One of the main issues regarding the implementation of REDD+ in Latin America has been the growing concern that such projects may infringe upon the rights and negatively affect the livelihoods of forest-dependent communities. Various indigenous and civil society organizations are ardently opposed to the initiative. Such is the case in Ecuador, where indigenous opposition to REDD+ represents a considerable obstacle in the creation of a national strategy since more than 60% of the country’s remaining forest cover is on indigenous land or under indigenous occupation. Thus one of the most critical challenges remaining for Ecuador will be the construction of a strong legal, financial, and institutional framework—one that the greater indigenous community might be willing to accept. Closer examination of this topic however, reveals just how difficult this may become. Lack of information, a recent political split between national authorities and the indigenous sector, and the dissimilar organizational capacity levels of indigenous communities make the feasibility of carrying out REDD+ projects on these lands extremely complex. However, the biggest obstacle may be ideological. Many indigenous groups view REDD+, with its possible emphasis on international markets and neoliberal mechanisms, as a continuation of the type of policies that have impeded their quest for sovereignty and self determination. As such, indigenous people are only willing to consider such projects if they clearly see preconditions in place that would safeguard their cultures, territories, and autonomy.
References
[1]
United Nations. REDD Programme. Available online: http://www.un-redd.org/AboutREDD/tabid/582/Default.aspx (accessed on 6 January 2011).
[2]
Podvin, K. Socio-Bosque Program, Quito, Ecuador. Personal communication 2010.
[3]
Fundacion Pachamama, Quito, Ecuador. In Personal communication; 2010.
[4]
FCAE (Federacion de Centros Awa del Ecuador), Ibarra, Ecuador. In Personal communication; 2010.
[5]
Fundacion Accion Ecologica, Quito, Ecuador. In Personal communication; 2010.
[6]
Confederacion de Nacionalidades Indigenas del Ecuador (CONAIE). Available online: http://www.conaie.org/component/content/article/2-notis2/328--los-grupos-de-pueblos-indigenas-anuncian-serias-preocupaciones-por-el-posible-resultado-de-cancun (accessed on 10 January 2011).
[7]
Palacios, W. Potencial etnobotánico de los territorios indígenas en el Ecuador. Revista Bosques Latitud Cero. 2005, 2, 19–25.
[8]
Phelps, J.; Guerrero, M.C.; Dalabajan, D.A.; Young, B.; Webb, E.L. What makes a ‘REDD+’ country? Global Environ. Change 2010, 20, 322–332.
[9]
Barragan, L. CEPLAES, Quito, Ecuador. In Personal communication; 2010.
[10]
Griffiths, T. Seeing ‘REDD+’ Forests, Climate Change Mitigation and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. Updated Report; Forests and Peoples Programme: London, UK, 2009; p. 63.
[11]
Tauli-Corpuz, V.; UNPFII. Statement on the Announcement of the World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility; United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues: Bali, Indonesia, 2007.
[12]
REDD Monitor. Available online: http://www.redd-monitor.org/2010/09/30/evo-morales-nature-forests-and-indigenous-peoples-are-not-for-sale/ (accessed on 6 October 2010).
[13]
Sawyer, Suzana. Crude Chronicles; Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA, 2004.
[14]
NAWE (Nacionalidad Waorani del Ecuador), Puyo, Ecuador. In Personal communication; 2010.
[15]
NAWE (Nacionalidad Waorani del Ecuador), Puyo, Ecuador. In Personal communication; 2010.
[16]
Borman, R. FEINCE (Federacion Indigena de la Nacionalidad Cofan del Ecuador) Quito, Ecuador. In Personal communication; 2010.
[17]
Plan Nacional para el Buen Vivir 2009–2013. SENPLADES 2009. Available online: http://plan.senplades.gov.ec/ (accessed on 16 June 2010).
Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador. Available online: http://www.ambiente.gob.ec/sites/default/files/users/mponce/tasadedeforestacion.pdf (accessed on 20 April 2010).
[20]
Sistema Integrado de Indicadores Sociales del Ecuador (SIISE 4.5), 2001. Available online: http://www.siise.gov.ec/ (accessed on 15 May 2010).
[21]
Banco Central del Ecuador: Evolucion de la Economia Ecuatoriana, Julio 2010. Available online: http://www.bce.fin.ec/ (accessed on 16 August 2010).
[22]
Lascano, M. Valoración de la Contribución Forestal a la Economía Nacional: Caso de Ecuador. In Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization and FAO Forestry Commission Report; ACTO: Puyo, Ecuador, 2008.
[23]
Parker, C.; Mitchell, A.; Trivedi, M.; Mardas, N. The Little REDD+ Book: A Guide to Governmental and Non-Governmental Proposals for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation; Global Canopy Project: Oxford, UK, 2008.
[24]
FAO. State of the World's Forests; Food and Drug Administration: Rome, Italy, 2007.
[25]
Steward, R.; Gibson, D. Environmental and economic development consequences of forest and agricultural sector policies in Latin America: A synthesis of case studies of Costa Rica, Ecuador and Bolivia. In Readings of the Workshop on Government Policy Reform for Forestry Conservation and Development in Latin America; Washington, DC, USA, 1994.
[26]
World Resource Institute. Available online: http://earthtrends.wri.org/pdf_library/country_profiles/bio_cou_218.pdf (accessed on 17 July 2010).
