REDD+ is a potentially significant financial mechanism for shifting the incentives from deforestation and land use change to forest conservation and sustainability. Even though REDD+ is not primarily a governance reform, it will affect or be affected by forest governance, it can improve forest governance or be undermined by its failures and, therefore, it depends on good forest governance if it is to be efficient, effective and equitable. This article provides an overview of key issues in forest governance in Latin America and discusses the risk and opportunities for REDD+. Though progress has been made in some areas, there is still much to be done, and REDD+ could reinforce or be undermined by problematic governance tendencies that affect its effectiveness, ability to decrease carbon emissions, and/or its legitimacy. The article recommends priority investments in institutional capacity, inter-institutional negotiation mechanisms, citizen participation and safeguards for forest-based populations.
References
[1]
Court, J.; Hyden, G.; Mease, K. Governance Performance: The Aggregate Picture; World Governance Survey Discussion Paper 3; United Nations University: Tokyo, Japan, 2002. Available online: www.odi.org.uk/resources/download/3132.pdf (accessed on 9 August 2010).
[2]
ECOSOC (UN Economic and Social Council). Definition of basic concepts and terminologies in governance and public administration. In Note by the Secretariat, Committee of Experts on Public Administration, New York, NY, USA, 5th Session, New York, NY, USA, 27-31 March 2006, E/C.16/2006/4; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2006.
[3]
Sustaining Forests: A World Bank Strategy; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2002. Available online: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTABOUTUS/Resources/gss-biodiversityreading3-forest-strategy-booklet.pdf (accessed on 28 July 2010).
[4]
A Decade of Measuring the Quality of Governance: Governance Matters 2006; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2006. Available online: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/PSGLP/Resources/ADecadeofmeasuringthequalityofgovernance.pdf (accessed on 9 August 2010).
[5]
Bell, S. Economic Governance and Institutional Dynamics; Oxford University Press: Melbourne, Australia, 2002.
[6]
Cotula, L.; Mayers, M. Tenure in REDD: Start-Point or Afterthought?; International Institute for Environment and Development: London, UK, 2009.
[7]
Huitema, D.; Mostert, E.; Egas, W.; Moellenkamp, S.; Pahl-Wostl, C.; Yalcin, R. Adaptive water governance: Assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-)management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecol. Soc. 2009, 14, p. 26. Available online: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art26/ (accessed on 29 November 2010).
[8]
Oyono, P.R.; Ribot, J.C.; Larson, A.M. Green and Black Gold in Rural Cameroon: Natural Resources for Local Governance, Justice and Sustainability; Working Paper #22; World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
[9]
Sandbrook, C.; Nelson, F.; Adams, W.A.; Agrawal, A. Carbon, forests and the REDD paradox. Oryx？2010, 44, 330–334.
[10]
Saunders, J.; Reeve, R. Monitoring Governance for Implementation of REDD+. Background paper one for Monitoring Governance Safeguards in REDD+ Expert workshop, London, UK, 24–25 May 2010; Chatham House: London, UK, 2010.
[11]
Tacconi, L. Decentralization, forest and livelihoods: Theory and narrative. Glob. Environ. Change？2007, 12, 338–348.
[12]
Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2006.
[13]
Magrin, G.; Gay García, C.; Cruz Choque, D.; Giménez, J.C.; Moreno, A.R.; Nagy, G.J.; Nobre, C.; Villamizar, A. Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 581–615. Available online: http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/ch13s13-3-2.html (accessed on 30 April 2010).
[14]
State of Forestry in the Latin American and Caribbean Region; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2004.
[15]
CEPAL; FAO; IICA. The Outlook for Agriculture and Rural Development in the Americas: A Perspective on Latin America and the Caribbean; IICA: San Jose, Costa Rica, 2009.
[16]
Pacheco, P.; Aguilar-St？en, M.; Borner, J.; Etter, A.; Putzel, L.; Vera Diaz, M.D.C. Landscape transformation in tropical Latin America: Assessing trends and policy implications towards REDD+. Forests？2011, 2, 1–29.
[17]
Quijandría, B.; Monares, A.; Ugarte, R. Assessment of Rural Poverty: Latin America and the Caribbean; IFAD: Santiago de Chile, Chile, 2001.
[18]
Sunderlin, W.D.; Angelsen, A.; Belcher, B.; Burgers, P.; Nasi, R.; Santoso, L.; Wunder, S. Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: An overview. World Dev.？2005, 33, 1383–1402.
[19]
Ayres, E. Mapping the nature of diversity: A landmark project reveals a remarkable correspondence between indigenous land use and the survival of natural areas. World Watch, March–April 2003. Available online: http://www.nativelands.org/PUBLICATIONS/Pub/MappingDIVERSITY.pdf (accessed on 4 January 2011).
