The Water Framework Directive (WFD) is an ambitious piece of legislation designed to protect and improve water quality throughout Europe. However, forests are only mentioned once in the WFD, and forestry is not mentioned at all, despite its potential implications for streams, rivers and lakes. Here we present a transdisciplinary commentary on the WFD and its implications for forests and forestry in Sweden. This commentary has been prepared by forestry stakeholders, biophysical and social scientists. While we were cognizant of a large body of discipline-specific research, there are very few inter- or trans-disciplinary commentaries which link academic and stakeholder perspectives on the WFD. We had originally felt that there would be little commonality in our concerns. However, we found significant areas of agreement. Our key areas of concern about the implications of the WFD for forestry in Sweden included: (i) concerns about what is meant by good ecological status and how it is assessed; (ii) a perceived lack of clarity in the legal framework; (iii) an inadequate environmental impact assessment process; and (iv) uncertainties about appropriate programs of measures for improving water quality. We were also concerned that ecosystem services provided by forests and the positive effects of forestry on water quality are inadequately recognized in the WFD.
References
[1]
Laudon, H.; Sponseller, R.; Lucas, R.W.; Futter, M.N.; Egnell, G.; Bishop, K.; ?gren, A.; Ring, E.; H?gberg, P. Consequences of more intensive forestry for the sustainable management of forest soils and waters. Forests?2011. (in press).
[2]
Bassett, A. Aquatic science and the water framework directive: A still open challenge towards ecogovernance of aquatic ecosystems. Aquat. Conservat. Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst.?2010, 20, 245–249.
[3]
Stoddard, J.L.; Larsen, D.P.; Hawkins, C.P.; Johnson, R.K.; Norris, R.H. Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: The reference condition approach. Ecol. Appl.?2006, 16, 1267–1276.
[4]
Hering, D.; Borja, A.; Carstensen, J.; Carvalho, L.; Elliott, M.; Feld, C.K.; Heiskanen, A.S.; Johnson, R.K.; Moe, J.; Pont, D.; Solheim, A.L.; De Bund, W. The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: A critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. Sci. Total Environ.?2010, 408, 4007–4019.
[5]
N?ges, P.; Van der Bund, W.; Cardoso, A.C.; Solimini, A.G.; Heiskanen, A.-S. Assessment of the ecological status of European surface waters: A work in progress. Hydrobiologia?2009, 633, 197–211.
[6]
Moss, B. The water framework directive: Total environment or political compromise? Sci. Total Environ.?2008, 400, 31–42.
[7]
Hedelin, B. Potential implications of the EU Water Framework Directive in Sweden. Europ. J. Spat. Dev.?2005, 14, 1–17.
[8]
Hedelin, B.; Lindh, M. Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive—Prospects for sustainable water planning in Sweden. Europ. Environ.?2008, 18, 327–344.
[9]
Schlyter, P.; Stjernquist, I. Regulatory challenges and forest governance in Sweden. In Environmental Politics and Deliberative Democracy; B?ckstrand, K., Khan, J., Kronsell, A., L?vbrand, E., Eds.; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2010; pp. 180–196.
[10]
Keskitalo, E.C.H.; Pettersson, M. Implementing multi-level governance? The effects of the EU Water Framework Directive on forestry in Sweden. Environ. Manage.. (unpublished work)?
[11]
Sandin, L. Testing the EC Water Framework Directive “one-out, all out” rule—Simulating different levels of assessment errors along a pollution gradient in Swedish streams. Verhandlungen der Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie?2005, 29, 334–336.
[12]
L?fgren, S.; Kahlert, M.; Johansson, M.; Bergrengren, J. Classification of two Swedish forest streams in accordance with the European Union Water Framework Directive. Ambio?2009, 38, 394–400.
[13]
Vernersson, L. Lantbrukets Aff?rstidning; ATL: Malm?, Sweden, 5 July 2009. Available online: http://www.atl.nu/debatt/ledare.jsp (accessed on 10 December 2010).
[14]
Molinga, P.P. Towards the transdisciplinary engineer: Incorporating ecology, equity and democracy concerns into water professionals' attitudes, skills and knowledge. Irrigat. Drain.?2009, 58, S195–S204.
[15]
Steyaert, P.; Ollivier, G. The European water framework directive: How ecological assumptions frame technical and social change. Ecol. Soc.?2007, 12, 25:1–25:16.
[16]
Sigel, K.; Klauer, B.; Pahl-Wostl, C. Conceptualising uncertainty in environmental decision-making: The example of the Ecological EU water framework directive. Ecol. Econ.?2010, 69, 502–510.
[17]
Darnhofer, I.; Loibl, M.C. Experiences from Transdisciplinary Workshops: Co-learning about the Effects of Global Change on Farming and Rural Areas; XXIInd ESRS Congress Waginegen: Waginegen, NL, USA, 2007.
