to simulated Sentinel-2 data. The resulting green LAI map was validated against field data of various crop types, thereby spanning a LAI between 0 and 6, and yielded a RMSE of 0.6. Second, the recently developed “Normalized Area Over reflectance Curve” (NAOC), an index that derives Ch from hyperspectral data, was studied on its compatibility with simulated Sentinel-2 data. This index integrates the reflectance curve between 643 and 795 nm, thereby including the new Sentinel-2 bands in the red-edge region. We found that these new bands significantly improve the accuracy of Ch estimation. Both methods emphasize the importance of red-edge bands for operational estimation of biophysical parameters from Sentinel-2.
References
[1]
ESA. GMES Sentinel-2 Mission Requirements Document, Available online: http://esamultimedia.esa.int/docs/GMES/GMES_Sentinel2_MRD_issue_2.0_update.pdf (accessed on 30 April 2011).
[2]
ESA. ESA’s Sentinel Satellites . Available online: http://www.esa.int/esaLP/SEMM4T4KXMF_LPgmes_0.html (accessed on 30 April 2011).
[3]
Whittaker, RH; Marks, L. Methods of assessing terrestrial productivity. In Primary Productivity of the Biosphere; Lieth, H, Whittaker, RH, Eds.; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 1975.
[4]
Wang, K; Franklin, SE; Guo, X; Cattet, M. Remote sensing of ecology, biodiversity and conservation: A review from the perspective of remote sensing specialists. Sensors 2010, 10, 9647–9667.
[5]
Lichtenthaler, HK; Lang, M; Sowinska, M; Heisel, F; Miehe, JA. Detection of vegetation stress via a new high resolution fluorescence imaging system. J. Plant Physiol. 1996, 148, 599–612.
[6]
Sampson, PH; Zarco-Tejada, PJ; Mohammed, GH; Miller, JR; Noland, TL; Fleming, RL. Hyperspectral remote sensing of forest condition: Estimation of chlorophyll content in tolerant hardwoods. For. Sci. 2003, 49, 381–391.
[7]
Gitelson, AA; Vi？a, A; Verma, SB; Rundquist, DC; Arkebauer, TJ; Keydan, G; Leavitt, B; Ciganda, V; Burba, GG; Suyker, AE. Relationship between gross primary production and chlorophyll content in crops: Implications for the synoptic monitoring of vegetation productivity. J. Geophys. Res. 2006, 111, D08S11.
[8]
Jonckheere, I; Fleck, S; Nackaerts, K; Muys, B; Coppin, P; Weiss, M; Baret, F. Methods for leaf area index determination. Part I: Theories, techniques and instruments. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2004, 121, 19–35.
[9]
Scurlock, JMO; Asner, GP; Gower, ST. Worldwide Historical Estimates and Bibliography of Leaf Area Index, 1932–2000. ORNL Technical Memorandum TM-2001/268; Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Oak Ridge, TN, USA, 2001.
[10]
Badhwar, GD; MacDonald, RB; Mehta, NC. Satellite-derived leaf-area-indec and vegetation maps as input to global carbon cycle models—A hierarchical approach. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1986, 7, 265–281.
[11]
Townsend, AR; Vitousek, PM; Holland, EA. Tropical soils could dominate the shortterm carbon cycle feedbacks to increased global temperatures. Clim. Change 1992, 22, 293–303.
[12]
Baret, F; Guyot, G. Potentials and limits of vegetation indices for LAI and APAR assessment. Remote Sens. Environ. 1991, 35, 161–173.
[13]
Bicheron, P; Leroy, M. A Method of biophysical parameter retrieval at global scale by inversion of a vegetation reflectance model. Remote Sens. Environ. 1999, 67, 251–266.
[14]
Buermann, W; Dong, J; Zeng, X; Myneni, RB; Dickinson, RE. Evaluation of the utility of satellite-based vegetation leaf area index data for climate simulations. J. Clim. 2001, 14, 3536–3550.
[15]
Kamalesh, VL; Luckman, A; Grey, WMF; Milton, EJ. Estimation of Leaf area Index from PROBA/CHRIS Hyperspectral, Multi-Angular Data. Proceedings of the Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Society Conference 2008 “Measuring change in the Earth System”, Exeter, UK, 15–17 September 2008.
Goel, NS. Models of vegetation canopy reflectance and their use in the estimation of biophysical parameters from reflectance data. Remote Sens. Rev. 1987, 3, 1–212.
