%0 Journal Article
%T TOE框架下上市公司共同富裕实现路径的组态研究
A Configurational Study on the Realization Path of Common Prosperity for Listed Companies under the TOE Framework
%A 江沁睿
%J E-Commerce Letters
%P 913-925
%@ 2168-5851
%D 2025
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/ecl.2025.144968
%X 本文基于“技术–组织–环境”TOE框架，研究上市公司共同富裕实现的组态路径，运用模糊集定性比较分析法，探究影响我国上市公司共同富裕的因素之间的联动关系。厘清促进上市公司共同富裕的路径。通过研究表明，存在“智能–技术融合型”、“智能–治理融合型”、“技术–专业融合型”、“技术–治理融合型”、“组织维度变动型”、“相对均衡发展型”6条高共同富裕实现路径，其中，“技术–治理融合型”覆盖度最高。而上市公司非高共同富裕具有4条组态路径，并且与上市公司高共同富裕发展路径存在非对称关系，为管理实践提供学理性支撑。
Based on the “Technology-Organization-Environment” (TOE) framework, this paper studies the configurational paths for the realization of common prosperity of listed companies. By using the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis method, it explores the linkage relationships among the factors influencing the common prosperity of listed companies in China, and clarifies the paths to promote the common prosperity of listed companies. The research shows that there are six high common prosperity realization paths, namely the “Intelligence-Technology Integration Type”, the “Intelligence-Governance Integration Type”, the “Technology-Professionalism Integration Type”, the “Technology-Governance Integration Type”, the “Organizational Dimension Change Type”, and the “Relatively Balanced Development Type”. Among them, the “Technology-Governance Integration Type” has the highest coverage. In addition, there are four configurational paths for listed companies with non-high common prosperity, and there is an asymmetric relationship between these paths and the high common prosperity development paths of listed companies, providing theoretical support for management practices.
%K 上市公司，
%K 组态路径，
%K 定性比较分析法
Listed Companies
%K Configuration Path
%K Qualitative Comparative Analysis Method
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=111768