Koa (Acacia koa) forests are found across broad environmental gradients in the Hawai‘ian Islands. Previous studies have identified koa forest health problems and dieback at the plot level, but landscape level patterns remain unstudied. The availability of high-resolution satellite images from the new GeoEye1 satellite offers the opportunity to conduct landscape-level assessments of forest health. The goal of this study was to develop integrated remote sensing and geographic information systems (GIS) methodologies to characterize the health of koa forests and model the spatial distribution and variability of koa forest dieback patterns across an elevation range of 600–1,000 m asl in the island of Kaua‘i, which correspond to gradients of temperature and rainfall ranging from 17–20 °C mean annual temperature and 750–1,500 mm mean annual precipitation. GeoEye1 satellite imagery of koa stands was analyzed using supervised classification techniques based on the analysis of 0.5-m pixel multispectral bands. There was clear differentiation of native koa forest from areas dominated by introduced tree species and differentiation of healthy koa stands from those exhibiting dieback symptoms. The area ratio of healthy koa to koa dieback corresponded linearly to changes in temperature across the environmental gradient, with koa dieback at higher relative abundance in warmer areas. A landscape-scale map of healthy koa forest and dieback distribution demonstrated both the general trend with elevation and the small-scale heterogeneity that exists within particular elevations. The application of these classification techniques with fine spatial resolution imagery can improve the accuracy of koa forest inventory and mapping across the islands of Hawai‘i. Such findings should also improve ecological restoration, conservation and silviculture of this important native tree species.
References
[1]
Gagne, WC. Canopy-associated arthropods in Acacia koa and Metrosideros tree communities along an altitudinal transect on Hawai‘i Island. Pacific Insects 1979, 21, 56–82.
[2]
Pejchar, L; Holl, KD; Lockwood, JL. Hawai‘ian honeycreeper home range size varies with habitat: implications for native Acacia koa forestry. Ecol. Appl 2005, 15, 1053–1061, doi:10.1890/04-0577.
[3]
Scowcroft, PG; Haraguchi, JE; Hue, NV. Reforestation and topography affect montane soil properties, nitrogen pools, and nitrogen transformations in Hawai‘i. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J 2004, 68, 959–968, doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.0959.
[4]
Scowcroft, PG; Jeffrey, J. Potential significance of frost, topographic relief, and Acacia koa stands to restoration of mesic Hawai‘ian forests on abandoned rangeland. Forest Ecol. Manag 1999, 114, 447–458, doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00374-0.
[5]
Elevitch, CR; Wilkinson, K; Friday, JB. Acacia koa (koa) and Acacia koaia (koai‘a). In Traditional Trees of Pacific Islands; Elevitch, CR, Ed.; Permanent Agriculture Resources: Hōlualoa, HI, USA, 2006; pp. 1–28.
[6]
Ares, A; Fownes, JH. Water supply regulates structure, productivity, and water use efficiency of Acacia koa forest in Hawai‘i. Oecologia 1999, 121, 458–466, doi:10.1007/s004420050952.
[7]
Harrington, RA; Fownes, JH; Meinzer, FC; Scowcroft, PG. Forest growth along a rainfall gradient in Hawai‘i: Acacia koa stand structure, productivity, foliar nutrients, and water- and nutrient-use efficiencies. Oecologia 1995, 102, 277–284, doi:10.1007/BF00329794.
[8]
Idol, T; Baker, PJ; Meason, D. Indicators of forest ecosystem productivity and nutrient status across precipitation and temperature gradients in Hawai‘i. J. Trop. Ecol 2007, 23, 693–704.
[9]
Anderson, RC; Gardner, DE; Daehler, CC; Meinzer, FC. Dieback of Acacia koa in Hawai‘i: Ecological and pathological characteristics of affected stands. Forest Ecol. Manag 2002, 162, 273–286, doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00522-9.
[10]
Anderson, RC; Gardner, DE. Investigations of koa (Acacia koa) decline in Hawai‘ian forests. Proceedings of the Hawai‘i Conservation Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA, 30–31 July 1998; p. 15.
