全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2012 

Testing the Effects of an Introduced Palm on a Riparian Invertebrate Community in Southern California

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042460

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Despite the iconic association of palms with semi-arid regions, most are introduced and can invade natural areas. Along the San Diego River (San Diego, California, USA), the introduced Canary Island date palm (Phoenix canariensis) forms dense patches among native riparian shrubs like arroyo willow (Salix lasiolepis). The structural differences between the palm and native shrubs are visually obvious, but little is known about palm’s effects on the ecosystem. We tested for the effects of the palm on a riparian invertebrate community in June 2011 by comparing the faunal and environmental variables associated with palm and willow canopies, trunks and ground beneath each species. The palm invertebrate community had lower abundance and diversity, fewer taxa feeding on the host (e.g., specialized hemipterans), and more taxa likely using only the plant’s physical structure (e.g., web-builders, oak moths, willow hemipterans). There were no observed effects on the ground-dwelling fauna. Faunal differences were due to the physical and trophic changes associated with palm presence, namely increased canopy density, unpalatable leaves, trunk rugosity, and litter accumulations. Palm presence and resulting community shifts may have further ecosystem-level effects through alteration of physical properties, food, and structural resources. These results were consistent with a recent study of invasive palm effects on desert spring arthropods, illustrating that effects may be relatively generalizable. Since spread of the palm is largely localized, but effects are dramatic where it does occur, we recommend combining our results with several further investigations in order to prioritize management decisions.

