In the present study, novel dry-contact sensors for measuring electro-encephalography (EEG) signals without any skin preparation are designed, fabricated by an injection molding manufacturing process and experimentally validated. Conventional wet electrodes are commonly used to measure EEG signals; they provide excellent EEG signals subject to proper skin preparation and conductive gel application. However, a series of skin preparation procedures for applying the wet electrodes is always required and usually creates trouble for users. To overcome these drawbacks, novel dry-contact EEG sensors were proposed for potential operation in the presence or absence of hair and without any skin preparation or conductive gel usage. The dry EEG sensors were designed to contact the scalp surface with 17 spring contact probes. Each probe was designed to include a probe head, plunger, spring, and barrel. The 17 probes were inserted into a flexible substrate using a one-time forming process via an established injection molding procedure. With these 17 spring contact probes, the flexible substrate allows for high geometric conformity between the sensor and the irregular scalp surface to maintain low skin-sensor interface impedance. Additionally, the flexible substrate also initiates a sensor buffer effect, eliminating pain when force is applied. The proposed dry EEG sensor was reliable in measuring EEG signals without any skin preparation or conductive gel usage, as compared with the conventional wet electrodes.
References
[1]
Thakor, NV. Biopotentials and electro-physiology measurement. In The Measurement, Instrumentation, and Sensors Handbook; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1999.
[2]
Nunez, PL. Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1981.
[3]
Moser, E; Meyerspeer, M; Fischmeister, FPS; Grabner, G; Bauer, H; Trattnig, S. Windows on the human body in vivo high-field magnetic resonance research and applications in medicine and psychology. Sensors 2010, 10, 5724–5757.
[4]
Gevins, A; Le, J; Martin, NK; Brickett, P; Desmond, J; Reutter, B. High resolution EEG: 124-channel recording, spatial deblurring and MRI integration methods. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neuro 1994, 90, 337–358.
[5]
Lin, C-T; Wu, R-C; Liang, S-F; Chao, W-H; Chen, Y-J; Jung, T-P. EEG-based drowsiness estimation for safety driving using independent component analysis. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. I 2005, 52, 2726–2738.
[6]
Wenning, GK; Litvan, I; Verny, M; Ray-Chaudhuri, K; Granata, R; Poewe, W; Jellinger, K. Is EEG useful in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonism? Parkinsonism Relat. Disord 1998, 4, 79–80.
[7]
Sanders, S; Rowlinson, S; Manidakis, I; Ferrie, CD; Koutroumanidis, M. The contribution of the EEG technologists in the diagnosis of Panayiotopoulos syndrome (susceptibility to early onset benign childhood autonomic seizures). Seizure 2004, 13, 565–573.
[8]
Thakor, N. In the Spotlight: Neuroengineering. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng 2009, 2, 18–20.
[9]
Chi, YM; Jung, TP; Cauwenberghs, G. Dry-contact and noncontact biopotential electrodes: Methodological review. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng 2010, 3, 106–119.
[10]
Miller, HA; Harrison, DC. Biomedical Electrode Technology; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1974.
Roberto, M. The electrode-skin interface and optimal detection of bioelectric signals. Physiol Meas 2010, doi:10.1088/0967-3334/31/10/E01.
[13]
Wang, Y; Guo, K; Pei, W-H; Gui, Q; Li, X-Q; Chen, H-D; Yang, J-H. Fabrication of dry electrode for recording bio-potentials. Chin Phys Lett 2011, doi:10.1088/0256-307X/28/1/010701..
[14]
Ruffini, G; Dunne, S; Farrés, E; Marco-Pallarés, J; Ray, C; Mendoza, E; Silva, R; Grau, C. A dry electrophysiology electrode using CNT arrays. Sens. Actuat. A 2006, 132, 34–41.
[15]
Ko, L-W; Chiou, J-C; Lin, C-T; Hong, C-T; Jung, T-P; Liang, S-F; Jeng, J-L. Using novel MEMS EEG sensors in detecting drowsiness application. Proceedings of IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS 2006), London, UK, 29 November–1 December 2006; pp. 33–36.
[16]
Griss, P; Enoksson, P; Tolvanen-Laakso, HK; Meril？inen, P; Ollmar, S; Stemme, G. Micromachined electrodes for biopotential measurement. IEEE J. Microelectromech. Syst 2001, 10, 10–15.