[18]
Jacquemoud, S; Baret, F; Andrieu, B; Danson, FM; Jaggard, K. Extraction of vegetation biophysical parameters by inversion of the PROSPECT+SAIL model on sugar beet canopy reflectance data—Application to TM data. Remote Sens. Environ. 1995, 52, 163–172.
[19]
Gobron, N; Pinty, B; Verstraete, MM; Widlowski, JL. Advanced vegetation indices optimized for up-coming sensors: Design, performance and applications. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2000, 38, 2489–2505.
[20]
Houborg, R; Boegh, E. Mapping leaf chlorophyll and leaf area index using inverse and forward canopy reflectance modeling and SPOT reflectance data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2008, 112, 186–202.
[21]
Zheng, G; Moskal, LM. Retrieving leaf area index (LAI) using remote sensing: Theories, methods and sensors. Sensors 2009, 4, 2719–2745.
[22]
González-Sanpedro, MC; Le Toan, T; Moreno, J; Kergoat, L; Rubio, E. Seasonal variations of leaf area index of agricultural fields retrieved from Landsat data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2008, 112, 810–824.
[23]
Combal, B; Baret, F; Weiss, M; Trubuil, A; Macé, D; Pragnére, A; Myneni, R; Knyazikhin, Y; Wang, L. Retrieval of canopy biophysical variables from bidirectional reflectance data. Using prior information to solve the ill-posed inverse problem. Remote Sens. Environ. 2002, 84, 1–15.
[24]
Atzberger, C. Object-based retrieval of biophysical canopy variables using artificial neural nets and radiative transfer models. Remote Sens. Environ. 2004, 93, 53–67.
[25]
Espa？a, M; Baret, L; Aries, F; Chelle, F; Andrieu, B; Prévot, L. Modeling maize canopy 3D architecture application to reflectance simulation. Ecol. Model. 1999, 122, 25–43.
[26]
Casa, R; Baret, F; Buis, S; Lopez-Lozano, R; Pascucci, S; Palombo, A; Jones, HG. Estimation of maize canopy properties from remote sensing by inversion of 1-D and 4-D models. Precis. Agric. 2010, 11, 319–334.
[27]
Richter, K; Atzberger, C; Vuolo, F; Weihs, P; D’Urso, G. Experimental assessment on the Sentinel-2 band setting for RTM-based LAI retrieval of sugar beet and maize. Can. J. Remote Sens. 2009, 35, 230–247.
[28]
Broge, NH; Mortensen, JV. Deriving green crop area index and canopy chlorophyll density of winter wheat from spectral reflectance data. Remote Sens. Environ 2002, 81, 45–57.
[29]
Rondeaux, G. Analysis of Soil Spectral Properties with the GER Single Field-of-View IRIS. Internal report; Geography Department, University of Nottingham: Nottingham, UK, 1995.
[30]
Jago, RA; Cutler, MEJ; Curran, PJ. Estimating canopy chlorophyll concentration from field and airborne spectra. Remote Sens. Environ. 1999, 68, 217–224.
[31]
Haboudane, D; Miller, JR; Pattey, E; Zarco-Tejada, PJ; Strachan, IS. Hyperspectral vegetation indices and novel algorithms for predicting green LAI of crop canopies: Modeling and validation in the context of precision agriculture. Remote Sens. Environ. 2004, 90, 337–352.
[32]
Verrelst, J; Schaepman, ME; Koetz, B; Kneubuhler, M. Angular sensitivity analysis of vegetation indices derived from CHRIS/PROBA data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2008, 112, 2341–2353.
[33]
Verrelst, J; Schaepman, ME; Malenovsky, Z; Clevers, JGPW. Effects of woody elements on simulated canopy reflectance: Implications for forest chlorophyll content retrieval. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114, 647–656.
[34]
Stagakis, S; Markos, N; Sykioti, O; Kyparissis, A. Monitoring canopy biophysical and biochemical parameters in ecosystem scale using satellite hyperspectral imagery: An application on a Phlomis fruticosa Mediterranean ecosystem using multiangular CHRIS/PROBA observations. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114, 977–994.
[35]
Delegido, J; Alonso, L; González, G; Moreno, J. Estimating chlorophyll content of crops using a Normalized Area Over reflectance Curve (NAOC) and hyperspectral images. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2010, 12, 165–174.