References

[1]  Zona S (2008) The horticultural history of the Canary Island date palm (Phoenix canariensis). Garden History 36: 301–309.
[2]  Cal-IPC (2006) California Invasive Plant Inventory. Cal-IPC Publication 2006–02. Berkeley, CA: California Invasive Plant Council. Available: http://www.cal-ipc.org. Accessed 2012 Feb 6..
[3]  Holmquist JG, Schmidt-Gengenbach J, Slaton MR (2011) Influence of invasive palms on terrestrial arthropod assemblages in desert spring habitat. Biological Conservation 144: 518–525.
[4]  Burkhart B, Kelly M (2005) Which weeds dominate southern California urban riparian systems? California Invasive Plant Council News 13: 4–5, 12.
[5]  Gilman EF, Watson DG(2009) Phoenix canariensis: Canary Island Date Palm. University of Florida IFAS Extension. Available: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/st439. Accessed 8 February 2012.
[6]  Cornett JW (1987) Naturalized populations of the desert fan palm, Washingtonia filifera, in Death Valley National Monument. In: Hall CA Jr, Doyle-Jones V (Eds). White Mountain Research Station Symposium: Plant Biology of Eastern California, Vol 2. Los Angeles: White Mountain Research Station. 167–174.
[7]  Cornett JW (2010) Desert Palm Oasis. Nature Trails Press, Palm Springs, CA.
[8]  Hood WG, Naiman RJ (2000) Vulnerability of riparian zones to invasion by exotic vascular plants. Plant Ecology 148: 105–114.
[9]  Trent H, Seymour J (2010) Examining California’s first palm tree: The Serra palm. The Journal of San Diego History 56: 105–120.
[10]  Tuck R (2012) History of the Canary Island date palm in California. Sunset Palms. Available: http://www.sunsetpalms.net/information.p?hp?go=4. Accessed 12 February 2012..
[11]  Kelly M (2007) Why palms made it into the Inventory. California Invasive Plant Council News 15: 4, 13, 15.
[12]  Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council (2009) List of Invasive Plant Species. Wildland Weeds 12: 13–116.
[13]  Wu L, Dodge?L (2005) Landscape Plant Salt Tolerance Selection Guide for Recycled Water Irrigation. A Special Report for the Elvenia J Slosson Endowment Fund, University of California, Davis article. 40.
[14]  Tanji KK, Rollins L, Suyama P, Farris C (2007) Choose salt-tolerant plants. Salinity Management Guide. WateReuse Foundation. Available: http://www.salinitymanagement.org/Salini?ty%20Management%20Guide/cp/cp_7_table-3.?html. Accessed 2012 Feb 12..
[15]  San Diego River Park Master Plan (2010) City of San Diego. Available: http://www.sandiego.gov/planning/program?s/parkplanning/pdf/sdriverparkpdf/sdrpma?sterplanbodyfull.pdf. Accessed 2012 Feb 6..
[16]  Talley TS, Levin LA (2001) Modification of sediments and macrofauna by an invasive marsh plant. Biological Invasions 3: 51–68.
[17]  Whitcraft CR, Levin LA, Talley D, Crooks JA (2008) Utilization of invasive tamarisk by salt marsh consumers. Oecologia 158: 259–272.
[18]  Zuefle ME, Brown WP, Tallamy DW (2008) Effects of non-native plants on the native insect community of Delaware. Biological Invasions 10: 1159–1169.
[19]  Hickman JC (1993) The Jepson Manual. Higher plants of California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
[20]  Lopez-Llorca LV, Carbonell T, Salinas J (1999) Colonization of plant waste substrates by entomopathogenic and mycoparasitic fungi - a SEM study. Micron 30: 325–333.
[21]  Strong DR, Lawton JH, Southwood TRE (1984) Insects on Plants: Community Patterns and Mechanisms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[22]  Pearson DE (2009) Invasive plant architecture alters trophic interactions by changing predator abundance and behavior. Oecologia 159: 549–558.
[23]  Schowalter TD (2011) Insect Ecology: An Ecosystem Approach, 3rd ed. San Diego, CA: Elsevier. 650 p..
[24]  Buffington ML, Radak RA (1998) A comparison of vacuum sampling versus sweep-netting for arthropod biodiversity measurements in California coastal sage scrub. Journal of Insect Conservation 2: 99–106.
[25]  Zar JH (2009) Biostatistical Analysis, 5th ed. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall. 960 p..
[26]  Clarke KR, Warwick RM(2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2d ed. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.
[27]  Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18: 117–143.
[28]  Ward PS (1987) Distribution of the introduced Argentine ant (Iridomyrmex humilis) in natural habitats of the lower Sacramento Valley and its effects on the indigenous ant fauna. Hilgardia 55: 1–16.
[29]  Gomez-Vidal S, Lopez-Llorca LV, Jansson H-B, Salinas J (2006) Endophytic colonization of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) leaves by entomopathogenic fungi. Micron 37: 624–632.
[30]  Triplehorn CA, Johnson NF (2005) Borror and DeLong’s Introduction to the Study of Insects, 7th ed. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing. 864 p.
[31]  Powell JA, Hogue CL(1979) California Insects. Los Angeles: University of California Press. 388 p.
[32]  Nadkarni NM (1994) Diversity of species and interactions in the upper tree canopy of forest ecosystems. American Zoologist 34: 70–78.