[11]
Daehler, CC; Dudley, N. Impact of the black twig borer, an introduced insect pest, on Acacia koa in the Hawai‘ian Islands. Micronesica Suppl 2002, 6, 35–53.
[12]
Soudani, K; Francois, C; Maire, GL; Dantec, VL; Dufrene, E. Comparative analysis of Ikonos, Spot, and ETM data for leaf area index estimation in temperate coniferous and deciduous forest stands. Remote Sens. Environ 2006, 102, 161–175, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.02.004.
[13]
Carleer, AP; Wolff, E. Explotation of very high resolution satellite data for tree species identification. Photogram. Eng. Remote Sens 2004, 70, 135–140.
[14]
Guo, Q; Kelly, M; Gong, P; Liu, D. An object-based classification approach in mapping tree mortality using high spatial resolution imagery. GISci. Remote Sens 2007, 44, 24–47, doi:10.2747/1548-1603.44.1.24.
[15]
Martinez Morales, R; Miura, T; Idol, T. An assessment of Hawai‘ian dry forest condition with fine resolution remote sensing. Forest Ecol. Manage 2008, 255, 2524–2532, doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.049.
[16]
Clark, DB; Read, JM; Clark, M; Murillo Cruz, A; Fallas Dotti, M; Clark, DA. Application of 1-m and 4-m resolution satellite data to studies of tree demography, stand structure and land use classification in tropical rain forest landscapes. Ecol. Appl 2004, 14, 16–74.
[17]
Kayitakire, F; Hamel, C; Defourny, P. Retrieving forest structure variables based on image texture analysis and IKONOS-2 imagery. Remote Sens. Environ 2006, 102, 390–401, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.02.022.
[18]
Giambelluca, TW; Nullet, MA; Schroeder, TA. Rainfall Atlas of Hawaii. Report R76; Department of Land and Natural Resources: Honolulu, HI, USA, 1986; p. 267.
[19]
Vrabel, JC. Multispectral imagery advanced band sharpening study. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens 2000, 66, 73–79.
[20]
Vrabel, JC; Doraiswamy, P; McMurtrey, JE. Demonstration of the accuracy of improved-resolution hyperspectral imagery. Proc. SPIE 2002, 4725, 556–567.
[21]
Abdi, H. O’Brien Test for homogeneity of variance. In Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics; Salkind, N, Ed.; SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2007.
[22]
Bruzzone, L; Roli, F; Serpico, SB. An extension of the Jeffreys-Matusita distance to multiclass cases for feature selection. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens 1995, 33, 1318–1321, doi:10.1109/36.477187.
[23]
Jensen, JR. Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2000.
[24]
Liu, XH; Skidmore, AK; Oosten, VH. Integration of classification methods for improvement of land-cover map accuracy. ISPRS J. Photogram. Remote Sens 2002, 56, 257–268, doi:10.1016/S0924-2716(02)00061-8.
[25]
Martinez Morales, R; Idol, T; Chen, Q. Differentiation of Acacia koa forest stands across an elevation gradient in Hawai‘i using fine resolution remotely sensed imagery. Int J Remote Sens 2011. accepted.
[26]
Holdridge, LR. Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data. Science 1947, 105, 367–368, doi:10.1126/science.105.2727.367. 17800882
[27]
Tosi, JA; Watson, V; Bolanos, R. Life Zone Maps: Hawai‘i, Guam, American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands, Palau, and the Federated States of Micronesia. Joint 119; Venture of Tropical Science Center, San Jose, Costa Rica and the Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry; USDA Forest Service: Hilo, HI, USA, 2002.
[28]
Roberts, DA; Green, RO; Adams, JB. Temporal and spatial patterns in vegetation and atmospheric properties from AVIRIS. Remote Sens. Environ 1997, 62, 223–240, doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00092-8.
[29]
Asner, GP. Biophysical and biochemical sources of variability in canopy reflectance. Remote Sens. Environ 1998, 64, 234–253, doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00014-5.
[30]
Shi, X; Brewbaker, JL. Genetic improvement of Hawai‘i’s premier hardwood, Acacia koaForest Genetic Resources No 31. Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2004; pp. 36–40.
