T cell activation requires formation of a tri-molecular interaction between a major histocompatibility complex (MHC), peptide, and T cell receptor. In a common model system, the ovalbumin epitope 323–339 binds the murine class II MHC, I-Ad, in at least three distinct registers. The DO11.10 T cell recognizes the least stable of these, as determined by peptide-MHC dissociation rates. Using exogenous peptides and peptide insertions into a carrier protein in combination with IL-2 secretion assays, we show that the alternate registers do not competitively inhibit display of the active register four. In contrast, this weakly binding register is stabilized by the presence of n-terminal flanking residues active in MHC binding. The DO11.10 hybridoma is sensitive to the presence of specific wild-type residues extending to at least the P-3 peptide position. Transfer of the P-4 to P-2 flanking residues to a hen egg lysozyme epitope also presented by I-Ad increases the activity of that epitope substantially. These results illustrate the inherent complexity in delineating the interaction of multiple registers based on traditional thermodynamic measurements and demonstrate the potential of flanking residue modification for increasing the activity of weakly bound epitopes. The latter technique represents an alternative to substitution of anchor residues within a weakly bound register, which we show can significantly decrease the activity of the epitope to a responding T cell.
References
[1]
Rudolph MG, Stanfield RL, Wilson IA (2006) How TCRs bind MHCs, peptides, and coreceptors. Annu Rev Immunol 24: 419–466.
[2]
Castellino F, Zhong G, Germain RN (1997) Antigen presentation by MHC class II molecules: invariant chain function, protein trafficking, and the molecular basis of diverse determinant capture. Hum Immunol 54: 159–169.
[3]
Bordner AJ, Mittelmann HD (2010) Prediction of the binding affinities of peptides to class II MHC using a regularized thermodynamic model. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 41.
[4]
Chang ST, Ghosh D, Kirschner DE, Linderman JJ (2006) Peptide length-based prediction of peptide-MHC class II binding. Bioinformatics 22: 2761–2767.
[5]
Jardetzky TS, Brown JH, Gorga JC, Stern LJ, Urban RG, et al. (1996) Crystallographic analysis of endogenous peptides associated with HLA-DR1 suggests a common, polyproline II-like conformation for bound peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 734–738.
[6]
Nielsen M, Lund O, Buus S, Lundegaard C (2010) MHC class II epitope predictive algorithms. Immunology 130: 319–328.
[7]
Godkin AJ, Davenport MP, Willis A, Jewell DP, Hill AV (1998) Use of complete eluted peptide sequence data from HLA-DR and -DQ molecules to predict T cell epitopes, and the influence of the nonbinding terminal regions of ligands in epitope selection. J Immunol 161: 850–858.
[8]
Godkin AJ, Smith KJ, Willis A, Tejada-Simon MV, Zhang J, et al. (2001) Naturally processed HLA class II peptides reveal highly conserved immunogenic flanking region sequence preferences that reflect antigen processing rather than peptide-MHC interactions. J Immunol 166: 6720–6727.
[9]
Nielsen M, Lundegaard C, Lund O (2007) Prediction of MHC class II binding affinity using SMM-align, a novel stabilization matrix alignment method. BMC Bioinformatics 8: 238.
[10]
Nielsen M, Lund O (2009) NN-align. An artificial neural network-based alignment algorithm for MHC class II peptide binding prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 10: 296.
[11]
Bankovich AJ, Girvin AT, Moesta AK, Garcia KC (2004) Peptide register shifting within the MHC groove: theory becomes reality. Mol Immunol 40: 1033–1039.
[12]
Stadinski BD, Zhang L, Crawford F, Marrack P, Eisenbarth GS, et al. (2010) Diabetogenic T cells recognize insulin bound to IAg7 in an unexpected, weakly binding register. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 10978–10983.
[13]
Seamons A, Sutton J, Bai D, Baird E, Bonn N, et al. (2003) Competition between two MHC binding registers in a single peptide processed from myelin basic protein influences tolerance and susceptibility to autoimmunity. J Exp Med 197: 1391–1397.
[14]
Maverakis E, Beech JT, Schneider S, Sercarz EE (2008) Presentation of a determinant by MHC class II can be prevented through competitive capture by a flanking determinant on a multideterminant peptide. J Autoimmun 31: 59–65.
[15]
Fairchild PJ, Pope H, Wraith DC (1996) The nature of cryptic epitopes within the self-antigen myelin basic protein. Int Immunol 8: 1035–1043.