[36]
Bannari, A; Khurshid, KS; Staenz, K; Schwarz, JW. A comparison of hyperspectral chlorophyll indices for wheat crop chlorophyll content estimation using laboratory reflectance measurements. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2007, 45, 3063–3074.
Haboudane, D; Tremblay, N; Miller, JR; Vigneault, P. Remote estimation of crop chlorophyll content using spectral indices derived from hyperspectral data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2008, 46, 423–437.
[39]
Rouse, JW; Haas, RH; Schell, JA; Deering, DW. Monitoring Vegetation Systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. Proceedings of the Third ERTS Symposium, Washington, DC, USA, 10–14 December 1973; pp. 309–317.
[40]
Pu, R; Gong, P; Tian, Y; Miao, X; Carruthers, RI; Anderson, GL. Using classification and NDVI differencing methods for monitoring sparse vegetation coverage: A case study of saltcedar in Nevada, USA. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2008, 29, 3987–4011.
[41]
Glenn, EP; Huete, AR; Nagler, PL; Nelson, SG. Relationship between remotely-sensed vegetation indices, canopy attributes and plant physiological processes: What vegetation indices can and cannot tell us about the landscape. Sensors 2008, 8, 2136–2160.
[42]
Fava, F; Colombo, R; Bocchi, S; Meroni, M; Sitzia, M; Fois, N; Zucca, C. Identification of hyperspectral vegetation indices for Mediterranean pasture characterization. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2009, 11, 233–243.
[43]
Daughtry, CST; Walthall, CL; Kim, MS; Brown, E; McMurtrey, JE. Estimating corn leaf chlorophyll concentration from leaf and canopy reflectance. Remote Sens. Environ. 2000, 74, 229–239.
[44]
Haboudane, D; Miller, JR; Tremblay, N; Zarco-Tejada, PJ; Dextraze, L. Integrated narrow-band vegetation indices for prediction of crop chlorophyll content for application to precision agriculture. Remote Sens. Environ. 2002, 81, 416–426.
[45]
Dash, J; Curran, PJ. The MERIS terrestrial chlorophyll index. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2005, 25, 5403–5413.
[46]
He, Y; Mui, A. Scaling up semi-arid grassland biochemical content from the leaf to the canopy level: Challenges and opportunities. Sensors 2010, 10, 11072–11087.
[47]
Sims, DA; Gamon, JA. Relationships between leaf pigment content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structures and developmental stages. Remote Sens. Environ. 2002, 81, 337–354.
[48]
Gitelson, AA; Merzlyak, MN. Spectral reflectance changes associated with autumn senescence of aesculus Hippocastanum L. and Acer Platanoides L. leaves. Spectral features and relation to chlorophyll estimation. J. Plant Physiol. 1994, 143, 286–292.
[49]
Clevers, JGPW; de Jong, SM; Epema, GF; van der Meer, F; Bakker, WH; Skidmore, AK; Scholte, KH. Derivation of the red edge index using MERIS standard band setting. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2002, 23, 3169–3184.
[50]
Zhao, D; Huang, L; Li, J; Qi, J. A comparative analysis of broadband and narrowband derived vegetation indices in predicting LAI and CCD of a cotton canopy. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2007, 62, 25–33.
[51]
Le Maire, G; Fran？ois, C; Soudani, K; Berveiller, D; Pontailler, S; Bréda, N; Genet, H; Davi, H; Dufrêne, E. Calibration and validation of hyperspectral indices for the estimation of broadleaved forest leaf chlorophyll content, leaf mass per area, leaf area index and leaf canopy biomass. Remote Sens. Environ. 2008, 112, 3846–3864.
[52]
Chen, JM; Pavlic, G; Brown, L; Cihlar, J; Leblanc, SG; White, HP; Hall, RJ; Peddle, DR; King, DJ; Trofymow, JA. Derivation and validation of Canada-wide coarse-resolution leaf area index maps using high-resolution satellite imagery and ground measurements. Remote Sens. Environ. 2002, 80, 165–184.
[53]
Darvishzadeh, R; Skidmore, A; Atzberger, C; Wieren, S. Estimation of vegetation LAI from hyperspectral reflectance data: Effects of soil type and plant architecture. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2008, 10, 358–373.
[54]
Delegido, J; Verrelst, J; Alonso, L; Moreno, J. A simple model for estimation of crop green LAI from satellite images. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2011. submitted for publication.
[55]
Verrelst, J; Alonso, L; Camps-Valls, G; Delegido, J; Moreno, J. Retrieval of canopy parameters using gaussian processes techniques. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2011. in press.
