Old-growth forest is an often-used term that seems to be intuitively understood by ecologists and forest managers, and the wide-ranging discussion of its social and ecological values suggests it has currency among the general public as well. However, a decades-long discourse regarding a generally acceptable definition of old-growth, in both conceptual and practical terms, has gone largely unresolved. This is partially because old-growth is simultaneously an ecological state, a value-laden social concept, and a polarizing political phenomenon, each facet of its identity influencing the others in complex ways. However, the public, scientific, and management discourse on old-growth has also suffered from simplifying tendencies which are at odds with old-growth’s inherently complex nature. Such complexity confounds simple or rationalistic management approaches, and the forest management arena has witnessed the collision of impassioned and contradictory opinions on the ‘right way’ to manage old-growth forests, ranging from strict preservationism to utilitarian indifference. What is clear is that management approaches that circumvent, trivialize, eliminate, or ignore old-growth’s inherent complexity may do so at the expense of the very characteristics from which old-growth derives its perceived value. We explore the paradoxes presented by the various approaches to old-growth description and definition and present some plausible paths forward for old-growth theory and management, with a particular focus on managed forests.
References
[1]
Perry, D.A. The scientific basis of forestry. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1998, 29, 435–466.
Christensen, N.L.; Bartuska, A.M.; Carpenter, S.; D'Antonio, C.; Francis, R.; Franklin, J.F.; MacMahon, J.A.; Noss, R.F.; Parsons, D.J.; Peterson, C.H.; Turner, M.G.; Woodmansee, R.G. The report of the ecological society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecol. Appl. 1996, 6, 665–691.
[4]
Creating a Forestry for the 21st Century: The Science of Ecosystem Management; Kohm, K.A., Franklin, J.F., Eds.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1997.
[5]
Seymour, R.S.; Hunter, M.L. Principles of ecological forestry. In Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems; Hunter, M.L., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1999; pp. 22–61.
[6]
Duinker, P.N.; Bull, G.Q.; Shindler, B.A. Sustainable forestry in Canada and the United States: developments and prospects. In Two Paths toward Sustainable Forests: Public Values in Canada and the United States; Shindler, B.A., Beckley, T.M., Finley, M.C., Eds.; Oregon State University Press: Corvallis, OR, USA, 2003; pp. 35–59.
[7]
Kimmins, J.P. Old-growth forest: an ancient and stable sylvan equilibrium, or a relatively transitory ecosystem condition that offer people a visual and emotion feast? Answer—it depends. For. Chron. 2003, 79, 429–440.
[8]
Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature; Cronon, W., Ed.; W.W. Norton & Co.: New York, NY, USA, 1995.
[9]
Reinventing Nature? Responses to Postmodern Deconstruction; Soulé, M., Lease, G., Eds.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1995.
[10]
Helms, J.A. Old-growth: what is it? J. For. 2004, 103, 8–12.
[11]
Duchesne, L. Defining Canada's old-growth forests—problems and solutions. For. Chron. 1994, 70, 739–744.
[12]
Mosseler, A.; Thompson, I.; Pendrel, B.A. Overview of old-growth forests in Canada from a science perspective. Environ. Rev. 2003, 11, S1–S7.
[13]
Frelich, L.E.; Reich, P.B. Perspectives on development of definitions and values related to old-growth forests. Environ. Rev. 2003, 11, S9–S22.
[14]
Hendrickson, O. Old-growth forests: data gaps and challenges. For. Chron. 2003, 79, 645–651.
[15]
Gordon, J.C. Revisiting the old-growth question. J. For. 2004, 103, 6–7.
[16]
Moeur, M.; Spies, T.A.; Hemstrom, M.; Martin, J.R.; Alegria, J.; Browning, J.; Cissel, J.; Cohen, W.B.; Demeo, T.E.; Healey, S.; Warbington, R. Northwest Forest Plan The First 10 Years (1994-2003): Status and Trend of Late-Successional and Old-Growth Forest. PNW-GTR-646; USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station: Portland, OR, USA, 2005.
[17]
Carey, A.B. Ecological foundations of biodiversity: lessons from natural and managed forests of the Pacific Northwest. Northwest Science 1998, 72, 127–133.
[18]
Rittel, H.; Webber, M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Science 1973, 4, 155–169.
[19]
Ludwig, D. The era of management is over. Ecosystems 2001, 4, 758–764.
[20]
Lee, R.G. Sacred trees. In Old Growth in a New World; Spies, T.A., Duncan, S.L., Eds.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2009; pp. 95–103.
[21]
Proctor, J. Old growth and a new nature: Ambivalence of science and religion; Spies, TA, Duncan, SL, Eds.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2009; pp. 104–115.
[22]
Moyer, J.M.; Owen, R.J.; Duinker, P.N. Forest values: A framework for old-growth forest with implications for other forest conditions. Open Forest Sci. J. 2008, 1, 27–36.
[23]
Bunnell, F.L.; Huggard, D.J. Biodiversity across spatial and temporal scales: problems and opportunities. For. Ecol. Manage. 1999, 115, 113–126.
[24]
Lund, H.G. When is a forest not a forest? J. For. 2001, 100, 21–28.
[25]
Hunter, M.L. What constitutes and old-growth stand? J. For. 1989, 87, 33–35.
[26]
Helms, J.A. The Dictionary of Forestry; Society of American Foresters: Bethesda, MD, USA, 1998.
[27]
Bormann, F.H.; Likens, G.E. Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 1979.
[28]
Oliver, C.D.; Larson, B.C. Forest Stand Dynamics; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA,, 1990.
