In this review paper, we assess the economical, governance, and technical conditions that shape forest management in tropical Latin America with particular regard to efforts to reduce forest-based carbon emissions. We provide a framework for discussions about ways to improve forest management that achieve environmental objectives while promoting local and national development and contributing to local livelihoods. We argue that many management practices that lead towards sustainability are only likely to be adopted where there is good governance backed by financial incentives for effective enforcement of management regulations. We propose some policy interventions designed to lower net greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing rates of forest degradation and increasing carbon stock recovery in logged-over or otherwise degraded forests. Implementation of REDD+ could provide critical compensation to forest users for improved management practices in the absence of, or in combination with other economic？incentives.
References
[1]
Gibbs, H.K; Ruesch, A.S.; Achard, F.; Clayton, M.K.; Holmgren, P.; Ramankutty, N.; Foley, J.A. Tropical forest were the primary sources of new agricultural lands in the 1980s and 1990s. PNAS？2010, 107, 16732–16737.
Asner, G.P.; Broadbent, E.N.; Oliveira, P.J.C.; Keller, M.; Knapp, D.E.; Silva, J.N.M. Conditions and fate of logged forests in the Brazilian Amazon. Science？2006, 103, 12947–12950.
[7]
Status of Tropical Forest Management 2005; ITTO Technical Series no. 24; ITTO: Yokohama, Japan, 2006.
[8]
Putz, F.E.; Dykstra, D.P.; Heinrich, R. Why poor logging practices persist in the tropics. Conserv. Biol.？2000, 14, 951–956.
[9]
Applegate, G.; Putz, F.E.; Snook, L.K. Who Pays For and Who Benefits from Improved Timber Harvesting Practices in the Tropics: Lessons Learned and Information Gaps; CIFOR: Bogor, Indonesia, 2004.
[10]
Nasi, R.; Frost, P.G.H. Sustainable forest management in the tropics: Is everything in order but the patient still dying? Ecol. Soc. 2009, 14, p. 40. Available online: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art40/ (accessed on 25 January 2011).
[11]
Lentini, M.; Pereira, D.; Celentano, D.; Pereira, R. Fatos Florestais da Amaz？nia 2005; Belem: Imazon, Brazil, 2005.
[12]
Keller, M.; Asner, G.P.; Blate, G.; Mc Glocklin, J.; Merry, F.; Pena-Claros, M.; Zweede, J. Timber production in selectively logged tropical forests in South America. Front Ecol. Environ.？2007, I, 213–216.
[13]
FSC 2009. Global FSC Certificates: Types and Distribution; Forest Stewardship Council: Bonn, Germany, June 2009. Available online: http://www.fsc.org (accessed on 10 January 2010).
[14]
Rice, R.E.; Gullison, R.E.; Reid, J.W. Can sustainable management save tropical forests? Sci. Am.？1997, 276, 44–49.
[15]
Pearce, D.; Putz, F.E.; Vanclay, J. Sustainable forestry: Panacea or folly? Forest Ecol. Manag.？2002, 172, 229–247.
[16]
Rudel, T.K.; Coomes, O.T.; Moran, E.; Achard, F.; Angelsen, A.; Xu, J.; Lambin, E. Forest transitions: Towards a global understanding of land use change. Glob. Environ. Chang.？2005, 15, 23–31.
[17]
Ghazoul, J.; Butler, R.A.; Mateo-Vega, J.; Koh, L.P. REDD: A reckoning of environment and development implications. Trends Ecol. Evol.？2010, 25, 396–402.
[18]
Illegal Logging: Law Enforcement, Livelihoods and the Timber Trade; Tacconi, L., Ed.; Earthscan: London, UK, 2007.
[19]
Chomitz, K. At Loggerheads? Agricultural Expansion, Poverty Reduction, and Environment in the Tropical Forests; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
Margulis, S. Causes of Deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Report No. 22, 107; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
[22]
Walker, R.; Browder, J.; Arima, E.; Simmons, C.; Pereira, R.; Caldas, M.; Shirota, R.; Zen, S.D. Ranching and the new global range: Amazonia in the 21st century. Geoforum？2009, 40, 732–745.
[23]
Morton, D.C.; De Fries, R.S.; Shimabukuro, Y.E.; Anderson, L.O.; Arai, E.; Del Bon Espirito-Santo, F.; Freitas, R.; Morisette, J. Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon. PNAS？2006, 103, 14637–14641.