[56]
ESA. GMES Sentinel-2 Mission Requirements Document . Available online: http://esamultimedia.esa.int/docs/GMES/Sentinel-2_MRD.pdf (accessed on 30 April 2011).
[57]
Moreno, J; Alonso, L; Fernández, G; Fortea, JC; Gandía, S; Guanter, L; García, JC; Martí, JM. The Spectra Barrax Campaing (SPARC): Overview and First Results from Chris Data. Proceedings of the 2nd CHRIS/Proba Workshop, Frascati, Italy, 28–30 April 2004.
[58]
Gandía, S; Moreno, J; Sagardoy, R; Morales, F; Verch, G. Crop Photosynthetic Pigment Composition and Calibration of an Instrument for Indirect Chlorophyll Content Determination. Proceedings of the Final Workshop for AGRISAR and EAGLE Campaigns, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 15–16 October 2007.
[59]
ESA. Agricultural Bio-/Geophysical Retrievals from Frequent Repeat SAR and Optical Imaging, Agrisar 2006. Final Report; European Space Agency (ESA): Paris, Frence, 2008.
[60]
Rascher, U; Agati, G; Alonso, L; Champagne, S; Colombo, R; Damm, A; Daumard, F; de Miguel, E; Fernandez, G; et al. CEFLES2: The remote sensing component to quantify photosynthetic efficiency from the leaf to the region by measuring sun-induced fluorescence in the oxygen absorption bands. Biogeosciences 2009, 6, 1181–1198.
[61]
Delegido, J; Fernández, G; Gandía, S; Moreno, J. Retrieval of chlorophyll content and LAI of crops using hyperspectral techniques: Application to Proba/CHRIS data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2008, 29, 7107–7127.
[62]
Fernández-Renau, A; Gómez, JA; De Miguel, E. The INTA AHS system. Proc. SPIE 2005, 5978, 471–478.
[63]
Canisius, F; Fernandes, R; Chen, J. Comparison and evaluation of medium resolution imaging spectrometer leaf area index products across a range of land use. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114, 950–960.
[64]
Darvishzadeh, R; Skidmore, A; Schlerf, M; Atzberger, C; Corsi, F; Cho, M. LAI and chlorophyll estimation for a heterogeneous grassland using hyperspectral measurements. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens 2008, 63, 409–426.
[65]
Gitelson, AA; Vi？a, A; Ciganda, V; Rundquist, DC; Arkebauer, TJ. Remote estimation of canopy chlorophyll content in crops. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2005, 32, L08403.
[66]
Smith, KL; Steven, MD; Colls, JJ. Use of hyperspectral derivative ratios in the red edge region to identify plant stress responses to gas leak. Remote Sens. Environ. 2004, 92, 207–217.
[67]
Gallego, FJ. Review of the Main Remote Sensing Methods for Crop Area Estimates. In Workshop Proceedings: Remote Sensing Support to Crop Yield Forecast and Area Estimates. In , Stresa, Italy, November 30–December 1 2006. Volume XXXVI, Part 8/W48; pp. 65–70.
[68]
Hermann, I; Pimstein, A; Karnieli, A; Cohen, Y; Alchanatis, V; Bonfil, DJ. LAI assessment of wheat and potato by VENμS and Sentinel-2 bands. Remote Sens. Environ. 2011, 115, 2141–2151.
[69]
Liang, S. Recent developments in estimating land surface biogeophysical variables from optical remote sensing. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2007, 31, 501–516.
[70]
Atzberger, C; Guérif, M; Baret, F; Werner, W. Comparative analysis of three chemometric techniques for the spectroradiometric assessment of canopy chlorophyll content in winter wheat. J. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2010, 73, 165–173.
[71]
Smola, J; Sch？lkopf, B. A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat. Comput. 2004, 14, 199–222.
[72]
Baret, F; Hagolle, O; Geiger, B; Bicheron, P; Miras, B; Huc, M; Berthelot, B; Ni？o, F; Weiss, M; Samain, O; et al. LAI, fAPAR and fCover CYCLOPES global products derived from VEGETATION - Part 1: Principles of the algorithm. Remote Sens. Environ. 2007, 110, 275–286.
[73]
Camps-Valls, G; Bruzzone, L; Rojo-Alvarez, JL; Melgani, F. Robust support vector regression for biophysical variable estimation from remotely sensed images. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2006, 3, 339–343.