[18]
Bergmann, M.; Bromann, B.; Hofmann, E.; Loibl, M.C.; Rehaag, R.; Schram, E.; Vo?, J.-P. Quality Criteria of Transdisciplinarity Research; English version; ISOE-Studientexte No. 13; Institute for Social-Ecological Research: Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 2005; p. 76.
[19]
Blackstock, K.L.; Carter, C.E. Operationalising sustainability science for a sustainability directive? Reflecting on three pilot projects. Geograph. J.?2007, 173, 343–357.
[20]
Burkhardt-Holm, P. Fischnetz: Involving anglers, authorities, scientists and the chemical industry to understand declining fish yields. In The Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research; Hadorn, G.H., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., Zemp, E., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2008; pp. 127–143.
[21]
Hagberg, L. Participation under administrative rationality: Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive in Forestry. In Environmental Politics and Deliberative Democracy; B?ckstrand, K., Khan, J., Kronsell, A., L?vbrand, E., Eds.; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2010; pp. 123–142.
[22]
Bratt, A. Municipal officers on implementing the EU water framework directive in Sweden regarding agricultural nutrient flows. Local Environ.?2004, 9, 65–79.
[23]
Keskitalo, E.C.H. Personal Communication; Ume? University: Ume?, Sweden, 2010.
[24]
Hysing, E. Governing without government? The private governance of forest certification in Sweden. Public Admin.?2009, 87, 312–326.
[25]
Bishop, K.; Beven, K.; Destouni, G.; Abrahamsson, K.; Andersson, L.; Johnson, R.K.; Rodhe, J.; Hjerdt, N. Nature as the “Natural” goal for water management: A conversation. Ambio?2009, 38, 209–214.
[26]
L?fgren, S. Personal Communication; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Uppsala, Sweden, 2010.
[27]
Hatton-Ellis, T. The hitchhiker's guide to the Water Framework Directive. Aquat. Conservat. Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst.?2008, 18, 111–116.
[28]
Skogsbruk med h?nsyn till vatten; Skogforsk: Uppsala, Sweden, 2008; p. 64.
[29]
10 Years of the Water Framework Directive: A Toothless Tiger? A Snapshot Assessment of EU Environmental Ambitions; European Environmental Bureau: Brussels, Belgium, 2010; p. 16.
[30]
Neary, D.G.; Ice, G.G.; Jackson, C.R. Linkages between forest soils and water quality and quantity. Forest Ecol. Manag.?2009, 258, 2269–2281.
[31]
Andréassian, V. Waters and forests: From historical controversy to scientific debate. J. Hydrol.?2004, 291, 1–27.
[32]
Ellison, D.L.; Futter, M.N.; Bishop, K. Forest-Water Interactions: A reply to the water yield debate. Global Change Biol.. (submitted for publication)?
[33]
Futter, M.N.; Ring, E.; H?gbom, L.; Entenmann, S.; Bishop, K. Consequences of nitrate leaching following conventional harvesting of Swedish forests are dependent on spatial scale. Environ. Pollut.?2010, 158, 3552–3559.
[34]
Eckerberg, K. Implementation of environmental protection in Swedish forestry: A policy perspective. Forest Ecol. Manag.?1986, 17, 61–72.
[35]
Ecke, F.; Hellsten, S.; Mjelde, M.; Kuoppala, M.; Schlacke, S. Potential conflicts between environmental legislation and conservation exemplified by aquatic macrophytes. Hydrobiologia?2010, 656, 107–115.
[36]
The Swedish Forestry Act 1994; Skogsstyrelsen: Stockholm, Sweden, 1994.
[37]
Barreira, A. Water governance at the European Union. J. Contemp. Water Res.Edu.?2006, 135, 80–85.
[38]
Lundqvist, L. Integrating Swedish water resource management: A multi-level governance trilemma. Local Environ.?2004, 9, 413–424.
[39]
Water Framework Directive—WFD Implementation in a European Perspective KSLA Tidskrift 8; KSLA: Stockholm, Sweden, 2006; p. 40.
[40]
Rault, P.A.K.; Jeffrey, P.J. Deconstructing public participation in the Water Framework Directive: implementation and compliance with the letter or with the spirit of the law? Water Environ. J.?2008, 22, 241–259.
[41]
Buffam, I.; Laudon, H.; Seibert, J.; M?rth, C.-M.; Bishop, K. Spatial heterogeneity of the spring flood acid pulse in a boreal stream network. Sci. Total Environ.?2008, 407, 708–722.
[42]
Swedish FSC Standard for Forest Certification; Forest Stewardship Council: Powys, UK, 2009; p. 84.
[43]
Revised Swedish Technical Document II; PEFC: Paris, France, 2006; p. 43.
[44]
Buttle, J.M. Rethinking the donut: The case for environmentally relevant buffer zones. Hydrol. Proc.?2002, 16, 3093–3096.