[17]
Griss, P; Tolvanen-Laakso, HK; Meril？inen, P; Stemme, G. Characterization of micromachined spiked biopotentials electrodes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng 2002, 49, 597–604.
[18]
Ruffini, G; Dunne, S; Fuentemilla, L; Grau, C; Farr, E; Marco-Pallar, J; Watts, PCP; Silva, SRP. First human trials of a dry electrophysiology sensor using a carbon nanotube array interface. Sens. Actuat. A 2008, 144, 275–279.
[19]
Cristian, G; Voinescu, CD; Fazli, S. Bristle-sensors-low-cost flexible passive dry EEG electrodes for neurofeedback and BCI applications. J Neural Eng 2011, 8, 025008:1–025008:8.
[20]
Anna, G; Hansen, S; Muller, J. Novel dry electrodes for ECG monitoring. Physiol. Meas 2007, 28, 1375–1390.
[21]
Hoffmann, KP; Ruff, R. Flexible dry surface-electrodes for ECG long-term monitoring. Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, (EMBS 2007), Lyon, France, August 2007; pp. 5739–5742.
[22]
Baek, J-Y; An, J-H; Choi, J-M; Park, K-S; Lee, S-H. Flexible polymeric dry electrodes for the long-term monitoring of ECG. Sens. Actuat. A 2008, 143, 423–429.
[23]
Beckmann, L; Neuhaus, C; Medrano, G; Jungbecker, N; Walter, M; Gries, T; Leonhardt, S. Characterization of textile electrodes and conductors using standardized measurement setups. Physiol. Meas 2010, 31, 233–247.
Eric, WS; Peter, T; William, AS; Tobin, M; Theresa, MV; Robert, M. A novel dry electrode for brain-computer interface. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Part II: Novel Interaction Methods and Techniques, San Diego, CA, USA, 19–24 July 2009.
Matthews, R; Turner, PJ; McDonald, NJ; Ermolaev, K; Manus, TM; Shelby, RA; Steindorf, M. Real time workload classification from an ambulatory wireless EEG system using hybrid EEG electrodes. Proceedings of the 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS 2008), Vancouver, Canada, August 2008; pp. 5871–5875.
[29]
Gargiulo, G; Bifulco, P; McEwan, A; Nasehi Tehrani, J; Calvo, RA; Romano, M; Ruffo, M; Shephard, R; Cesarelli, M; Jin, C; Mohamed, A; van Schaik, A. Dry electrode bio-potential recordings. Proceedings of 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Buenos Aires, Argentina, 31 August–4 September 2010; pp. 6493–6496.
[30]
Fonseca, C; Cunha, JS; Martins, R; Ferreira, V; Sá, JMD; Barbosa, M; Silva, AMD. A novel dry active electrode for EEG recording. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng 2007, 45, 162–165.
[31]
Matthews, R; McDonald, NJ; Fridman, I; Hervieux, P; Nielsen, T. The invisible electrode-zero prep time, ultra low capacitive sensing. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (HCII), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 22–27 July 2005; pp. 22–27.
[32]
Popescu, F; Fazli, S; Badower, Y; Blankertz, B; Muller, K-R. Single trial classification of motor imagination using 6 dry EEG electrodes. PLoS ONE 2007, 2, e637.
[33]
Rao, R; Scherer, R. Brain-computer interfacing [In the Spotlight]. IEEE Signal Process. Mag 2010, 27, 152–150.
[34]
Beckmann, L; Neuhaus, C; Medrano, G; Jungbecker, N; Walter, M; Gries, T; Leonhardt, S. Characterization of textile electrodes and conductors using standardized measurement setups. Physiol. Meas 2010, 31, 233–247.
[35]
Webster, JG. Medical Instrumentation: Application and Design, 3rd ed ed.; John Wiley & Sons Inc: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1998.
[36]
Scharfetter, H; Merwa, R; Medrano, G; Ubl, A; Zimmermann, N; Gries, T; Leonhardt, S. Skin electrode impedance of textile electrodes for bioimpedance spectroscopy. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Electrical Bioimpedance and the 8th Conference on Electrical Impedance Tomography, Graz, Austria, 29 August–2 September 2007; Magjarevic, R, Nagel, JH, Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2007; pp. 260–263.
[37]
Grimnes, S. Impedance measurement of individual skin surface electrodes. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput 1983, 21, 750–755.
[38]
Searle, A; Kirkup, J. A direct comparison of wet, dry and insulating biolelectric recording electrodes. Physiol. Meas 2000, 21, 271–283.