[20]
Red Amazónica de Información Socioambiental Georeferenciada (RAISG), Available online: http://raisg.socioambiental.org/node/106 (accessed on 10 July 2010).
[21]
Hall, G.; Patrinos, H.A. Indigenous Peoples, Poverty and Human Development in Latin America: 1994–2004; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
[22]
FAOSTAT. 2010. Available online: http://faostat.fao.org (accessed on 4 January 2011).
[23]
Lopez-Feldman, A.; Mora, J.; Taylor, J.E. Does natural resource extraction mitigate poverty and inequality? Evidence from rural Mexico and a Lacandona rainforest community; Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, UCDARE Working Papers; University of California: Davis, CA, USA, 2006.
[24]
International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO). Status of Tropical Forest Management 2005; ITTO Technical Series no. 24; ITTO: Yokohama, Japan, 2006.
[25]
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). El subsector pecuario en Centroamerica, Division de Estudios Generales, Departamento de Desarrollo Económico y Social; IDB: Managua, Nicaragua, 1977.
[26]
Clay, J.W. Indigenous People and Tropical Forests: Models of Land Use And Management from Latin America. Report 27; Cultural Survival: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1988.
[27]
Barry, D.; Larson, A.M.; Colfer, C.J.P. Forest tenure reform: An orphan with only uncles. In Forests for People: Community Rights and Forest Tenure Reform; Larson, A.M., Barry, D., Dahal, G.R., Colfer, C.J.P., Eds.; Earthscan: London, UK, 2010; pp. 19–42.
[28]
Ankersen, T.; Ruppert, T. Tierra y libertad, the social function doctrine and land reform in Latin America. Tulane Environ. Law J.？2006, 19, 69–120.
[29]
van Cott, D.L. The Friendly Liquidation of the Past: The Politics of Diversity in Latin America; University of Pittsburgh Press: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2000.
[30]
World Bank. World Development Report; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1997.
[31]
Boscolo, M.; van Dijk, K.; Savenije, H. Financing sustainable small-scale forestry: Issues and lessons from national forest financing strategies. Forests？2010, 1, 230–249.
[32]
Cronkleton, P.; Bray, D.; Medina, G. Community forest management and REDD development: Lessons from Mexico, Bolivia and Brazil. Presented at the Oaxaca Workshop on Forest Governance, Decentralization and REDD+ in Latin America and the Caribbean, A Country-Led Initiative in Support to UNFF by the Governments of Mexico and Switzerland, Oaxaca, 31 August–3 September 2010.
[33]
Hecht, S. Soybeans, development and conservation on the Amazon frontier. Dev. Change？2005, 36, 375–404.
[34]
Schoneveld, G. Potential Land Use Competition from First-Generation Biofuel Expansion in Developing Countries (Occasional Paper); CIFOR: Bogor, Indonesia, 2011.
[35]
Fischer, G.; Hizsnyik, E.; Prieler, S.; Shah, M.; van Velthuizen, H. Biofuels and food security: Implications of an Accelerated Biofuels Production. Summary of the OFID Prepared by IIASA (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis); OFID Pamphlet Series; The OPEC Fund for International Development: Vienna, Austria, 2009.
[36]
Binswanger, H. Brazilian Policies That Encourage Deforestation; Working Paper No. 16; Environment Department, World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 1989.
[37]
Hecht, S. Environment, development and politics: Capital accumulation and the livestock sector in eastern Amazonia. World Dev.？1985, 13, 663–684.
[38]
Public Policies and the Misuse of Forest Resources; Repetto, R., Gillis, M., Eds.; A World Resources Institute Book; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1988.
[39]
Skutsch, M.; Masera, O.; Gao, Y. Policies that Moderate the Impacts of Biofuels on Deforestation; Draft; CIFOR and UNAM: Bogor, Indonesia, 2010.
[40]
Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S.; Angelsen, A. Global and national REDD+ architecture: Linking institutions and actions. In Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options; Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Kanninen, M., Sills, E., Sunderlin, W.D., Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., Eds.; Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR): Bogor, Indonesia, 2009; pp. 13–24.
[41]
Mitchell, C. New studies of political decentralization in Latin America. Latin Am. Res. Rev.？2006, 41, 175–184.
[42]
Larson, A.M.; Pacheco, P.; Toni, F.; Vallejo, M. Trends in Latin American forestry decentralisations: Legal frameworks, municipal governments and forest-dependent groups. Int. Forest. Rev.？2007, 9, 734–747.
[43]
Toni, F. Decentralisation and REDD+ in Brazil. Forests？2011, 2, 66–85.
[44]
Rayner, S. How to eat an elephant: A bottom-up approach to climate policy. Climate Policy？2010, 10, 615–621.
