The aortic heart valve undergoes geometric and mechanical changes over time. The cusps of a normal, healthy valve thicken and become less extensible over time. In the disease calcific aortic stenosis (CAS), calcified nodules progressively stiffen the cusps. The local mechanical changes in the cusps, due to either normal aging or pathological processes, affect overall function of the valve. In this paper, we propose a computational model for the aging aortic valve that connects local changes to overall valve function. We extend a previous model for the healthy valve to describe aging. To model normal/uncomplicated aging, leaflet thickness and extensibility are varied versus age according to experimental data. To model calcification, initial sites are defined and a simple growth law is assumed. The nodules then grow over time, so that the area of calcification increases from one model to the next model representing greater age. Overall valve function is recorded for each individual model to yield a single simulation of valve function over time. This simulation is the first theoretical tool to describe the temporal behavior of aortic valve calcification. The ability to better understand and predict disease progression will aid in design and timing of patient treatments for CAS.
References
[1]
Sahasakul Y, Edwards WD, Naessens JM, Tajik AJ (1988) Age-related changes in aortic and mitral valve thickness: implications for two-dimensional echocardiography based on an autopsy study of 200 normal human hearts. American Journal of Cardiology 62: 424–430.
[2]
Christie GW, Barrattboyes BG (1995) Age-dependent changes in the radial stretch of human aortic-valve leaflets determined by biaxial testing. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 60: S156–S159.
[3]
Cowell SJ, Newby DE, Boon NA, Elder AT (2004) Calcific aortic stenosis: same old story? Age and Ageing 33: 538–544.
[4]
Kuusisto J, Rasanen K, Sarkioja T, Alarakkola E, Kosma V (2005) Atherosclerosis-like lesions of the aortic valve are common in adults of all ages: a necropsy study. Heart 91: 576–582.
[5]
Schoen F, Edwards M (2001) Valvular heart disease: General principles and stenosis. In: Silver M, Gotlieb AI, Schoen F, editors. Cardiovascular Pathology 3rd Ed. WB Saunders. pp. 402–442.
[6]
Schoen F (2001) Pathology of heart valve substitution with mechanical and tissue prostheses. In: Silver M, Gotlieb AI, Schoen F, editors. Cardiovascular Pathology 3rd Ed. WB Saunders. pp. 629–677.
[7]
Yacoub N, Takkenberg J (2005) Will heart valve tissue engineering change the world? Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine 2: 60–61.
[8]
Faggiano P, Ghizzoni G, Sorgato A, Sabatini T, Simoncelli U, et al. (1992) Rate of progression of valvular aortic-stenosis in adults. American Journal of Cardiology 70: 229–233.
[9]
Antonini-Canterin F, Erlicher A, Cervesato E, Piazza R, Faggiano P, et al. (2002) The rate of hemodynamic progression is strongly predictive of clinical outcome mostly in mild and moderate aortic stenosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 39: 419A–420A.
[10]
Antonini-Canterin F, Faggiano P, Zanuttini D, Ribichini F (1999) Is aortic valve resistance more clinically meaningful than valve area in aortic stenosis? Heart 82: 9–10.
[11]
Ford LE, Feldman T, Chiu YC, Carroll JD (1990) Hemodynamic resistances as a measure of functional impairment in aortic valvular stenosis. Circulation Research 66: 1–7.
[12]
Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC, Faxon DP, et al. (2006) ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. Circulation 114: E84–E231.
[13]
Bermejo J, Odreman R, Feijoo J, Moreno MM, Gomez-Moreno P, et al. (2003) Clinical efficacy of Doppler-echocardiographic indices of aortic valve stenosis: A comparative test-based analysis of outcome. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 41: 142–151.
[14]
VanAuker MD (2006) Age-related changes in hemodynamics affecting valve performance. American Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 15: 277–283.
[15]
Piper C, Bergemann R, Schulte HD, Koerfer R, Horstkotte D (2003) Can progression of valvar aortic stenosis be predicted accurately? Annals of Thoracic Surgery 76: 676–680.
[16]
Kizer J, Gefter W, deLemos A (2001) Electron beam computed tomography for quantification of aortic valvular calcification. Journal of Heart Valve Disease 2001: 548–555.
[17]
Rosenhek R, Rader F, Loho N, Gabriel H, Heger M, et al. (2004) Statins but not ACE-inhibitors delay aortic stenosis progression. European Heart Journal 25: 250–250.
[18]
Weinberg EJ, Kaazempur Mofrad MR (2007) Transient, three-dimensional, multiscale simulations of the human aortic valve. Cardiovascular Engineering 7: 140–155.
[19]
Otto CM (2003) Valvular heart disease, edition 2. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
[20]
Weinberg EJ, Kaazempur-Mofrad M (2008) A multiscale computational comparison of the bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves in relation to calcific aortic stenosis. Journal of Biomechanics 41: 3482–3487.
[21]
Rajamannan NM, Subramaniam M, Springett M, Sebo T, Niekrasz M, et al. (2002) Atorvastatin inhibits hypercholesterolemia-induced cellular proliferation and bone matrix production in the rabbit aortic valve. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology 22: A22–A22.
[22]
Rajamannan NM, Sangiorgi GM, Arnold K, Mohacsi TG, Carlson PJ, et al. (1998) Apoptosis is markedly increased in the aortic valves from rabbits on hypercholesterolemic diets. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 31: 3A–3A.
[23]
Thubrikar M (1990) The Aortic Valve. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
[24]
Grande-Allen K, Cochran R, Reinhall P, Kunzelman K (2001) Finite-element analysis of aortic valve sparing: influence of graft shape and stiffness. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 48: 647–659.
[25]
Hallquist J (2006) LS-DYNA Theory Manual. Livermore.
[26]
Thubrikar MJ, Nolan SP, Aouad J, Deck JD (1986) Stress sharing between the sinus and leaflets of canine aortic valve. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 42: 434–440.
[27]
Simmons C, Grant G, Manduchi E, Davies P (2005) Spatial heterogeneity of endothelial phenotypes correlates with side-specific vulnerability to calcification in normal porcine aortic valves. Circulation Research 96: 792–799.
[28]
Blais C, Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Garcia D, Chen DM, et al. (2001) Comparison of valve resistance with effective orifice area regarding flow dependence. American Journal of Cardiology 88: 45–52.
[29]
Garcia D, Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Sakr F, Durand LG (2000) Assessment of aortic valve stenosis severity - A new index based on the energy loss concept. Circulation 101: 765–771.
[30]
Lester SJ, McElhinney DB, Miller JP, Lutz JT, Otto CM, et al. (2000) Rate of change in aortic valve area during a cardiac cycle can predict the rate of hemodynamic progression of aortic stenosis. Circulation 101: 1947–1952.
[31]
Gorlin R (1987) Calculations of cardiac-valve stenosis - restoring an old concept for advanced applications. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 10: 920–922.
