%0 Journal Article
%T 民事非法证据排除规则的适用与完善
Application and Improvement of Civil Illegal Evidence Exclusion Rules
%A 刘训红
%J Interdisciplinary Science Letters
%P 282-290
%@ 2574-416X
%D 2025
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/isl.2025.93036
%X 在民事诉讼中，证据关涉着案件事实能否得到公正审理，排除非法证据也成为了不可忽视的一环。虽然我国民事诉讼中对于非法证据排除规则的规定已经逐渐完善，但当前仍在实体规范层面缺少对相关概念的准确界定、取证方式认定不一以及法院适用积极性不高等情况，一定程度上影响着民事诉讼非法证据排除规则的发展。通过对司法实践的查阅，挖掘出当前问题产生的原因主要在于实体规范和程序规范的模糊与缺省，以及长久以来大部分司法实践中对实质正义高于程序正义的追求。基于此，对于以上提出的问题进行针对性解决，提出一系列切实的举措，以期探索出非法证据排除规则在民事诉讼领域适用的调整方向。
In civil litigation, evidence is related to whether the facts of the case can be fairly heard, and the exclusion of illegal evidence has also become a link that cannot be ignored. Although China’s civil litigation for illegal evidence exclusion rules has been gradually perfected, but the current entity norms in the level of the lack of accurate definition of relevant concepts, evidence collection method of identification of inconsistent and the court application of the enthusiasm is not high and so on, to a certain extent, affecting the development of civil litigation illegal evidence exclusion rules. Through the review of judicial practice, the reasons for the current problems mainly lie in the ambiguity and omission of substantive and procedural norms, as well as the pursuit of substantive justice over procedural justice in most judicial practices for a long time. Based on this, the above problems are targeted to solve, and put forward a series of practical measures, in order to explore the illegal evidence exclusion rules in the field of civil litigation in the direction of adjustment.
%K 非法证据排除，
%K 民事诉讼，
%K 适用规则
Exclusion of Unlawful Evidence
%K Common Plea
%K Applicable Rules
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=113558