[45]
Cerbu, G.A.; Swallow, B.M.; Thompson, D.Y. Locating REDD: A global survey and analysis of REDD readiness and demonstration activities. Environ. Sci. Policy？2010. in press.
[46]
Agrawal, A.; Nelson, F.; Adams, W.M.; Sandbrook, C. Governance and REDD: A reply to Wunder. Oryx？2010, 44, 335–338.
[47]
Wunder, S. Forest decentralization for REDD? A response to Sandbrook et al. Oryx？2010, 44, 335–338.
[48]
Conyers, D. Decentralization: The latest fashion in development administration? Public Administ. Dev.？1983, 3, 97–109.
[49]
Larson, A.M. Formal decentralization and the imperative of decentralization ‘from below’: A case study of natural resource management in Nicaragua. In Democratic Decentralization through a Natural Resource Lens; Ribot, J.C., Larson, A.M., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2005.
[50]
Corbera, E.; Estrada, M.; May, P.; Navarro, G.; Pacheco, P. Rights to forests and carbon: Insights from Mexico, Brazil and Costa Rica. Presented at the Oaxaca Workshop on Forest Governance, Decentralization and REDD+ in Latin America and the Caribbean, A Country-Led Initiative in Support to UNFF by the Governments of Mexico and Switzerland, Oaxaca, 31 August–3 September 2010.
[51]
Barragán, L. Documento base preliminar del foro electrónico: pueblos indígenas y áreas protegidas en América Latina. Progress Report; Food and Agriculture Organization and Organismo Autónomo Parques Nacionales de Espana: Santiago, Chile, January 2007. Available online: http://www.rlc.fao.org/es/tecnica/parques/pdf/DocBaseP.pdf (accessed on 1 July 2010).
[52]
van Dam, C. Indigenous territories and REDD in Latin America: Opportunity or threat? Presentation at the Oaxaca Workshop on Forest Governance, Decentralization and REDD+ in Latin America and the Caribbean, A Country-Led Initiative in Support to UNFF by the Governments of Mexico and Switzerland, Oaxaca, 31 August–3 September 2010.
[53]
Tropical Forest Tenure Assessment: Trends, Challenges and Opportunities; 2009.
[54]
Larson, A.M.; Barry, D.; Cronkleton, P.; Pacheco, P. Tenure Rights and Beyond: Community Access to Forest Resources in Latin America; CIFOR Occasional Paper 50; CIFOR: Bogor, Indonesia, 2008.
[55]
Forests for People: Community Rights and Forest Tenure Reform; Larson, A.M., Barry, D., Dahal, G.R., Colfer, C.J.P., Eds.; Earthscan: London, UK, 2010.
[56]
Larson, A.M.; Mendoza-Lewis, J. Desafíos en la Tenencia Comunitaria de Bosques en la Región Autónoma Atlántico Norte (RAAN) de Nicaragua; CIFOR/URACCAN: Managua, Nicaragua, 2009.
[57]
Monterroso, I.; Barry, D. Tenencia de la tierra, bosques y medios de vida en la reserva de la biosfera Maya en Guatemala: Sistema de concesiones forestales comunitarias; CIFOR/FLACSO Editorial de Ciencias Sociales: Guatemala, 2009.
[58]
Cronkleton, P.; Pacheco, P.; Ibarguen, R.; Albornoz, M. Reformas en la tenencia de la tierra y los bosques: La gestión communal en las tierras bajas de Bolivia; CIFOR and CEDLA: La Paz, Bolivia, 2009.
[59]
Pacheco, P.; Nunes, W.; Rocha, C.; Vieira, I.; Herrera, J.; Alves, K.; Feitosa, T.; Cayres, G. Acesso à terra e meios de vida: examinando suas intera？？es em três locais no Estado do Pará; CIFOR,LAET/NEAF/UFPA/ARCA: Santa Cruz, Bolivia, 2008.
[60]
Cotula, L.; Dyer, N.; Vermeulen, S. Fuelling Exclusion? The Biofuels Boom and Poor People's Access to Land; International Institute for Education and Development: London, UK, 2008.
[61]
Food and Agricultural Organization of the UN (FAO) National Forestry Monitoring and Assessment; FAO: Rome, Italy. Available online: http://www.fao.org/forestry/nfma/47655/en/ (accessed on 15 August 2010).
[62]
Quiroga, R.; Maluenda, J.; Castano, J. Mejoran las estadísticas forestales en Latinoamérica. OIMT Actual. Forest. Trop.？2003, 11, 13–15.
[63]
Navarro, G.; Del Gatto, F.; Faurby, O.; Arguello, A. Verificación de la Legalidad en el Sector Forestal Nicaraguense, VI Congreso Forestal Centroamericano ‘Competitividad, Sostenibilidad Forestal en Centroamérica’, San Salvador, El Salvador, 29–31 August; 2007.
