Background In 2004 Niger established a large scale schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths control programme targeting children aged 5–14 years and adults. In two years 4.3 million treatments were delivered in 40 districts using school based and community distribution. Method and Findings Four districts were surveyed in 2006 to estimate the economic cost per district, per treatment and per schistosomiasis infection averted. The study compares the costs of treatment at start up and in a subsequent year, identifies the allocation of costs by activity, input and organisation, and assesses the cost of treatment. The cost of delivery provided by teachers is compared to cost of delivery by community distributers (CDD). The total economic cost of the programme including programmatic, national and local government costs and international support in four study districts, over two years, was US$ 456,718; an economic cost/treatment of $0.58. The full economic delivery cost of school based treatment in 2005/06 was $0.76, and for community distribution was $0.46. Including only the programme costs the figures are $0.47 and $0.41 respectively. Differences at sub-district are more marked. This is partly explained by the fact that a CDD treats 5.8 people for every one treated in school. The range in cost effectiveness for both direct and direct and indirect treatments is quantified and the need to develop and refine such estimates is emphasised. Conclusions The relative cost effectiveness of school and community delivery differs by country according to the composition of the population treated, the numbers targeted and treated at school and in the community, the cost and frequency of training teachers and CDDs. Options analysis of technical and implementation alternatives including a financial analysis should form part of the programme design process.
References
[1]
Canning D (2006) Priority setting and the ‘neglected’ tropical diseases. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 100: 499–504. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.02.001
[2]
Montresor A, Gabrielli AF, Diarra A, Engels D (2010) Estimation of the cost of large scale deworming programmes with benzimidazoles. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 104: 129–132. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2009.10.007
[3]
Walker D, Fox-Rushby J (2000) Economic evaluation of parasitic diseases: A critique of the internal and external validity of published studies. Tropical Medicine and International Health 5/4: 237–249. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2000.00546.x
[4]
Gabrielli AF, Touré S, Sellin B, Sellin E, Ky C, et al. (2006) A combined school- and community-based campaign targeting all school-age children of Burkina Faso against schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis: Performance, financial costs and implications for sustainability. Acta Tropica 99: 234–242. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2006.08.008
[5]
Brooker S, Kabatereine NB, Fleming F, Devlin N (2008) Cost and cost-effectiveness of nationwide school-based helminth control in Uganda: intra-country variation and effects of scaling-up. Health Policy and Planning 23: 24–35. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czm041
[6]
The Partnership for Child Development (1999) The cost of large-scale school health programmes which deliver anthelmintics to children in Ghana and Tanzania. Acta Tropica 73: 183–204. doi: 10.1016/S0001-706X(99)00028-5
[7]
Huseinl MH, Talaat M, El-Sayed MK, El-Badawi A, Evans DB (1996) Who misses out with school-based health programmes? A study of schistosomiasis control in Egypt Transactions Of The Royal Society Of Tropical Medicine And Hygiene 90: 362–26. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(96)90506-4
[8]
Talaat M, Evans DB (2000) The costs and coverage of a strategy to control schistosomiasis morbidity in non-enrolled school-age children in Egypt. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 94(4): 449–54. doi: 10.1016/S0035-9203(00)90137-8
[9]
Guyatt H, Evans D, Lengeler C, Tanner M (1994) Controlling schistosomiasis: the cost-effectiveness of alternative delivery strategies. Health Policy Plan 9(4): 385–95. doi: 10.1093/heapol/9.4.385
[10]
Fenwick A, Webster JP, Bosque-Oliva E, Blair L, Fleming F, et al. (2009) The Schistosomiasis Control Initiative (SCI): rationale, development and implementation from 2002–2008. Parasitology 136: 1719–1730. doi: 10.1017/S0031182009990400
[11]
Garba A, Touré S, Dembelé R, Bosque-Oliva E, Fenwick A (2006) Implementation of national schistosomiasis control programmes in West Africa. TRENDS in Parasitology 22(7): 322. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2006.04.007
[12]
Frost LJ, Reich MR (2008) Access: How do good health technologies get to poor people in poor countries? HCPDS, chapter 3: 46. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2011.594074
[13]
Jamison DT, et al., editor. (2006) Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. Oxford University Press and The World Bank.
[14]
Montresor A, Crompton DWT, Hall A, Bundy DAP, Savioli L (1998) Guidelines For The Evaluation Of Soil-Transmitted Helminthiasis And Schistosomiasis At Community Level. WHO/CTD/SIP/98.1.
[15]
Touré S, Zhang Y, Bosqué-Oliva E, Ky C, Ouedraogo A, et al. (2008) Two-year impact of single praziquantel treatment on infection in the national control programme on schistosomiasis in Burkina Faso. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 86(10). doi: 10.2471/blt.07.048694
[16]
French MD, Churcher TS, Gambhir M, Fenwick A, Webster JP, et al. (2010) Observed Reductions in Schistosoma mansoni Transmission from Large-Scale Administration of Praziquantel in Uganda: A Mathematical Modelling Study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4(11): e897. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000897.
[17]
Anderson RM, May RM (2005) Infectious Diseases of Human Dynamics and Control. Oxford University Press. pp. 435–456.
[18]
Miguel E, Kremer M (2004) Worms: identifying impacts on education and health in the presence of treatment externalities. Econometrica 72: 159–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00481.x
[19]
Nwaorgu OC, Okeibnos J, Madu E, Amazingo U, Onyegegbu N (1998) School based schistosomiasis and intestinal helminthiasis control programme in Nigeria: acceptability to community members. Tropical Medicine and International Health 3(1): 842–849. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.1998.00313.x
[20]
Massa K, Olsen A, Sheshe A, Ntakamulenga R, Ndawi B, et al. (2009) Can coverage of schistosomiasis and soil transmitted helminthiasis control programmes targeting school-aged children be improved? New approaches Parasitology 136: 1781–1788. doi: 10.1017/s0031182008000474
[21]
Ndyomugyenyi R, Kabatereine N (2003) Integrated community-directed treatment for the control of onchocerciasis, schistosomiasis and intestinal helminth infections in Uganda: advantages and disadvantages. Tropical Medicine and International Health 8(11): 997–1004. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-2276.2003.01124.x
[22]
Audibert M, Etard JF (1998) Impact of Schistosomiasis on Rice Output and Farm Inputs in Mali. Journal Of African Economies 7(2): 185–207. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jae.a020948
[23]
Umeh JC, Amali O, Umeh EU (2004) The socio-economic effects of tropical diseases in Nigeria. Economics and Human Biology 2: 245–263. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2004.04.001
