Community forestry and related small and medium forest enterprises (SMFEs) can contribute towards the achievement of REDD+ goals, since they can promote sustainable use and conservation of forests and, therefore, a reduction in forest-related carbon emissions. Additionally, they can improve the quality of life of forest-dependant people by generating alternative sources of income and employment. However, SMFEs often face a number of challenges, including non-conducive policy environments, inadequate business skills, and moreover, limited access to financial services. In this paper, we propose to direct a portion of REDD+ readiness efforts towards promoting the generation of an enabling environment for SMFEs that includes: the construction of an adequate Business Environment (BE), the provision of Business Development Services (BDS) and better access to Financial Services (FS). With the application of this framework, SMFEs will be more likely to proliferate and succeed, leading to enhanced community resilience and empowerment, in addition to increasing the likelihood of forest carbon stock permanence and the long term achievement of REDD+ goals. Opportunities and challenges of applying this approach in Latin America are discussed.
References
[1]
Kanninen, M.; Murdiyarso, D.; Seymour, F.; Angelsen, A.; Wunder, S.; german, L. Do Trees Grow On Money? The Implications of Deforestation Research for Policies to Promote REDD; Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR): Bogor, Indonesia, 2007.
[2]
Vatn, A.; Angelsen, A. Options for a national REDD+ architecture. In Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options; Angelsen, A., Ed.; Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR): Bogor, Indonesia, 2009.
[3]
Phelps, J.; Webb, E.; Agrawal, A. Does REDD+ Threaten to Recentralize Forest Governance. Science？2010, 328, 312–313.
[4]
Streck, C.; Gomez-Echeverri, L.; Gutman, P.; Loisel, C.; Werksman, J. REDD+ Institutional Options Assessment: Developing an Efficient, Effective and Equitable Institutional Framework for REDD+ under the UNFCCC; Meridian Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
[5]
Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S.; Kongphan-Apirak, M. Emerging REDD+: A Preliminary Survey of Demonstration and Readiness Activities; enter for International Forestry Research: Bogor, Indonesia, 2009.
[6]
Agrawal, A.; Angelsen, A. Using community forest management to achieve REDD+ goals. In Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options; Angelsen, A., Ed.; Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR): Bogor, Indonesia, 2009.
[7]
UN-REDD Programme. About the UN-REDD Programme, Available online: http://www.un-redd.org/AboutUNREDDProgramme/tabid/583/Default.aspx (accessed on 2 November 2010).
[8]
Skutsch, M.; van Laake, P.; Zahabu, E.; Karky, B.; Phartiyal, P. Community monitoring in REDD+. In Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options; Angelsen, A., Ed.; Centre for International Forestry Research: Bogor, Indonesia, 2009.
[9]
Boscolo, M.; van Dijk, K.; Savenije, H. Financing sustainable small-scale forestry: Issues and lessons from developing national forest financing strategies in Latin America. Forests？2010, 1, 230–249.
[10]
Hajjar, R. Are forest-dependent communities securing legitimate management authority over their forests? Case studies from Brazil and Mexico. XIII IUFRO World Congress, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 23–28 August 2010.
[11]
Gregersen, H.; El Lakany, H.; Karsenty, A.; White, A. Does the opportunity cost approach indicate the real cost of REDD+ Rights and realities of paying for REDD+; Rights and Resources Initiative: Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
[12]
Karsenty, A. The architecture of proposed REDD schemes after Bali: facing critical choices. Int. Forest Rev.？2008, 10, 443–457.
[13]
Benneker, C.; McCall, M. Are existing programs for community based forest management and conservation suitable REDD strategies? A case study from Mexico. EFTRN News？2009, 50, 1–8.
[14]
Bray, D.; Duran, E.; Ramos, V.; Mas, J.; Velazquez, A.; McNab, R.; Barry, D.; Radachowsky, J. Tropical deforestation, community forests, and protected areas in the Maya Forest. Ecol. Soc.？2008, 13, 56.
[15]
Pagdee, A.; Kim, Y.-S.; Daugherty, P.J. What makes community forest management successful: A Meta-Study from community forests throughout the world. Soc. Nat. Resour.？2006, 19, 33–52.
[16]
Scherr, S.; White, A.; Kaimowitz, D. Making markets work for forest communities. Int. Forest Rev.？2003, 5, 67–73.
[17]
Chhatre, A.; Agrawal, A. Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA？2009, 106, 17667–17670.
[18]
Molnar, A.; Liddle, M.; Bracer, C.; Khare, A.; White, A.; Bull, J. Community-Based Forest Enterprises in Tropical Forest Countries: Status and Potential; ITTO, RRI and Forest Trends: Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
[19]
Springate-Baginski, O.; Wollenberg, E. REDD, Forest Governance and Rural Livelihoods: The Emerging Agenda; Centre for International Forestry Research: Bogor, Indonesia, 2010; pp. 1–289.
[20]
Van Dam, C. Indigenous Territories and REDD in Latin America: Opportunity or Threat? Workshop on Forest Governance, Decentralisation and REDD+ in Latin America and the Caribbean, Oaxaca, Mexico, 31 August–3 September 2010.