[29]
Franklin, J.F.; Spies, T.A.; van Pelt, R.; Carey, A.B.; Thornburgh, D.A.; Berg, D.R.; Lindenmayer, D.B.; Harmon, M.E.; Keeton, W.S.; Shaw, D.C.; Bible, K.; Chen, J. Disturbance and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example. For. Ecol. Manage. 2002, 155, 399–423.
[30]
Burgman, M.A. Characterisation and declineation of the eucalypt old-growth forest estate in Australia: a review. For. Ecol. Manage. 1996, 83, 149–161.
[31]
Spies, T.A. Ecological concepts and diversity of old-growth forests. J. For. 2004, 103, 14–20.
[32]
Hunter, M.L.; White, A.S. Ecological thresholds and the definition of old-growth forests. Nat. Area J. 1997, 17, 292–296.
[33]
Spies, TA.; Turner, Franklin, JF. The diversity and maintenance of old-growth forests. In Biodiversity in Managed Landscapes: Theory and Practice; Szaro, R.C., Johnson, D.W., Eds.; Oxford: New York, NY, USA, 1996; pp. 296–314.
[34]
Spies, T.A.; Franklin, J.F. The structure of natural young, mature, and old-growth Douglas-fir forests in Oregon and Washington. In Wildlife and Vegetation of Unmanaged Douglas-Fir Forests; Ruggiero, L.F., Aubry, K.B., Aubry, K.B., Carey, A.B., Huff, M.H., Eds.; Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station: Portland, OR, USA, 1991; pp. 91–109.
DeLong, S.C.; Burton, P.J.; Harrison, M. Assessing the relative quality of old-growth forest: an example from the Robson Valley, British Columbia. Br. Columbia J. Ecosyst. Manag. 2004, 4. Available online: http://www.forrex.org/publications/jem/ISS24/vol4_no2_art8.pdf (accessed on 24 February 2011).
[37]
Franklin, J.F.; van Pelt, R. Spatial aspects of structural complexity in old-growth forests. J. For. 2004, 103, 22–28.
[38]
Ishii, H.T.; Tanabe, S.; Hiura, T. Exploring the relationships among canopy structure, stand productivity, and biodiversity of temperate forest ecosystems. Forest Sci. 2003, 50, 342–55.
[39]
Hunter, M.L. Biological diversity. In Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems; Hunter, M.L., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1999; pp. 3–21.
[40]
Tews, J.; Brose, U.; Grimm, V.; Tielb？rger, K.; Wichmann, M.C.; Schwager, M.; Jeltsch, F. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J. Biogeogr. 2004, 31, 79–92.
[41]
Noss, R.F. Assessing and monitoring forest biodiversity: a suggested framework and indicators. For. Ecol. Manage. 1999, 115, 135–146.
[42]
Lindenmayer, D.B.; Margules, C.R.; Botkin, D.B. Indicators of biodiversity in ecologically sustainable forest management. Conserv. Biol. 2000, 14, 941–950.
[43]
Leverett, R. Definitions and history. In Eastern Old-Growth Forests: Prospects for Rediscovery and Recovery; Davis, M.B., Ed.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1996; pp. 1–17.
[44]
Loo, J.; Ives, N. The Acadian forest: historical condition and human impacts. For. Chron. 2003, 79, 462–474.
[45]
Holling, C.S.; Gunderson, L.H.; Ludwig, D. In question of a theory of adaptive change. In Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems; Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S., Eds.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2002; pp. 3–22.
[46]
Pauly, D. Anecdotes and the shifting baselines syndrome of fisheries. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1995, 10, 430.
[47]
White, M.A.; Mladenoff, D.J. Old-growth landscape transitions from pre-European settlement to present. Landsc. Ecol. 1994, 9, 191–205.
[48]
Lorimer, C.G.; White, A.S. Scale and frequency of natural disturbances in the northeastern US: implications for early successional forest habitats and regional age distributions. For. Ecol. Manage. 2003, 185, 41–64.
[49]
Kolasa, J.; Rollo, C.D. The heterogeneity of heterogeneity: a glossary. In Ecological Heterogeneity; Kolasa, J., Pickett, S.T.A., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 1–23.
[50]
Rapp, V. New Findings about Old-Growth Forests. Science Update 4; USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station: Portland, OR, USA, 2003.
[51]
Zenner, E.K.; Hibbs, D.E. A new method for modeling the heterogeneity of forest structure. For. Ecol. Manage. 2000, 129, 75–87.
[52]
Mathys, L.; Ginzler, C.; Zimmerman, N.E.; Brassel, P.; Wildi, O. Sensitivity analysis on continuous landscape variables to classify a discrete forest area. For. Ecol. Manage. 2006, 229, 111–119.
[53]
Puettmann, K.J.; Coates, K.D.; Messier, C. A critique of silviculture: Managing for complexity; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
[54]
Carpenter, S.R. Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology. Ecology 1996, 77, 677–680.
[55]
Seymour, R.S.; White, A.S.; deMaynadier, P.G. Natural disturbance regimes in northeastern North America—evaluating silvicultural systems using natural scales and frequencies. For. Ecol. Manage. 2002, 155, 357–367.
Staudhammer, C.L.; LeMay, V.M. Introduction and evaluation of possible indices of stand structural diversity. Can. J. For. Res. 2001, 31, 1105–1115.
[58]
Williamson, T.; Colombo, S.; Duinker, P.; Gray, P.; Hennessey, R.; Houle, D.; Johnston, M.; Ogden, A.; Spittlehouse, D. Climate Change and Canada's Forests: Current and Predicted Impacts; SFM Network, University of Alberta: Edmonton, Canada, 2009.
[59]
Brown, V.A.; Harris, J.A.; Russell, J.Y. Tackling Wicked Problems through the Transdisciplinary Imagination; Earthscan: London, UK, 2010.
