%0 Journal Article
%T A comparison of hand-assisted and pure laparoscopic techniques in live donor nephrectomy
%A Branco
%A Anibal Wood
%A Kondo
%A William
%A Branco Filho
%A Alcides Jos¨¦
%A George
%A Marco Aur¨¦lio de
%A Rangel
%A Marlon
%A Stunitz
%A Luciano Carneiro
%J Clinics
%D 2008
%I Faculdade de Medicina / USP
%R 10.1590/S1807-59322008000600015
%X purpose: to compare hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy techniques in live donor nephrectomy. methods: in this retrospective study, we included all patients submitted to hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy between may 2002 and december 2007. the operative data and post-operative courses were reviewed. information was collected on the operative time, warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss, intra-operative complications, time to first oral intake, length of hospital stay, and post-operative complications. the data were analyzed using student's t -tests and fisher exact tests as appropriate, with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05. results: the means of the operative duration, warm ischemia time and intra-operative bleeding were 83 min, 3.6 min and 130.9 cc, respectively, for hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, and 78.4 min, 2.5 min and 98.9 cc, respectively, for pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (p=0.29, p<0.0001 and p=0.08, respectively). intra-operative complications occurred in 6% of patients submitted to hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and in 4.5% of those submitted to pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (p=0.68). only one patient from each group required conversion to open surgery; one person receiving hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy had bleeding and one person receiving pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy had low carbon dioxide levels during the warm ischemia period. compared with patients receiving hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, patients submitted to pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy were able to take their first meal earlier (12.5 vs. 9.2 hours, p=0.046), were discharged home sooner (2.8 vs. 1.4 days, p<0.0001) and had fewer post-operative complications (7.5% vs. 0.6%, p=0.04). conclusions: pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy had some advantages over hand-assisted
%K laparoscopy
%K nephrectomy
%K kidney transplantation
%K living donor
%K hand-assisted.
%U http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1807-59322008000600015&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en