[16]
Shimonkevitz R, Colon S, Kappler JW, Marrack P, Grey HM (1984) Antigen recognition by H-2-restricted T cells. II. A tryptic ovalbumin peptide that substitutes for processed antigen. J Immunol 133: 2067–2074.
[17]
McFarland BJ, Sant AJ, Lybrand TP, Beeson C (1999) Ovalbumin(323–339) peptide binds to the major histocompatibility complex class II I-A(d) protein using two functionally distinct registers. Biochemistry 38: 16663–16670.
[18]
Robertson JM, Jensen PE, Evavold BD (2000) DO11.10 and OT-II T cells recognize a C-terminal ovalbumin 323–339 epitope. J Immunol 164: 4706–4712.
[19]
Landais E, Romagnoli PA, Corper AL, Shires J, Altman JD, et al. (2009) New design of MHC class II tetramers to accommodate fundamental principles of antigen presentation. J Immunol 183: 7949–7957.
[20]
Nelson CA, Roof RW, McCourt DW, Unanue ER (1992) Identification of the naturally processed form of hen egg white lysozyme bound to the murine major histocompatibility complex class II molecule I-Ak. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89: 7380–7383.
[21]
Lazarski CA, Chaves FA, Jenks SA, Wu S, Richards KA, et al. (2005) The kinetic stability of MHC class II:peptide complexes is a key parameter that dictates immunodominance. Immunity 23: 29–40.
[22]
Scott CA, Peterson PA, Teyton L, Wilson IA (1998) Crystal structures of two I-Ad-peptide complexes reveal that high affinity can be achieved without large anchor residues. Immunity 8: 319–329.
[23]
Weaver JM, Lazarski CA, Richards KA, Chaves FA, Jenks SA, et al. (2008) Immunodominance of CD4 T cells to foreign antigens is peptide intrinsic and independent of molecular context: implications for vaccine design. J Immunol 181: 3039–3048.
[24]
Chaves FA, Richards KA, Torelli A, Wedekind J, Sant AJ (2006) Peptide-binding motifs for the I-Ad MHC class II molecule: alternate pH-dependent binding behavior. Biochemistry 45: 6426–6433.
[25]
Lazarski CA, Chaves FA, Sant AJ (2006) The impact of DM on MHC class II-restricted antigen presentation can be altered by manipulation of MHC-peptide kinetic stability. J Exp Med 203: 1319–1328.
[26]
McFarland BJ, Beeson C (2002) Binding interactions between peptides and proteins of the class II major histocompatibility complex. Med Res Rev 22: 168–203.
[27]
Lovitch SB, Pu Z, Unanue ER (2006) Amino-terminal flanking residues determine the conformation of a peptide-class II MHC complex. J Immunol 176: 2958–2968.
[28]
Busch R, Rinderknecht CH, Roh S, Lee AW, Harding JJ, et al. (2005) Achieving stability through editing and chaperoning: regulation of MHC class II peptide binding and expression. Immunol Rev 207: 242–260.
[29]
Nanda NK, Sant AJ (2000) DM determines the cryptic and immunodominant fate of T cell epitopes. J Exp Med 192: 781–788.
[30]
Vogt AB, Kropshofer H, Hammerling GJ (1997) How HLA-DM affects the peptide repertoire bound to HLA-DR molecules. Hum Immunol 54: 170–179.
[31]
Martineau P, Guillet JG, Leclerc C, Hofnung M (1992) Expression of heterologous peptides at two permissive sites of the MalE protein: antigenicity and immunogenicity of foreign B-cell and T-cell epitopes. Gene 113: 35–46.
[32]
Liang MN, Beeson C, Mason K, McConnell HM (1995) Kinetics of the reactions between the invariant chain (85–99) peptide and proteins of the murine class II MHC. Int Immunol 7: 1397–1404.
[33]
Weaver JM, Sant AJ (2009) Understanding the focused CD4 T cell response to antigen and pathogenic organisms. Immunol Res.
[34]
Dang LH, Lien LL, Benacerraf B, Rock KL (1993) A mutant antigen-presenting cell defective in antigen presentation expresses class II MHC molecules with an altered conformation. J Immunol 150: 4206–4217.
[35]
Russell HI, York IA, Rock KL, Monaco JJ (1999) Class II antigen processing defects in two H2d mouse cell lines are caused by point mutations in the H2-DMa gene. Eur J Immunol 29: 905–911.
[36]
Comeau SR, Gatchell DW, Vajda S, Camacho CJ (2004) ClusPro: a fully automated algorithm for protein-protein docking. Nucleic Acids Res 32: W96–99.