[27]
Ministerio del Ambiente, Quito, Ecuador. In Personal communication; 2010.
[28]
Indigenous Peoples, Poverty and Human Development in Latin America 1994–2004; Hall, G., Patrinos, H., Eds.; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
[29]
Becker, M. Indians and Leftists in the Making of Ecuador's Modern Indigenous Movements.; Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA, 2008.
[30]
Becker, M. Pachakutik and Indigenous Political Party Politics in Ecuador. In Latin American Social Movements in the Twenty-First Century: Resistance, Power, and Democracy; Stahler-Sholk, R., Vanden, H.E., Kuecker, G., Eds.; Rowman and Littlefield: Lanham, MD, USA, 2008; pp. 165–180.
[31]
van Cott, D. Broadening Democracy: Latin America's indigenous peoples movements. Curr. Hist. 2004, 103, 80–85.
[32]
Li, T. Articulating indigenous identity in Indonesia: Resource politics and the tribal slot. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 2000, 42, 149–179.
[33]
Perreault, T. Developing identities: indigenous mobilization, rural livelihoods, and resource access in Ecuadorian Amazonia. ECUMENE, Sage Publications 2001, 8, 381–413.
[34]
Dosh, P. Correa vs Social Movements: Showdown in Ecuador. NACLA Report on the Americas; North American Congress on Latin America: New York, NY, USA, 2009; Volume 42, pp. 21–40.
[35]
Gudynas, E. La Ecologia politica del giro biocentrico en la nueva Constitutcion del Ecuador. Revista de estudios sociales 2007, 32, 34–46.
[36]
The News Library. Speech by Rafael Correa: 26 July 2008. Available online: http://rafael-correa-news.newslib.com/2009053123 (accessed on 30 May 2010).
[37]
Constitucion de la Republica del Ecuador. Available online: http://www.asambleanacional.gov.ec/documentos/constitucion_de_bolsillo.pdf (accessed on 3 March 2010).
[38]
President, indigenous groups at odds over fatal protest in Ecuador (2 October 2009). Available online: http://edition.cnn.com/2009 (accessed on 30 May 2010).
[39]
Knoke, T.; Calvas, B.; Aguirre, N.; Roman-Cuesta, R.M.; Gunter, S.; Stimm, B.; Weber, M.; Mosandl, R. Can tropical farmers reconcile subsistence needs with forest conservation? Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7, 548–554.
[40]
Indigenous Environmental Network. Available online: http://www.ienearth.org/carbontrading1.html (accessed on 18 July 2010).
[41]
Cotula, L.; Mayers, J. Tenure in REDD—Start-Point or Afterthought?. Natural Resource Issues No. 15; International Institute for Environment and Development: London, UK, 2009.
[42]
Czebiniak, R.P.; Breitkopf, S. Greenpeace letter of concern to K. Sierra, Vice-President of Sustainable Development at the World Bank; 2007.
[43]
Sunderlin, W.D.; Angelsen, A.; Roberts, T. Rights: An essential precondition for effectiveness, efficiency and equity in REDD+. Presentation at Forest Day: Shaping the Global Agenda for Forests and Climate Change, Ponzan, Poland; 2008.
[44]
Phelps, J.; Webb, E.L.; Agrawal, A. Does REDD++ threaten to recentralize forest governance? Science 2010, 328, 312–313.
[45]
Dove, M.R. A revisionist view of tropical deforestation and development. Environ. Conserv. 1993, 20, 17.
[46]
Hirtz, F. It takes modern means to be traditional: On recognizing indigenous cultural communities in the Philippines. Develop. Change 2003, 34, 887–914.
[47]
Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador. Available online: http://www.ambiente.gob.ec/?q=node/57 (accessed on 23 May 2010).
[48]
Conservation International. Available online: http://www.conservation.org/FMG/Articles/Pages/grand_plan_ecuador_and_forest_partners.aspx (accessed 17 May 2010).
[49]
FCAE (Federacion de Centros Awa del Ecuador), Ibarra, Ecuador. In Personal communication; 2010.
[50]
Tena, Ecuador. In Personal communication; 2010.
[51]
Pimpert, M.P.; Pretty, J.N. Parks, People and Professionals: Putting “Participation” into Protected Area Management; United Nations Research Institutute for Social Development: Geneva, Switzerland, 1995.
[52]
Heller, J. Catch-22: A Novel; Simon & Schuster Classics: New York, NY, USA, 1999.
[53]
Becker, M. Grassroots to grassroots: why forest preservation was rapid at Loma Alta, Ecuador. World Dev. 2003, 31, 163.
[54]
Kaimowitz, D. The prospects for Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) in Mesoamerica. Int. For. Rev. 2008, 10, 485–495.
[55]
Ascher, W. Communities and Sustainable Forestry in Developing Countries; Institute for Contemporary Studies(ICS): San Francisco, CA, USA, 1995.
[56]
Peluso, N.L. Whose woods are these? Counter-mapping forest territories in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Antipode 1995, 27, 383–406.
[57]
United States Agency for International Development.. Used with permission from USAID Available online: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADK832.pdf (accessed 30 March 2011).
Brown, D.; Seymour, F.; Peskett, L. How do we achieve REDD+ co-benefits and avoid doing harm? In Moving ahead with REDD+: Issues, Options and Implications; Angelsen, A., Ed.; CIFOR: Bogor, Indonesia, 2008; pp. 107–118.