[24]
Nepstad, D.; Stickler, C.; Almeida, O. Globalization of the Amazon soy and beef industries: Opportunities for conservation. Conserv. Biol.？2006, 20, 1595–1603.
[25]
De Jong, W.; Borner, J.; Pacheco, P.; Pokorny, B.; Sabogal, C. The Amazon Forests at the Crossroads: Pressures, responses and challenges. In Forests and Society—Responding to Global Drivers of Change; Mery, G., Katila, P., Galloway, G., Alfaro, R.I., Kanninen, M., Lobovikov, M., Varjo, J., Eds.; IUFRO: Vienna, Austria, 2010; Volume 25, p. 509.
[26]
Holmes, T.P.; Blate, G.M.; Zweede, J.C.; Pereira, R., Jr.; Barreto, P.; Boltz, F.; Barch, R. Financial and ecological indicators of RIL logging performance in the eastern Amazon. Forest Ecol. Manag.？2002, 163, 93–110.
[27]
Healey, J.R.; Price, C.; Tay, J. The cost of carbon retention by reduced impact logging. Forest Ecol. Manag.？2000, 139, 237–255.
[28]
Putz, F.E.; Sist, P.; Fredericksen, T.S.; Dykstra, D. Reduced-impact logging: Challenges and opportunities. Forest Ecol. Manag.？2008, 256, 1427–1433.
[29]
Bulkan, J.; Newsom, D.; May, P.; Stoian, D.; Fonseca, S.A.; Campos, J.J.; Gambetta, F.C.; Cancino, J.M.; Pinelo, G.; Quevedo, L. Latin America: Regional overview. In Confronting Sustainability: Forest Certification in Developing and Transitioning Countries; Cashore, B., Gale, F., Meidinger, E., Newsom, D., Eds.; Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies: New Haven, CT, USA, 2006.
[30]
Bray, D.; Barton, D.; Merino-Pérez, L.; Barry, D. The Community Forests of Mexico: Managing for Sustainable Landscapes; University of Texas Press: Austin, TX, USA, 2005.
[31]
Monterroso, I.; Barry, D. Institutional change and community forestry in the Mayan Biosphere Reserve Guatemala. Proceedings of the 12th Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Commons, Cheltenham, UK, 14–18 July 2008.
[32]
Barry, D.; Taylor, P.L. An Ear to the Ground: Tenure Changes and Challenges for Forest Communities in Latin America; Rights and Resources Initiative: Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
[33]
Martínez, A.; Colín, S. La Certificación Ambiental de los Bosques en México: Reporte Preliminar. Gaceta Ecol.？2003, 65, 45–60.
[34]
Anta, S. Forest certification in México. In Confronting Sustainability: Forest Certification in Developing and Transitioning Countries; Cashore, B., Gale, F., Meidinger, E., Newsom, D., Eds.; Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies: New Haven, CT, USA, 2004; pp. 407–434.
[35]
De Lima, A.C.B.; Keppe, A.L.N.; Alves, M.C.; Maule, R.F.; Sparovek, G. Impact of FSC Forest Certification on Agroextractive Communities of the State of Acre, Brazil; Imaflora, University of Sao Paulo, Entropix Engineering Co.: S？o Paulo, Brazil, 2008; p. 126.
[36]
Becker, M.; Laaksonen-Craig, S. Barriers to forest certification in developing countries. Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics Uppsala, Sweden, 8–11 May 2006; L？nnstedt, L., Rosenquist, B., Eds.; Scandinavian Forest Economics: Uppsala, Switzerland, 2006; pp. 23–42.
[37]
De Graaf, N.R. Reduced impact logging as part of the domestication of neotropical rainforest. Int. Forest. Rev.？2000, 21, 40–44.
[38]
Richards, M.; Moura Costa, P. Can tropical forestry be made more profitable by internalising the externalities? Natur. Resour. Perspect.？1999, 46, 1–6.
[39]
Larson, A.M.; Cronkleton, P.; Barry, D.; Pacheco, P. Tenure Rights and Beyond: Community Access to Forest Resources in Latin America; CIFOR: Bogor, India, 2008.
[40]
Pacheco, P.; Barry, D.; Cronkleton, P.; Larson, A. The Role of Informal Institutions in the Use of Forest Resources in Latin America; CIFOR: Bogor, India, 2008.
[41]
Pacheco, P.; De Jong, W.; Johnson, J. The evolution of the timber sector in lowland Bolivia: Examining the influence of three disparate policy approaches. Forest Policy Econ.？2010, 12, 271–276.
