Background Developing control policies for zoonotic diseases is challenging, both because of the complex spread dynamics exhibited by these diseases, and because of the need for implementing complex multi-species surveillance and control efforts using limited resources. Mathematical models, and in particular network models, of disease spread are promising as tools for control-policy design, because they can provide comprehensive quantitative representations of disease transmission. Methodology/Principal Findings A layered dynamical network model for the transmission and control of zoonotic diseases is introduced as a tool for analyzing disease spread and designing cost-effective surveillance and control. The model development is achieved using brucellosis transmission among wildlife, cattle herds, and human sub-populations in an agricultural system as a case study. Precisely, a model that tracks infection counts in interacting animal herds of multiple species (e.g., cattle herds and groups of wildlife for brucellosis) and in human subpopulations is introduced. The model is then abstracted to a form that permits comprehensive targeted design of multiple control capabilities as well as model identification from data. Next, techniques are developed for such quantitative design of control policies (that are directed to both the animal and human populations), and for model identification from snapshot and time-course data, by drawing on recent results in the network control community. Conclusions/Significance The modeling approach is shown to provide quantitative insight into comprehensive control policies for zoonotic diseases, and in turn to permit policy design for mitigation of these diseases. For the brucellosis-transmission example in particular, numerous insights are obtained regarding the optimal distribution of resources among available control capabilities (e.g., vaccination, surveillance and culling, pasteurization of milk) and points in the spread network (e.g., transhumance vs. sedentary herds). In addition, a preliminary identification of the network model for brucellosis is achieved using historical data, and the robustness of the obtained model is demonstrated. As a whole, our results indicate that network modeling can aid in designing control policies for zoonotic diseases.
References
[1]
(2006) The control of neglected zoonotic diseases: a route to poverty elimination, Report: WHO/SDE/FOS 2006.1.
[2]
Zinsstag J, Schelling E, Roth F, Bonfou D, de Savigny D, et al. (2007) Human benefits of animal interventions for zoonosis control. Emerg Infect Diseases 13: 527–531. doi: 10.3201/eid1304.060381
[3]
Roth F, Zinsstag J, Orkhon D, Chimed-Ochir G, Hutton G, et al. (2003) Human health benefits from livestock vaccination for brucellosis: case study. Bull World Health Org 81: 867–883.
[4]
Zinsstag J, Roth F, Orkhon D, Chimed-Ochir G, Nansalmaa N, et al. (2005) A model of animal-human brucellosis transmission in Mongolia. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 69: 77–95. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.01.017
[5]
Gonzalez-Guzman J, Naulin R (1994) Analysis of a model of bovine brucellosis using singular perturbations. Jour Math Biol 33: 211–223. doi: 10.1007/BF00160180
[6]
Riley S, Frasier C, Donnelly CA (2003) Transmission dynamics of the etiological agent of SARS in Hong Kong: impact of public health interventions. Science 300: 1961–1966. doi: 10.1126/science.1086478
[7]
Salathe M, Jones J (2010) Dynamics and control of diseases with community structure. PLoS Comp Bio 6: 4.
[8]
Adams B, Kapan DD (2010) Man bites mosquito: the contribution of human movement to vector-borne disease dynamics. PLoS One 4: e6763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006763
[9]
Keeling MJ, Rohani P (2008) Modeling Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals. Princton University Press: Princeton, NJ.
[10]
Grassly NC, Fraser C (2008) Mathematical models of infectious disease transmission. Nat Rev Microb 6: 477–487.
