Cigarette butts are consistently the most collected items in litter clean-up efforts, which are a costly burden to local economies. In addition, tobacco waste may be detrimental to our natural environment. The tobacco industry has conducted or funded numerous studies on smokers’ littering knowledge and behavior, however, non-industry sponsored research is rare. We sought to examine whether demographics and smokers’ knowledge and beliefs toward cigarette waste as litter predicts littering behavior. Smokers aged 18 and older (n = 1,000) were interviewed about their knowledge and beliefs towards cigarette waste as litter. Respondents were members of the Research Now panel, an online panel of over three million respondents in the United States. Multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to determine factors significantly predictive of ever having littered cigarette butts or having littered cigarette butts within the past month ( p-value < 0.05). The majority (74.1%) of smokers reported having littered cigarette butts at least once in their life, by disposing of them on the ground or throwing them out of a car window. Over half (55.7%) reported disposing of cigarette butts on the ground, in a sewer/gutter, or down a drain in the past month. Those who did not consider cigarette butts to be litter were over three and half times as likely to report having ever littered cigarette butts (OR = 3.68, 95%CI = 2.04, 6.66) and four times as likely to have littered cigarette butts in the past month (OR = 4.00, 95%CI = 2.53, 6.32). Males were significantly more likely to have littered cigarette butts in the past month compared to females (OR = 1.49, 95%CI = 1.14, 1.94). Holding the belief that cigarette butts are not litter was the only belief in this study that predicted ever or past-month littering of cigarette waste. Messages in anti-cigarette-litter campaigns should emphasize that cigarette butts are not just litter but are toxic waste and are harmful when disposed of improperly.
References
[1]
Mokdad, A.H.; Marks, J.S.; Stroup, D.F.; Gerberding, J.L. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2004, 291, 1238–1245, doi:10.1001/jama.291.10.1238.
[2]
Danaei, G.; Ding, E.L.; Mozaffarian, D.; Taylor, B.; Rehm, J.; Murray, C.J.; Ezzati, M. The preventable causes of death in the United States: Comparative risk assessment of dietary, lifestyle, and metabolic risk factors. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, 1–21.
[3]
Keep America Beautiful. National Visible Litter Survey and Litter Cost Study; Keep America Beautiful: Stamford, CT, USA, 2009.
[4]
Ocean Conservancy. Tracking Trash: 25 Years of Action for the Ocean; Ocean Conservancy: Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
[5]
Schneider, J.E.; Peterson, N.A.; Kiss, N.; Ebeid, O.; Doyle, A.S. Tobacco litter costs and public policy: A framework and methodology for considering the use of fees to offset abatement costs. Tob. Control 2011, 20(Suppl 1), i36–i41. 10093191
[6]
Luke, J.A. Degradability of Filter Materials and Plastics Packaging; Bates No. 401341580-401341583. 1991. Available online: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/rvj95a99 (accessed on 22 December 2011).
[7]
Haynes, S.; Stricler, D.V.; Wilson, S.A. Study of the Environment Degradation of Cigarette Filters: A Stimulation of the Roadside or Parking Lot Environment. Eastman Chemical; Bates No. 2053814736/4740. 1999. Available online: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/oro93a00 (accessed on 13 May 2012).
[8]
Puls, J.; Wilson, S.A.; H？lter, D. Degradation of cellulose acetate-based materials: A review. J. Polym. Environ. 2011, 19, 152–165, doi:10.1007/s10924-010-0258-0.
[9]
Novotny, T.E.; Lum, K.; Smith, E.; Wang, V.; Barnes, R. Cigarettes butts and the case for an environmental policy on hazardous cigarette waste. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2009, 6, 1691–1705, doi:10.3390/ijerph6051691.
[10]
Hon, N.-S. Photodegradation of cellulose acetate fibers. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 1977, 15, 725–744, doi:10.1002/pol.1977.170150319.
[11]
Ishigaki, T.; Sugano, W.; Nakanishi, A.; Tateda, M.; Ike, M.; Fujita, M. The degradability of biodegradable plastics in aerobic and anaerobic waste landfill model reactors. Chemosphere 2004, 54, 225–233, doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00750-1.
[12]
Smith, E.A.; Novotny, T.E. Whose butt is it? Tobacco industry research about smokers and cigarette butt waste. Tob. Control 2011, 20(Suppl 1), i2–i9. 10093191
[13]
Judge Rules against Big Tobacco—Sides with Government in Multibillion-Dollar Racketeering Case, But Companies Don’t Have to Pay for Cessation Campaigns. 2006. Available online: http://money.cnn.com/2006/08/17/news/companies/tobacco_ruling/index.htm (accessed on 29 May 2012).
[14]
Slaughter, E.; Gersberg, R.M.; Watanabe, K.; Rudolph, J.; Novotny, T.E. Toxicity of cigarette butts, and their chemical components, to marine and freshwater fish. Tob. Control 2011, 20(Suppl 1), i25–i29. 10093191
[15]
Moerman, J.W.; Potts, G.E. Analysis of metals leached from smoked cigarette litter. Tob. Control 2011, 20(Suppl 1), i30–i35, doi:10.1136/tc.2010.040196.
