Plasma process tools, which usually cost several millions of US dollars, are often used in the semiconductor fabrication etching process. If the plasma process is halted due to some process fault, the productivity will be reduced and the cost will increase. In order to maximize the product/wafer yield and tool productivity, a timely and effective fault process detection is required in a plasma reactor. The classification of fault events can help the users to quickly identify fault processes, and thus can save downtime of the plasma tool. In this work, optical emission spectroscopy (OES) is employed as the metrology sensor for in-situ process monitoring. Splitting into twelve different match rates by spectrum bands, the matching rate indicator in our previous work (Yang, R.; Chen, R.S. Sensors 2010, 10, 5703-5723) is used to detect the fault process. Based on the match data, a real-time classification of plasma faults is achieved by a novel method, developed in this study. Experiments were conducted to validate the novel fault classification. From the experimental results, we may conclude that the proposed method is feasible inasmuch that the overall accuracy rate of the classification for fault event shifts is 27 out of 28 or about 96.4% in success.
References
[1]
Hong, SJ; May, GS. Neural network based time series modeling of optical emission spectroscopy data for fault detection in reactive ion etching. Proc SPIE 2003, 5041, doi:10.1117/12.485230..
[2]
Bunkofske, R; Ambrozic, C; Sanders, M. The Use of Multivariate Statistical Techniques in Semiconductor Manufacturing. Proceedings of the AEC/APC Symposium XIII, Banff, AB, Canada, 6–11 October 2001.
[3]
Ison, AM; Li, W; Spanos, CJ. Fault Diagnosis of Plasma Etch Equipment. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing, San Francisco, CA, USA, 6–8 October 1997; pp. B49–B52.
[4]
Love, PL; Simaan, M. A Knowledge-Based System for the Detection and Diagnosis of Out-of-Control Events in Manufacturing Processes. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, Arlington, VA, USA, 25–26 September 1989; pp. 2394–2399.
[5]
May, GS; Spanos, CJ. Automated malfunction diagnosis of semiconductor fabrication equipment: A plasma etch application. IEEE Trans. Semiconduct. Manuf 1993, 6, 28–40.
Wise, BM; Gallagher, NB; Martin, EB. Application of PARAFAC2 to fault detection and diagnosis in semiconductor etch. Chemometrics 2001, 15, 285–298.
[8]
Lada, EK; Lu, JC; Wilson, JR. A wavelet-based procedure for process fault detection. IEEE Trans. Semiconduct. Manuf 2002, 15, 79–90.
[9]
Gallagher, NB; Wise, BM. Development and Benchmarking of Multivariate Statistical Process Control Tools for A Semiconductor Etch Process: Improve Robustness Through Model Updating. Proceedings of the Safeprocess ’97, Hull, UK, 26–28 August 1997.
[10]
Anderson, H; Gunther, S; Fry, B. Plasma Etch Endpoint and Fault Detection Along with UV-Vis Absorption Spectroscopy from a Single Compact Solid State Detector. Proceedings of American Physical Society 54th Annual Gaseous Electronics Conference, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA, 9–12 October 2001.
[11]
Goodlin, BE; Carsten, S; Guenther, E. Simultaneous fault detection and classification for semiconductor manufacturing tools. J. Electrochem. Soc 2003, 150, 778–784.
[12]
Yang, R; Chen, RS. Real-time plasma process condition sensing and abnormal process detection. Sensors 2010, 10, 5703–5723.