[21]
Colchester, M. Beyond Tenure: Rights-Based Approaches to Peoples and Forests—Some Lessons from the Forest Peoples Programme; Rights and Resources Initiative: Washington, DC, USA, 2008; pp. 1–52.
[22]
FAO. Tenure Security for Better Forestry: Understanding Forest Tenure in South and Southeast Asia; UN Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2007; pp. 1–14.
[23]
Humphries, S.; Holmes, T.; Kainer, K.; Goncalves Koury, C.G.; Miranda Rocha, R.; Vidal Cruz, E. Are Community-Based Forest Enterprises Economically Viable? Three Cases in the Brazilian Amazon. XIIIth World Forestry Congress, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 18–23 October 2009.
[24]
Medina, G.; Pokorny, B. Avalia？？o Financeira do Manejo Florestal Comunitário; IBAMA/ProManejo: Belém, Brazil, 2008; p. 217.
[25]
Porro, N.; Germana, C.; Lopez, C.; Medina, G.; Ramirez, Y.; Amaral, M.; Amaral, P. Capacidades organizativas para el manejo forestal comunitario frente a las demandas y expectativas oficiales. In Manejo Forestal Comunitario en América Latina: Experiencias, lecciones aprendidas y retos para el futuro; Sabogal, C., de Jong, W., Pokorny, B., Louman, B., Eds.; CIFOR, CATIE: Bogor, Indonesia, 2008.
[26]
Louman, B.; Garcia-Fernandez, C.; Sabogal, C. Capacidades tecnicas y desafios del manejo forestal comunitario. In Manejo Forestal Comunitario en América Latina: Experiencias, lecciones aprendidas y retos para el futuro; Sabogal, C., de Jong, W., Pokorny, B., Louman, B., Eds.; Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR): Bogor, Indonesia, 2008.
[27]
Hajjar, R.; McGrath, D.; Kozak, R.; Innes, J. Zooming out: A holistic approach to addressing community forestry challenges in the Brazilian Amazon. J. Environ. Manage.？2011. submitted.
[28]
Cronkleton, P.; Bray, D.; Medina, G. Community forest management and REDD+ development: Lessons from Mexico, Brazil and Bolivia. Workshop on Forest Governance, Decentralisation and REDD+ in Latin America and the Caribbean, Oaxaca, Mexico, 31 August–3 September 2010.
[29]
Kozak, R. Small and Medium Forest Enterprises—Instruments of Change in the Developing World; Rights and Resources Initiative: Washington, DC, USA, 2007; p. 40.
[30]
Macqueen, D. Supporting Small Forest Enterprises: A Cross-Sectoral Review of Best Practice; International Institute for Environment and Development: London, UK, 2008.
[31]
Osei-Tutu, P.; Nketiah, K.; Kyereh, B.; Owusu-Ansah, M.; Faniyan, J. Hidden Forestry Revealed: Characteristics, Constraints and Opportunities for Small and Medium Forest Enterprises in Ghana. No. 27; Tropenbos International and International Institute for Environment and Development: London, UK, 2010.
[32]
Donovan, J.; Stoian, D.; Macqueen, D.; Grouwels, S. The Business Side of Sustainable Forest Management: Small and Medium Forest Enterprise Development for Poverty Reduction; Overseas Development Institute: London, UK, 2006.
[33]
White, S. Donor Approaches to Improving the Business Environment for Small Enterprises; Working Group on Enabling Environment, Committee of Donor Agencies for Small Enterprise Development: Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
[34]
Beck, T.; Demirguc-Kunt, A. SMEs, Growth, and Poverty: Do Pro-SME Policies Work?; The World Bank Group, Private Sector Development Vice Presidency: Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
[35]
Kambewa, P.; Utila, H. Malawi's Green Gold: Challenges and Opportunities for Small and Medium Forest Enterprises in Reducing Poverty; International Institute for Environment and Development: London, UK, 2008.
[36]
Spears, J. Regional Investment Opportunities, Constraints to Investment and Potential Solutions, Paper included within the report of the Eastern and Southern Africa region forest investment forum, Washington, DC, USA; 2006.
[37]
Mayers, J. Poverty Reduction through Commercial Forestry. What Evidence? What Prospects?; Yale University: New Haven, CT, USA, 2006; p. 32.
[38]
Colchester, M.; Boscolo, M.; Contreras-Hermosilla, A.; Del Gatto, F.; Dempsey, J.; Lescuyer, G.; Obidzinski, K.; Pommier, D.; Richards, M.; Sembiring, S.; Tacconi, T.; Vargas Rios, M.; Wells, A. Justice in the Forest: Rural Livelihoods and Forest Law Enforcement; Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR): Bogor, Indonesia, 2006.
[39]
Larson, A.; Petkova, E. Synergies and opportunities: An introduction to forest governance, people and REDD+ in Latin America. Forests？2011, 2, 86–111.
