Making the National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA) More Responsive to the Livelihood Needs of Tree Planting Farmers, Drawing on Previous Experience in Dryland Sudan
Recently, tree planting has become popular under NAPA. For decades, many tree planting projects were implemented to reduce the vulnerability of ecosystems and societies. Despite all of these, tree-dependent livelihoods remain vulnerable, which leaves doubt on the benefit of tree planting to enhance the resilience of livelihoods to climatic shocks. This suggests that much can be learned from the past to improve future tree planting adaptation projects. This paper draws on the experience of farmers involved in gum arabic agroforestry in Sudan in order to understand the needs of tree-related adaptation projects that should be addressed. Surveyed farmers appreciated the different environmental services rendered by trees. Their priority areas for an adaptation project however, remain issues tied to gum producer price, rainfall pattern, and locust attacks as well as extension services and to a lesser extent access to micro credits. Moreover, Sudan’s Gum Arabic Company (GAC) and Forests National Corporation play key roles in governance but are not yet considered as key adaptation players particularly the unsupportive role of the monopoly of gum exportation by GAC to tree planting as an adaptation activity. By focusing the design and implementation on tree related livelihood obstacles, adaptation projects are likely to be more responsive to the needs of vulnerable groups.
References
[1]
Verchot, L.V.; van Noordwijk, M.; Kandji, S.; Tomich, T.P.; Ong, C.K.; Albrecht, A.; Mackensen, J.; Bantilan, C.; Anupama, K.V.; Palm, C. Climate change: Linking adaptation and mitigation through agroforestry. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2007, 12, 901–918.
[2]
Locatelli, B.; Kanninen, M.; Brockhaus, M.; Colfer, C.J.P.; Murdiyarso, D.; Santoso, H. Facing Uncertain Future: How Forests and People can Adapt to Climate Change. Forest Perspectives No. 5; Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR): Bogor, Indonesia, 2008.
[3]
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The Least Developed Countries National Adaptation Programmes of Action: Overview of Preparation, Design of Implementation Strategies and Submission of Revised Project Lists and Profiles. LDC Expert Group 2009; UNFCCC: Bonn, Germany, 2009.
[4]
Osman-Elasha, B.; Downing, T. Lessons Learned in Preparing National Adaptation Programmes of Action in Eastern and Southern Africa. Policy Analysis Report; European Capacity Building Initiative (ECBI): Oxford, UK, 2007.
[5]
Hardee, K.; Mutunga, C. Strengthening the link between climate change adaptation and national development plans: Lessons from the case of population in National Adaptation Programmes of Actions (NAPAs). Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2009, 15, 113–126.
[6]
Kalame, F.B. Modified taungya system in the transition zone of Ghana. In Forests and Climate Change: Adaptation and Mitigation; Bodegom, V., Jan, A., Savenije, H., Wit, M., Eds.; Tropenbos International: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 101–106.
[7]
HCENR. National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA); Higher Council for Environment and Natural Resource, Ministry of Environment and Physical Development: Khartoum, Republic of Sudan, 2007.
[8]
The Cancun Agreement: Outcome of the Work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action Under the Convention (Decision 1/CP.16); UNFCCC: Cancun, Mexico, 2011. Available online: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/cop16/eng/07a01.pdf#page=2 (accessed on 15 September 2011).
[9]
Fl？m, K.H.; Skj？rseth, J.B. Does adequate financing exist for adaptation in developing countries? Clim. Policy 2009, 9, 109–114.
[10]
McGuire, S.J.; Sperling, L. Leveraging farmers' strategies for coping with stress: Seed aid in Ethiopia. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2008, 18, 679–688.
[11]
Weber, F.R.; Stoney, C. Reforestation in Arid Lands, 2nd ed. ed.; Volunteers in Technical Assistance (VITA): Arlington, VA, USA, 1986.
[12]
World Bank. Export Marketing of Gum Arabic from Sudan. Policy Note; Multi Donor Trust Fund-National, Technical Secretariat: Khartoum, Sudan; Juba, Sudan, 2007.
[13]
Ballal, M.E.; El Siddig, E.A.; Elfadle, M.A.; Luukkanen, O. Gum arabic yield in differently managed Acacia senegal stands in Western Sudan. Agrofor. Forum 2005, 63, 237–245.
[14]
Rahim, A.H.; van Ierland, E.C.; Wesseler, J. Economic incentives for abandoning or expanding gum Arabic production in Sudan. For. Policy Econ. 2007, 10, 36–47.
[15]
Ibrahim, A.M. Twenty eight years (1979-2007) of forestry cooperation between Finland and Sudan: A case study. In Research Collaboration on Responsible Natural Resources Management, the 1st UniPID Workshop; Hares, M., Luukkanen, O., Eds.; University of Helsinki; pp. 51–54.
[16]
IPCC. Climate Change 2007, Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007.
[17]
Adger, W.N.; Arnell, N.W.; Tompkins, E.L. Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2005, 15, 77–86.
[18]
Hedger, M.; Mitchell, T.; Leavy, J.; Greeley, M.; Downie, A.; Horrocks, A. Evaluation of Adaptation to Climate Change from a Development Perspective; Institute of Development Studies: Brighton, UK, 2008.
[19]
Adger, W.N.; Huq, S.; Brown, K.; Conway, D.; Hulme, M. Adaptation to climate change in the developing world. Prog. Dev. Stud. 2003, 3, 179–195.
[20]
Thomas, D.S.G.; Twyman, C. Equity and justice in climate change adaptation amongst natural-resource-dependent societies. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2005, 15, 115–124.
[21]
Environmental Protection Agency. Strategic Environmental Assessment of the Ghana Poverty Reduction Strategy Report; EPA: Accra, Ghana, 2004.
[22]
Carlsson, L.; Berkes, F. Co-management: Concepts and methodological implications. J. Environ. Manag. 2005, 75, 65–76.
[23]
Plummer, R.; Armitage, D. A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive comanagement: Linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 61, 62–74.
[24]
Eriksen, S.; N？ss, L.O. Pro-Poor Climate Adaptation: Norwegian Development Cooperation and Climate Change Adaptation: An Assessment of Issues, Strategies and Potential Entry Points. CICERO Report 2003:2; Report prepared for the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD): Oslo, Norway, 2003.
Gaafar, M. Improving Traditional Acacia Senegal Agroforestry: Ecophysiological Characterisrtics as Indicators for Tree-Crop Interaction in Western Sudan. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Helsniki, Helsniki, Finland, 2005.
[27]
Keddeman, W. Restocking of the Gum Belt for Desertification Control in Kordofan, Phase III. Report of the evaluation mission (UNSO/SUD/89/X05); Netherlands Economic Institute, Agricultural and Rural Development Department: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1994.
[28]
Warren, A.; Khogali, M. Asssessment of Desertification and Drought in the Sudano-Sahelian Region 1985–1991; UNSO: New York, NY, USA, 1992.
[29]
Olsson, L. On the causes of famine—Drought, desertification and market failure in the Sudan. Ambio 1993, 22, 395–403.
[30]
Elmqvist, B.; Olsson, L. Livelihood diversification: Continuity and change in the Sahel. GeoJournal 2006, 67, 167–180.
Tarig, E.M. Vulnerability of Gum Arabic Producing Farmers; Director of Gum Arabic Research Center, University of Kordofan: El Obeid, North Kurdufan, Sudan. Personal communication, 2010.
[33]
El Obeid and Kosti Stations; Sudan Meteorological Authority: Khartoum, Sudan, 2010.
[34]
Gum Arabic Production; Bank of Sudan: Khartoum, Sudan, 2007.