[42]
Smith, J.; Colan, V.; Sabogal, C.; Snook, L. Why policy reforms fail to improve logging practices: The role of governance and norms in Peru. Forest Policy Econ.？2006, 8, 458–469.
[43]
SFB/IMAZON. A atividade madeireira na Amaz？nia brasileira: Produ？？o, receita e mercados; Servi？o Florestal Brasileiro & Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amaz？nia: Belem, Brazil, 2010.
[44]
RAISG. Red Amazonica de Información Socioambiental Georeferenciada. SFB/IMAZON; A atividade madeireira na Amaz？nia brasileira: Produ？？o, receita e mercados; Servi？o Florestal Brasileiro & Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amaz？nia: Belem, Brazil, 2009.
[45]
Lima, E.; Merry, F.; Nepstad, D.; Amacher, G.; Azevedo-Ramos, C; Lefebvre, P; Resque, F., Jr. Searching for sustainability: Forest policies, smallholders, and the Trans-Amazon highway. Environment？2006, 48, 26–37.
[46]
Cronkleton, P.; Pacheco, P.; Ibargüen, R.; Albornoz, M.A. Reformas en la tenencia forestal en Bolivia: La gestión comunal en las tierras bajas; CIFOR, CEDLA, RRI: La Paz, Bolivia, 2009.
[47]
Merino, L. Informe Final del Proyecto: Estudio de Línea de Base de PROCYMAF II. Documento Borrador; Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Fondo Sectorial CONAFOR-CONACYT: Zapopan, México, 2007.
[48]
Benneker, C. Dealing with the State, the Market and NGOs: The Impact of Institutions on the Constitution and Performance of Community Forest Enterprises (CFE) in the Lowlands of Bolivia; Wageningen University: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2008.
[49]
Carvalheiro, K. Análise da legisla？？o para o manejo florestal por pequenos produtores na Amaz？nia Brasileira; Projeto FORLIVE: Belem, Brazil, 2008.
[50]
Tramitología: Un fuerte obstáculo para el sector forestal de México. Red de Monitoreo de Políticas Públicas, Nota Informativa NúMERO19; Consejo Civil Mexicano para la Silvicultura Sostenible (CCMSS): México City, México, 2008.
[51]
Anta, S.; Carabias (Compiladores), J. Consecuencias de las políticas públicas en el uso de los ecosistemas y la biodiversidad. In Capital Natural de México. Libro III. Políticas Públicas y Perspectivas de Sustentabilidad.; Comisión Nacional de Biodiversidad: Delegación Tlalpan, México, 2006; pp. 86–153.
[52]
Souza, C.M.; Pereira, K.; Lins, V.; Haiashy, S. Web-oriented GIS system for monitoring, conservation and law enforcement of the Brazilian Amazon. Earth Sci. Inform.？2009, 2, 205–215.
[53]
Durst, P.B.; McKenszie, P.J.; Brown, C.L.; Appanah, S. Challenges facing certification and eco-labelling of forest products in developing countries. Int. Forest. Rev.？2006, 8, 193–200.
[54]
Pokorny, B.; Sabogal, C.; Silva, J.N.M.; Bernardo, P.; Souza, J.; Zweede, J. Compliance with reduced-impact harvesting guidelines by timber enterprises in terra firme forests of the Brazilian Amazon. Int. Forest. Rev.？2005, 7, 9–20.
[55]
Sabogal, C.; Pokorny, B.; Silva, N.; Bernardo, P.; Massih, F.; Boscolo, M.; Lentini, M.; Sobral, L.; Veríssimo, A. Manejo florestal empresarial na Amaz？nia Brasileira. In Restri？？es e oportunidades para a ado？？o de boas práticas de manejo. Final Report; CIFOR/EMBRAPA: Belém, Brazil, 2005.
[56]
Dykstra, D.; Elias. RIL Becomes Real in Brazil. Tropical Forest Update 13/4; ITTO: Yokohama, Japan, 2003.
[57]
Putz, F.; Nasi, R. Carbon benefits from avoiding and repairing forest degradation. In Realising REDD: National Strategies and Policy Options; Angelsen, A., Ed.; CIFOR: Bogor, Indonesia, 2009.
[58]
Schulze, M.; Lentini, M.; Zweede, J.C. Training needs for RIL and improved forest management. In Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options; Angelsen, A., Ed.; CIFOR: Bogor, Indonesia, 2009; p. 257.
[59]
Lentini, M.; Schulze, M.; Zweede, J. Os desafios ao sistema de concessoes de florestas publicas na Amazonia; Ciencia Hoje: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. in press.
