Background Current educational strategies to integrate HIV care into primary medical care in Central America have traditionally targeted managers or higher-level officials, rather than local health care workers (HCWs). We developed a complementary online and on-site interactive training program to reach local HCWs at the primary care level in underserved communities. Methods The training program targeted physicians, nurses, and community HCWs with limited access to traditional onsite training in Panama, Nicaragua, Dominican Republic, and Guatemala. The curriculum focused on principles of HIV care and health systems using a tutor-supported blended educational approach of an 8-week online component, a weeklong on-site problem-solving workshop, and individualized project-based interventions. Results Of 258 initially active participants, 225 (225/258 = 87.2%) successfully completed the online component and the top 200 were invited to the on-site workshop. Of those, 170 (170/200 = 85%) attended the on-site workshop. In total, 142 completed all three components, including the project phase. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation instruments included knowledge assessments, reflexive essays, and acceptability surveys. The mean pre and post-essay scores demonstrating understanding of social determinants, health system organization, and integration of HIV services were 70% and 87.5%, respectively, with an increase in knowledge of 17.2% (p<0.001). The mean pre- and post-test scores evaluating clinical knowledge were 70.9% and 90.3%, respectively, with an increase in knowledge of 19.4% (p<0.001). A survey of Likert scale and open-ended questions demonstrated overwhelming participant satisfaction with course content, structure, and effectiveness in improving their HIV-related knowledge and skills. Conclusion This innovative curriculum utilized technology to target HCWs with limited access to educational resources. Participants benefited from technical skills acquired through the process, and could continue working within their underserved communities while participating in the online component and then implement interventions that successfully converted theoretical knowledge to action to improve integration of HIV care into primary care.
References
[1]
Consejo de Ministros de Salud de Centroamérica (2010) Plan estratégico regional de VIH y SIDA de Centroamérica y República Dominicana 2010–2015. Available: http://www.pancap.org/docs/NSP/Dominican?_Republic_2010-2015_0.pdf. Accessed 2012 April 5.
[2]
Pan American Health Organization (2009) Iniciativa regional para la eliminación de la transmisión maternoinfantil del VIH y de la sífilis congénita en América Latina y el Caribe: Documento conceptual. Montevideo: CLAP/SMR. Available: http://new.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=?com_content&view=article&id=1859&Itemid=?1614. Accessed 2012 April 5.
[3]
World Health Organization (2008) Towards universal access: Scaling up priority HIV/AIDS interventions in the health sector – Progress Report 2008. Geneva: WHO Press. Available: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/2008progressr?eport/en/index.html. Accessed 2012 April 5.
[4]
Canchihuaman FA, Garcia PJ, Gloyd SS, Holmes KK (2011) An Interactive internet-based continuing education course on sexually transmitted diseases for physicians and midwives in Peru. PLoS ONE 6(5): e19318.
[5]
Toro PL, Rabkin M, Flam R, El-Sadr W, Donahue M, et al.. (2012) Training multidisciplinary teams to deliver high-quality HIV care to families in resource-limited settings: The MTCT-Plus Initiative experience. J Assoc Nurses AIDS care: Epub ahead of print. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/art?icle/pii/S1055329011002731. Accessed 2012 May 7.
[6]
Pan American Health Organization (2007) Health Systems Profile of Panama. Washington, D.C. Available: http://new.paho.org/hss/index2.php?optio?n=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=10177&Ite?mid=99999999. Accessed 2012 April 5.
[7]
Pan American Health Organization (2007) Health Systems Profile of Guatemala. Washington, D.C. Available: http://new.paho.org/hss/index2.php?optio?n=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=10169&Ite?mid=99999999. Accessed 2012 April 5.
[8]
Pan American Health Organization (2007) Health Systems Profile of Dominican Republic. Washington, D.C. Available: http://new.paho.org/hss/index2.php?optio?n=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=10165&Ite?mid=99999999. Accessed 2012 April 5.
[9]
Pan American Health Organization (2007) Health Systems Profile of Nicaragua. Washington, D.C. Available: http://new.paho.org/hss/index2.php?optio?n=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=10176&Ite?mid=99999999. Accessed 2012 April 5.
[10]
Pan American Health Organization (2005) Llamado a la acción de Toronto - 2006–2015: Una década de recursos humanos en salud para las Américas. VII Regional Meeting of the Observatories of Human Resources in Health, Toronto. Available: http://www.redsalud.gov.cl/portal/url/it?em/59ebd5d5e1db9d63e04001011e012842.pdf. Accessed 2012 April 5.
[11]
Pan American Health Organization (2005) Regional HIV/STI plan for the health sector 2006–2015. Washington, D.C. Available: http://www.paho.org/English/AD/FCH/AI/HI?V_Regional_Plan_2006-2015_ENGLISH.pdf. Accessed 2012 April 5.
[12]
Frank JR, Snell LS, Cate OT, Holmboe ES, Carraccio C, et al. (2010) Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach 32: 638–645.
[13]
SurveyMonkey. Palo Alto, California, USA. Available: www.surveymonkey.com. Accessed 2012 Jan 9.
[14]
Dean AG, Arner TG, Sunki GG, Friedman R, Lantinga M, et al.. (2007) Epi Info?, a database and statistics program for public health professionals Atlanta, Georgia, USA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[15]
Cook DA (2007) Web-based learning: pros, cons and controversies. Clin Med 7(1): 37–42.
[16]
Harden RM (2005) A new vision for distance learning and continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Health Prof 25: 43–51.
[17]
Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, et al. (2008) Internet-based learning in the health professions. JAMA 300: 1181–1196.
[18]
Cook DA, Garside S, Levinson AJ, Dupras DM, Montori VM (2010) What do we mean by web-based learning? A systematic review of the variability of interventions. Med Educ 44: 765–774.
[19]
Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, et al. (2010) Instructional design variations in internet-based learning for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med 85: 909–922.
[20]
Campbell M, Gibson W, Hall A, Richards D, Callery P (2008) Online vs. face-to-face discussion in a web-based research methods course for postgraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Int J Nurs Stud 45: 750–759.
[21]
Murray B (2001) What makes students stay?: Concern over quitters has online programs stepping up retention strategies. eLearn Magazine. Available: http://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?ai?d=566901. Accessed 2012 April 5.
[22]
Rovai AP (2002) Building sense of community at a distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 3(1). Available: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/a?rticle/view/79/152. Accessed 2012 April 5.
[23]
Smith L, Curry M (2005) Twelve tips for supporting online distance learners on medical post-registration courses. Med Teach 27: 396–400.
[24]
Carr S (2000) As Distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. (Cover story). Chron High Educ 46: A39.
[25]
Cook DA, Dupras DM (2004) Teaching on the web: automated online instruction and assessment of residents in an acute care clinic. Med Teach 26: 599–603.
[26]
Chandrasekhar CP, Ghosh J (2001) Information and communication technologies and health in low income countries: the potential and the constraints. Bull World Health Organ 79: 850–855.
[27]
Barczyk J, García J, Casabona J (2010) The potential contribution of small-scale intervention projects in the field to the national health information system for HIV and sexually transmitted infections: a case study of a multilevel intervention in Guatemala. Int J Public Health 55: 693–699.
[28]
Willett LL, Heudebert GR, Palonen KP, Massie FS, Kiefe CI, et al. (2009) The importance of measuring competency-based outcomes: Standard evaluation measures are not surrogates for clinical performance of internal medicine residents. Teach Learn Med 21: 87–93.
[29]
Epstein RM (2007) Assessment in medical education. New Engl J Med 356: 387–396.