[16]
Micevska, T.; Warne, M.S.J.; Pablo, F.; Patra, R. Variation in, and causes of, toxicity of cigarette butts to a cladoceran and microtox. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2006, 50, 205–212, doi:10.1007/s00244-004-0132-y. 16328625
[17]
Tobacco Institute. A Second Proposal for Industry “Litter” Policy; Bates No. TI08971985/1991. 1985. Available online: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/nuz30c00 (accessed on 22 December 2011).
[18]
Keep America Beautiful. What We Do. Available online: http://www.kab.org/site/PageServer?pagename=whatwedo (accessed on 11 May 2012).
[19]
Smith, E.; McDaniel, P. Covering their butts: Responses to the cigarette litter problem. Tob. Control 2011, 20, 100–106, doi:10.1136/tc.2010.036491.
[20]
Keep Britain Tidy. Cigarette Litter. 2010. Available online: http://www.keepbritaintidy.org/Campaigns/pastcampaigns/cigarette/Default.aspx (accessed on 11 May 2012).
[21]
Campbell, F. People Who Litter; ENCAMS: Wigan, UK, 2007.
[22]
Tobacco Manufacturers’ Association: Representing the UK Tobacco Sector. Policy & Legislation: Litter. Available online: http://www.the-tma.org.uk/policy-legislation/litter/ (accessed on 11 May 2012).
[23]
Keep Britain Tidy. How Are We Funded? Available online: http://www.keepbritaintidy.org/AboutUs/HowWeOperate/Funding/Default.aspx (accessed on May 2012).
[24]
Tobacco Manufacturers’ Association: Representing the UK Tobacco Sector. About Us. Available online: http://www.the-tma.org.uk/about/ (accessed on 11 May 2012).
[25]
Johnson, J. Littering Drops Sharply, According to KAB Report; Waste & Recycling News. , 2009.
[26]
Keep America Beautiful. Litter Prevention. Available online: http://www.kab.org/site/PageServer?pagename=Focus_litter_prevention (accessed on 7 December 2011).
[27]
Chapman, S. Butt clean up campaigns: Wolves in sheep's clothing? Tob. Control 2006, 15.
[28]
Keep America Beautiful. Littering Behavior in America: Results of a National Study; Keep America Beautiful: San Marcos, CA, USA, 2009.
[29]
PR News. Nonprofit PR Awards. Available online: http://www.prnewsonline.com/nonprofitPRawards2012/ (accessed on 2 April 2012).
[30]
MarCom Awards. Legacy. Available online: http://www.marcomawards.com/search-gold-2011.php (accessed on 2 April 2012).
[31]
Hermes Creative Awards. 2012. Available online: http://www.hermesawards.com/winners-browse/2012/1 (accessed on 8 May 2012).
[32]
National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS). In 2009 Questionnaire; CDC: Atlanta, GA, USA, 1-8.
[33]
DRAFT 2011 National Health Interview Survey Questionnaire—Sample Adult Adult Identification; CDC: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2011.
[34]
Stata Statistical Software for Professionals, version 11.2, Available online: www.stata.com (accessed on 6 June 2012).
[35]
Schultz, P.W.; Bator, R.J.; Large, L.B.; Bruni, C.M.; Tabanico, J.J. Littering in context: Personal and environmental predictors of littering behavior. Environ. Behav. 2011.
[36]
Iowa Department of Transportation. Iowa Department of Transportation 2001 Litter Survey Results; Iowa Department of Transportation: Des Moines, IA, USA, 2002.
[37]
Texas Department of Transportation. 2009 Litter Attitudes and Behaviors Study. 2009. Available online: http://dontmesswithtexas.org/research/ (accessed on 6 June 2012).
[38]
Tidy Britain Group. Attitudes Towards Cigarette Disposal Outdoors; Bates No. 2065184690/4727. 1996. Available online: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/gkq47d00 (accessed on 22 December 2011).
[39]
Callaham, P. Summary of Environmental Qualitative Research; Bates No. 2051565214/5222. 1995. Available online: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/aur06c00 (accessed on 22 December 2011).
[40]
Campbell, F. No Butts: Smoking-Related Litter; ENCAMS: Wigan, UK, 2008.
[41]
Stallworth-Hooper, C. Philip Morris Litter Communication Program; Bates No. 2081337051/7078. 1998. Available online: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/fyr14a00 (accessed on 22 December 2011).
[42]
Washington State Department of Ecology. Washington State Litter Study; Washington State Department of Ecology: Olympia, WA, USA, 1999.
[43]
Cigarette Butt Pollution Project. Available online: http://www.cigwaste.org/ (accessed on 29 May 2012).
[44]
Cigarette Butt Pollution Project. The Environmental Impact of Cigarette Butt Waste: Just the Facts. Available online: http://www.cigwaste.org/images/stories/cbpp%20just%20the%20facts.pdf (accessed on 29 May 2012).
[45]
Greenfield Consulting Group. The Cigarette Butt Litter Issue—Exploratory Research; Bates No. 2063517624/7646. 1997. Available online: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/mbj05c00 (accessed on 22 December 2011).
[46]
TobaccoFreeCa. Thrown Away; 2011. Available online: http://www.tobaccofreeca.org/ads/tv/ (accessed on 6 June 2012).