[33]  Humphrey JW, Hawes C, Peace AJ, Ferris-Kaan R, Jukes MR (1998) Relationships between insect diversity and habitat characteristics in plantation forests. Forest Ecology and Management 113: 11–21.
[34]  Siemann E, Tilman D, Haarstad J, Ritchie M (1998) Experimental tests of the dependence of arthropod diversity on plant diversity. American Naturalist 152: 738–750.
[35]  Keer G, Zedler JB (2002) Salt marsh canopy architecture differs with the number and composition of species. Ecological Applications 12: 456–473.
[36]  Sawyer JO, Keeler-Wolf T (1995) A Manual of California Vegetation. Sacramento, CA: California Native Plant Society.
[37]  Uetz GW (1979) The influence of variation in litter habitats on spider communities. Oecologia 40: 29–42.
[38]  Bultman TL, Uetz GW (1984) Effect of Structure and Nutritional Quality of Litter on Abundances of Litter-dwelling Arthropods. American Midland Naturalist 111: 165–172.
[39]  Spence JR, Niemel? JK (1994) Sampling carabid assemblages with pitfall traps: The madness and the method. The Canadian Entomologist 126: 881–894.
[40]  Work TT, Buddle CM, Korinus LM, Spence JR (2002) Pitfall trap size and capture of three taxa of litter-dwelling arthropods: Implications for biodiversity studies. Environmental Entomology 31: 438–448.
[41]  Hancock MH, Legg CJ (2011) Pitfall trapping bias and arthropod body mass. Insect Conservation and Diversity. doi: 10.1111/j.1752–4598.2011.00162.x.
[42]  Doyle AT (1990) Use of riparian and upland habitats by small mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 71: 14–23.
[43]  Vitt LJ, Caldwell JP (1994) Resource utilization and guild structure of small vertebrates in the Amazon forest leaf litter. Journal of Zoology 234: 463–476.
[44]  Dennis P, Young MR, Gordon IJ (1998) Distribution and abundance of small insects and arachnids in relation to structural heterogenetiy of grazed, indigenous grasslands. Ecological Entomology 23: 253–264.
[45]  Senior K (2010) Seabirds boycott Palmyra’s palms. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8: 62.
[46]  Chapin EA (1925) Food habits of the vireos. U S Department of Agriculture Bulletin 1355. Washington, DC: USDA.
[47]  Bent AC (1950) Life histories of North American wagtails, shrikes, vireos, and their allies. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 197. New York: Dover Publications.
[48]  Gaines DA (1977) The valley riparian forests of California: Their importance to bird populations. In: Anne Sands, ed Riparian forests in California: Their ecology and conservation. University of California, Davis, Inst of Ecol Publ No 15: 57–87.
[49]  Olson TE, Gray MV (1989) Characteristics of least Bell’s vireo nest sites along the Santa Ynez River. In: Abell DL, editor. Proceedings of the California Riparian Systems Conference: protection, management, and restoration for the 1990s; September 22–24; Davis, CA. Gen Tech Rep PSW-110. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, USDA. 278–284.
[50]  Kus B (2002) Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus). In: The Riparian Bird Conservation Plan: a strategy for reversing the decline of riparian-associated birds in California. Stinson Beack, CA: California Partners in Flight. Available: http://www.prbo.org/calpif/htmldocs/spec?ies/riparian/least_bell_vireo.htm. Accessed 2012 Feb 18..
[51]  Miner KL (1989) Foraging ecology of the Least Bell’s Vireo, Vireo bellii pusillus. Master’s thesis, San Diego State University.
[52]  Svenning JC (2002) Non-native ornamental palms invade a secondary tropical forest in Panama. Palms: Invasive Palms in Panama 46(2): 1–3.
[53]  MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[54]  Fleishman E, Ray C, Sjogren-Gulve P, Boggs CL, Murphy DD (2002) Assessing the roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics. Conservation Biology 16: 706–716.
[55]  Fleishman E, Murphy DD, Sada DW (2006) Effects of environmental heterogeneity and disturbance on the native and non-native flora of desert springs. Biological Invasions 8: 1091–1101.
[56]  Perla BS, Stevens LE (2008) Biodiversity and productivity at an undisturbed spring in comparison with adjacent grazed riparian and upland habitats. In: Stevens LE, Meretsky VJ, editors. Aridland Springs in North America: Ecology and Conservation. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press. 230–243.
[57]  Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CR, Wu J, et al. (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319: 756–760.
[58]  Hastings A, Byers JE, Crooks JA, Cuddington K, Jones CG, et al. (2007) Ecosystem engineering in space and time. Ecology Letters 10: 153–164.
[59]  Hobbs RJ, Humphries SE (1995) An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conservation Biology 9: 761–770.
[60]  Crooks JA (2005) Lag times and exotic species: the ecology and management of biological invasions in slow motion. Ecoscience 12: 316–329.
[61]  Reichard SH, White P (2001) Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States. Bioscience 51: 103–113.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133