[60]
Sist, P.; Bertault, J.-G. Reduced impact logging experiments: Impact of harvesting intensities and logging techniques on stand damage. In Silvicultural Research in a Lowland Mixed Dipterocarp Forest of East Kalimantan; Bertault, J.-G., Kadir, K., Eds.; CIRAD-Forêt: Montpellier, France, 1998; pp. 139–161.
[61]
Grogan, J.; Schulze, M. Estimating the number of trees and forest area necessary to supply internationally traded volumes of big-leaf mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla) in Amazonia. Environ. Conserv.？2008, 35, 26–35.
[62]
Richards, M. Can sustainable tropical forestry be made profitable? The potentials and limitations of innovative incentive mechanisms. World Dev.？2000, 28, 1001–1016.
[63]
Ebeling, J.; Yasué, M. The effectiveness of market-based conservation in the tropics: Forest certification in Ecuador and Bolivia. J. Environ. Manag.？2009, 90, 1145–1153.
[64]
Chen, J.; Innes, J.L.; Tikina, A. Private cost-benefits of voluntary forest product certification. Int. Forest. Rev.？2010, 12, 1–12.
[65]
Van Kuijk, M.; Putz, F.E.; Zagt, R. Effects of Forest Certification on Biodiversity; TROPENBOS International: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2009.
[66]
Zagt, R.; Sheil, D.; Putz, F.E. Biodiversity Conservation in Certified Forests: An Overview; Sheil, D., Putz, F.E., Zagt, R., Eds.; Tropenbos International: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. V–XXVIII.
[67]
FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2006.
[68]
Letcher, S.G.; Chazdon, R.L. Rapid recovery of biomass, species richness, and species composition in a forest chronosequence in northeastern Costa Rica. Biotropica？2009, 41, 608–617.
Villegas, Z.; Pe？a-Claros, M.; Mostacedo, B.; Alarcón, A.; Licona, J.C.; Lea？o, J.C.; Pariona, W.; Choque, U. Silvicultural treatments enhance growth rates of future crop trees in a tropical dry forest. Forest Ecol. Manag.？2009, 258, 971–977.
[71]
Forests for People: Community Rights and Forest Tenure Reform; Larson, A., Barry, D., Dahal, D., Eds.; Earthscan: London, UK, 2010.
[72]
Chhatre, A.; Agrawal, A. Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. PNAS？2009, 106, 17667–17670.
[73]
Karsenty, A.; Drigo, I.G.; Piketty, M-G.; Singer, B. Regulating industrial forest concession in Central Africa and South America. Forest Ecol. Manag.？2008, 256, 1498–1508.
[74]
Merry, F.D.; Amacher, G.S.; Pokorny, B.; Lima, E.; Scholz, I.; Nepstad, D.C.; Zweede, J.C. Some doubts about concession in Brazil. Int. Trop. Timber Org. Trop. Forest Update？2003, 13, 7–9.
[75]
Kaimowitz, D. Forest law enforcement and rural livelihoods. Int. Forest. Rev.？2003, 5, 199–210.
[76]
Honey-Rosés, J. Illegal logging in common property forests. Soc. Natur. Res.？2009, 22, 916–930.
[77]
Sist, P.; Ferreira, F.N. Sustainability of reduced-impact logging in the eastern Amazon. Forest Ecol. Manag.？2007, 243, 199–209.
[78]
Krueger, W. Effects of future crop tree flagging and skid trail planning on conventional diameter-limit logging in a Bolivian tropical forest. Forest Ecol. Manag.？2004, 188, 381–393.
[79]
Rockwell, C.A.; Kainer, K.A.; Staudhamme, C.L.; Baraloto, C. Future crop tree damage in a certified community forest in southwestern Amazonia. Forest Ecol. Manag.？2007, 242, 108–118.
[80]
Pe？a-Claros, M.; Peters, E.M.; Justiniano, M.J.; Bongers, F.; Blate, G.M.; Fredericksen, T.S.; Putz, F.E. Regeneration of commercial trees species following silvicultural treatments in a moist tropical forest. Forest Ecol. Manag.？2008, 255, 1283–1293.
[81]
Verwer, C.; Pe？a-Claros, M.; van der Staak, D.; Ohlson-Kiehn, K.; Sterck, F.J. Silviculture enhances the recovery of overexploited mahogany, Swietenia macrophylla. J. Appl. Ecol.？2008, 45, 1770–1779.
