%0 Journal Article
%T 恩格斯《反杜林论》与列宁《哲学笔记》辩证法体系的差异
The Dialectic System Difference between Engels’ “Anti-Duhring” and Lenin’s “Philosophical Notes”
%A 于佳莉
%J Advances in Philosophy
%P 223-230
%@ 2169-2602
%D 2025
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/acpp.2025.146313
%X 在马克思主义哲学的发展过程中，恩格斯的《反杜林论》与列宁的《哲学笔记》有着巨大的研究价值。本文通过分析《反杜林论》和《哲学笔记》的写作背景与核心思想，整理、比较它们在写作内容、体系等方面的不同，探究这两本书辩证法体系的差异，挖掘这些差异产生的根源，探讨对当代哲学研究的启示。有助于深化我们对马克思主义辩证法的理解，更好地明确马克思主义辩证法的内涵和理论体系，为深入研究马克思主义发展史提供理论依据。
In the development process of Marxist philosophy, Engels’ “Anti-Duhring” and Lenin’s “Philosophical Notes” have great research value. This article analyzes the writing background and core ideas of “Anti-Duhring” and “Philosophical Notes”, sorts out and compares their differences in writing content, systems, etc., explores the differences in the dialectical systems of these two books, excavates the root causes of these differences, and discusses the inspirations for contemporary philosophical research. It is conducive to deepening our understanding of Marxist dialectics, better clarifying the connotation and theoretical system of Marxist dialectics, and providing a theoretical basis for in-depth research on the development history of Marxism.
%K 马克思主义哲学，
%K 辩证法，
%K 《反杜林论》，
%K 《哲学笔记》
Marxist Philosophy
%K Dialectics
%K “
%K Anti-Duhring”
%K “
%K Philosophical Notes”
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=118387