[37]
Levisetti MG, Suri A, Petzold SJ, Unanue ER (2007) The insulin-specific T cells of nonobese diabetic mice recognize a weak MHC-binding segment in more than one form. J Immunol 178: 6051–6057.
[38]
Abiru N, Wegmann D, Kawasaki E, Gottlieb P, Simone E, et al. (2000) Dual overlapping peptides recognized by insulin peptide B:9–23 T cell receptor AV13S3 T cell clones of the NOD mouse. J Autoimmun 14: 231–237.
[39]
Sundberg EJ, Andersen PS, Schlievert PM, Karjalainen K, Mariuzza RA (2003) Structural, energetic, and functional analysis of a protein-protein interface at distinct stages of affinity maturation. Structure 11: 1151–1161.
[40]
Krogsgaard M, Prado N, Adams EJ, He XL, Chow DC, et al. (2003) Evidence that structural rearrangements and/or flexibility during TCR binding can contribute to T cell activation. Mol Cell 12: 1367–1378.
[41]
Wang JH, Meijers R, Xiong Y, Liu JH, Sakihama T, et al. (2001) Crystal structure of the human CD4 N-terminal two-domain fragment complexed to a class II MHC molecule. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 10799–10804.
[42]
Gunther S, Schlundt A, Sticht J, Roske Y, Heinemann U, et al. (2010) Bidirectional binding of invariant chain peptides to an MHC class II molecule. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 22219–22224.
[43]
Kersh GJ, Miley MJ, Nelson CA, Grakoui A, Horvath S, et al. (2001) Structural and functional consequences of altering a peptide MHC anchor residue. J Immunol 166: 3345–3354.
[44]
McBeth C, Seamons A, Pizarro JC, Fleishman SJ, Baker D, et al. (2008) A new twist in TCR diversity revealed by a forbidden alphabeta TCR. J Mol Biol 375: 1306–1319.
[45]
Fremont DH, Hendrickson WA, Marrack P, Kappler J (1996) Structures of an MHC class II molecule with covalently bound single peptides. Science 272: 1001–1004.
[46]
Seibel JL, Wilson N, Kozono H, Marrack P, Kappler JW (1997) Influence of the NH2-terminal amino acid of the T cell receptor alpha chain on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II + peptide recognition. J Exp Med 185: 1919–1927.
[47]
Slansky JE, Rattis FM, Boyd LF, Fahmy T, Jaffee EM, et al. (2000) Enhanced antigen-specific antitumor immunity with altered peptide ligands that stabilize the MHC-peptide-TCR complex. Immunity 13: 529–538.
[48]
Bakker AB, van der Burg SH, Huijbens RJ, Drijfhout JW, Melief CJ, et al. (1997) Analogues of CTL epitopes with improved MHC class-I binding capacity elicit anti-melanoma CTL recognizing the wild-type epitope. Int J Cancer 70: 302–309.
[49]
Valmori D, Fonteneau JF, Valitutti S, Gervois N, Dunbar R, et al. (1999) Optimal activation of tumor-reactive T cells by selected antigenic peptide analogues. Int Immunol 11: 1971–1980.
Overwijk WW, Tsung A, Irvine KR, Parkhurst MR, Goletz TJ, et al. (1998) gp100/pmel 17 is a murine tumor rejection antigen: induction of “self”-reactive, tumoricidal T cells using high-affinity, altered peptide ligand. J Exp Med 188: 277–286.
[52]
Parkhurst MR, Salgaller ML, Southwood S, Robbins PF, Sette A, et al. (1996) Improved induction of melanoma-reactive CTL with peptides from the melanoma antigen gp100 modified at HLA-A*0201-binding residues. J Immunol 157: 2539–2548.
[53]
Gervois N, Guilloux Y, Diez E, Jotereau F (1996) Suboptimal activation of melanoma infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) due to low avidity of TCR/MHC-tumor peptide interactions. J Exp Med 183: 2403–2407.
[54]
Kersh GJ, Kersh EN, Fremont DH, Allen PM (1998) High- and low-potency ligands with similar affinities for the TCR: the importance of kinetics in TCR signaling. Immunity 9: 817–826.
[55]
Cole DK, Edwards ES, Wynn KK, Clement M, Miles JJ, et al. (2010) Modification of MHC anchor residues generates heteroclitic peptides that alter TCR binding and T cell recognition. J Immunol 185: 2600–2610.
[56]
Jiang W, Boder ET (2010) High-throughput engineering and analysis of peptide binding to class II MHC. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 13258–13263.