[64]
Carvalheiro, K.; Sabogal, C.; Amaral, P. Análise da legisla？？o para o manejo florestal por pequenos produtores na Amaz？nia Brasileira; Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR): Belem, Pará, Brazil, 2008.
[65]
Silva, E.; Kaimowitz., D.; Bojanic, A.; Ekoko, F.; Manurung, T.; Pavez, I. Making the law of the jungle: The reform of forest legislation in Bolivia, Cameroon, Costa Rica, and Indonesia. Glob. Environ. Polit.？2002, 2, 63–97.
[66]
Larson, A.M.; Ribot, J. The poverty of forest policy: Double standards on an uneven playing field. Sustain. Sci.？2007, 2, 189–204.
[67]
Kolstad, I.; Soreide, T. Corruption in natural resource management: Implications for policy makers. Res. Policy？2009, 34, 214–226.
[68]
Contreras-Hermosilla, A. People, governance and forests: The stumbling blocks in forest governance reform. Presented at the Oaxaca Workshop on Forest Governance, Decentralization and REDD+ in Latin America and the Caribbean, A Country-Led Initiative in Support to UNFF by the Governments of Mexico and Switzerland, Oaxaca, 31 August–3 September 2010.
[69]
Elías, E. Autogestión comunitaria de recursos naturales. El caso de Totonicapán; FLACSO: Guatemala, 2007.
[70]
Elías, S.; Larson, A.; Mendoza, J. Tenencia de la tierra, Bosques y Medios de Vida en el Altiplano Occidental de Guatemala; CIFOR/FAUSAC: Guatemala, Guatemala, 2009.
[71]
Strengthening Forest Law Enforcement and Governance—Addressing a Systemic Constraint to Sustainable Development; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
[72]
Kaufmann, D. Misrule of Law: Does the Evidence Challenge Conventions in Judiciary and Legal Reforms? World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2001. Available online: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWBIGOVANTCOR/Resources/misruleoflaw.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2010).
[73]
World Resources Report. The Wealth of the Poor: Managing Ecosystems to Fight Poverty; World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
[74]
Kaufmann, D.; Kraay, A.; Mastruzzi, M. Governance Matters VIII: Governance Indicators for 1996–2008; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
[75]
Brown, D.; Schreckenberg, K.; Bird, N.; Cerutti, P.; Del Gatto, F.; Diaw, C.; Fomete, T.; Luttrell, C.; Navarro, G.; Oberndorf, R. Legal Timber: Verification and Governance in the Forest Sector; Overseas Development Institute: London, UK, 2008.
[76]
Using Drivers of Change to Improve Aid Effectiveness; DFiD Practice paper; Department for International Development (DFID): London, UK, 2005.
[77]
Crooke, B.; Kothari, U. Participation: The New Tyranny; Zed Books Ltd.: New York, NY, USA, 2004.
[78]
Durban Group for Climate Justice. No REDD! No REDD Plus. Global Sign-On Campaign against Schemes for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation; Durban Group for Climate Justice: Durban, South Africa, 13 April 2010. Available online: http://www.durbanclimatejustice.org (accessed on 10 September 2010).
[79]
Environmental Justice in Latin America: Problems, Promise, and Practice; Carruthers, D., Ed.; Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2008.
[80]
Saule, N.; Velasco, A.M.; Arashiro, Z. Legal Frameworks for Citizen Participation: Latin America Regional Report; LogoLink: University of Sussex: Brighton, UK, 2002. Available online: http://www.ids.ac.uk/logolink/resources/legalframeregional.htm (accessed on 15 August 2010).
[81]
Mendel, T. The Right to Information in Latin America: A Comparative Legal Survey; United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Quito, Ecuador, 2009. Available online: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001832/183273e.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2010).
[82]
Access Initiative. Situation of Access to Environmental Information, participation and justice in Latin America, 2004-2005; Iniciativa de Acceso Mexico y Corporación Participa: Mexico and Chile, 2005. Available online: http://www.accessinitiative.org (accessed on 10 June 2010).
[83]
Avritzer, L. Democracy and the Public Space in Latin America; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2002.
[84]
Cuellar, N.; Kandel, S.; Davis, A.; Elizondo, D. El proceso de preparacion para REDD+ en Mesoamerica; PRISMA: San Salvador and Grupo Cabal: Managua, Nicaragua, 2010.
[85]
Brandon, K.; Wells, M. Lessons for REDD+ from protected areas and integrated conservation and development projects. In Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options; Angelsen, A., Ed.; CIFOR: Bogor, Indonesia, 2009; pp. 225–236.