[40]
Contreras-Hermosilla, A. People, governance and forests: The stumbling blocks in forest governance reform in Latin America. Forests？2011, 2, 168–199.
[41]
Goldmark, L. Beyond Finance: Microfinance and Business Development Services. In An Inside View of Latim American Microfinance; Berger, M., Goldmark, L., Miller-Sanabria, T., Eds.; Inter-American Development Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
[42]
Altenburg, T.; Stamm, A. Towards a More Effective Provision of Business Services; German Development Institute: Bonn, Germany, 2004.
[43]
Spantigati, P.; Springfors, J. Microfinance and Small-Scale Forest-Based Enterprises; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2005.
[44]
Macqueen, D.J. Connecting small enterprises in ways that enhance the lives of forest-dependent people. UNASYLVA-FAO？2007, 58, 26.
[45]
Dampha, A.; Camara, K. Empowering Communities through Forestry: Community-Based Enterprise Development in the Gambia; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2005.
[46]
Lozada, P.; Cendales, M.; Gomez, J.; Becerra, M.; Grouwels, S. Desarrollo empresarial comunitario de biocomercio sostenible en Colombia: Aplicacion de la metodologia analisis y desarrollo de mercado de la FAO; UN Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2006.
[47]
Thoma, W.; Camara, K. Community Forestry Enterprises: A Case Study of the Gambia; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2005.
[48]
Bruni, D.; Grouwels, S. Gambia: Capacity Building in Community-based Forest Enterprises Development TCP/GAM/2904 (T); Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations(FAO): Rome, Italy, 2007; pp. 1–8.
[49]
Helms, B. Access for All: Building Inclusive Financial Systems; World Bank Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
[50]
Auren, R.; Krassowska, K. Small and Medium Forestry Enterprise in Uganda; Forestry Inspection Division, Kampala and International Institute for Environment and Development: London, UK, 2004.
[51]
Junkin, R. Overcoming the barriers to financial services for small-scale forestry: The case of the community forest enterprises of Peten, Guatemala. UNASYLVA？2007, 58, 38.
[52]
Global Microscope on the Microfinance Business Environment 2010; Economist Intelligence Unit: London, UK, 2010.
[53]
Marulanda, B. Downscaling: Moving Latin American Banks into Microfinance. In An Inside View of Latin American Microfinance; Berger, M., Goldmark, L., Miller-Sanabria, T., Eds.; Inter-American Development Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
[54]
Christen, R.; Miller, J. Future Challenges in Latin American Microfinance. In An Inside View of Latin American Microfinance; Berger, M., Goldmark, L., Miller-Sanabria, T., Eds.; Inter-American Development Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
[55]
Colini Cenamo, M.; Nogueira Pavan, M.; Campos, M.; Barros, A.; Carvalho, F. Casebook of REDD Projects in Latin America; The Nature Conservancy and IDESAM: Manaus, Brazil, 2009.
[56]
Viana, V.M.; Grieg-Gran, M.; Della Mea, R.; Ribenboim, G. The costs of REDD: lessons from Amazonas; International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED): London, UK, 2009.
[57]
The World Bank Group. Doing Business: Measuring Business Regulations. Available online: http://www.doingbusiness.org/ (accessed on 25 November 2010).
[58]
Larson, A.; Cronkleton, P.; Barry, D.; Pacheco, P. Tenure Rights and Beyond: Community Access to Forest Resources in Latin America; CIFOR: Bogor, Indonesia, 2008; p. 104.
[59]
Mifflin Bresciani, I. El Mercado de los Servicios de Desarrollo Empresarial para la Pequena Empresa, Subsidio o Rentabilidad? IV Encuentro Latinoamericano de Servicios de Desarrollo Empresarial, Antigua, Guatemala, 10–12 December 2001.
[60]
de Ruijter de Wildt, M. Los Mercados de Servicios de Desarrollo Empresarial y Proveedores Pioneros en América Central; Centro de Estudios para el Desarrollo Rural: San Jose, Costa Rica, 2004.
[61]
Pacheco, P.; Paudel, N. Communities and Forest Markets: Assessing the Benefits from Diverse Forms of Engagement. In Forests for People: Community Rights and Forest Tenure Reform; Larson, A., Barry, D., Dahal, G., Colfer, C., Eds.; Earthscan: London, UK, 2010.
[62]
Miller-Sanabria, T. The Future of Microfinance in Latin America. In An Inside View of Latin American Microfinanc; Berger, M., Goldmark, L., Miller-Sanabria, T., Eds.; Inter-American Development Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
[63]
Larson, A.; Ribot, J. Lessons from forestry decentralisation. In Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options; Angelsen, A., Ed.; Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR): Bogor, Indonesia, 2009.
[64]
Macqueen, D. Building Profitable and Sustainable Community Forest Enterprises: Enabling Conditions; International Institute for Environment and Development: Edinburgh UK, 2010.
[65]
Peskett, L.; Brockhaus, M. When REDD+ goes national: A review of realities, opportunities and challenges. In Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options; Angelsen, A., Ed.; Centre for International Forestry Research: Bogor, Indonesia, 2009.