[11]
Galvani AP, May RM (2005) Epidemiology: dimensions of superspreading. Nat 438: 293–295. doi: 10.1038/438293a
[12]
Kilpatrick AM, Daszak P, Jones MJ, Marra PP, Kramer LD (2006) Host heterogeneity dominates West Nile virus transmission. Proc Roy Soc B 22: 2327–2333. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3575
[13]
Diekmann O, Heesterbeck JAP, Metz JAJ (1990) On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations. Jour Math Biol 28: 365–382. doi: 10.1007/BF00178324
[14]
Wan Y, Roy S, Saberi A (2008) Designing spatially-heterogeneous strategies for control of virus spread. IET Sys Biol 2: 184–201. doi: 10.1049/iet-syb:20070040
[15]
Wan Y, Roy S, Saberi A (2008) A new focus in the science of networks: toward methods for design. Proc Roy Soc A 464: 513–535. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2007.0050
[16]
(2006) Brucellosis in Humans and Animals, Report: WHO/CDS/EPR 2006–7.
[17]
Berhe G, Belihu K, Asfaw Y (2007) Seroepidemiological investigation of bovine brucellosis in the extensive cattle production system of Tigray region of Ethiopia. Int Jour App Res Vet Med 5: 2007.
[18]
Smits HL, Cutler SJ (2004) Application of biotechnology to the control and prevention of brucellosis in Africa. Af Jour Biotech 3: 631–636.
[19]
(1998) Human and Animal Brucellosis: Epidemiological Surveillance in the MZCP Countries, Workshop Report, Damascus, Syria.
[20]
Rugh W (1995) Linear System Theory, Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
[21]
Roy S, Saberi A, Stoorvogel A (2007) Toward a control theory for networks, editorial in the Int Jour Rob Nonlin Cont. Special Issue on Communicating-Agent Networks 17: 897.
[22]
Baillieul J, Antsaklis PJ (2007) Control and communication challenges in networked real-time systems. Proc IEEE 95: 9–28. doi: 10.1109/jproc.2006.887290
Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393: 440–442. doi: 10.1038/30918
[25]
Wu CW, Chua LO (1995) Application of Kronecker products to the analysis of systems with uniform linear coupling. IEEE Trans Circ Sys I 42: 775–779. doi: 10.1109/81.473586
[26]
Roy S, Wan Y, Saberi A (2009) A network control theory approach to virus-spread mitigation,” Proc 2009 IEEE Int Conf Tech Home Sec, Boston, MA.
[27]
Wang X, Wan Y, Roy S, Saberi A (2010) A deliberate-delay control scheme for virus-spread mitigation in the multi-group SIR model, Proc. 2010 Conf Decision Control (submitted).
[28]
Wilkinson J (1965) The Algebraic Eigenvalue Problem, Clarendon Press: Oxford.
[29]
Roy S, Saberi A (2007) Scaling: a canonical design problem for networks. Int Jour Cont 80: 1342–1353. doi: 10.1080/00207170701355069
[30]
Wan Y, Roy S, Saberi A, Stoorvogel A (2010) A multiple-derivative and multiple-delay paradigm for decentralized controller design: uniform-rank Systems, Int Jour Contin Discr Impuls Sys, Special Issue in Honor of Hassan Khalil's 60th Birthday (accepted).
[31]
Peterson MJ, Grant WE, Davis DS (1992) Bison-brucellosis management: simulation of alternative strategies. Jour Wild Manage 55: 205–213.
[32]
Peterson MJ, Grant WE, Davis DS (1991) Simulation of host-parasite interactions within a resource-management framework. Eco Model 54: 299–320. doi: 10.1016/0304-3800(91)90081-b
[33]
Unger F, Munstermann S, Goumou A, Apia CN, Konte M, et al. (2006) Risk associated with bovine brucellosis in selected study herds and market places in four countries of West Africa. Animal Health Working Paper No. 2. ITC (International Trypanotolerance Centre), Banjul, The Gambia, 37.
[34]
Ljung L (1987) System Identification–Theory for the User, Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs NJ.
[35]
Wan Y, Roy S (2009) On Inference of Network Time Constants from Impulse Response Data: Graph-Theoretic Cramer-Rao Bounds, Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Shanghai, China.
[36]
Elderd BD, Dukic VM, Dwyer G15693–15697, 2006. “Uncertainty in predictions of disease spread and public health responses to bioterrorism,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 103, no. 42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600816103
