%0 Journal Article
%T 《洛阳伽蓝记》文化负载词英译识解对比<br>A Comparative Study of Construal in English Translation of Culture-Loaded Words in <i>Luoyang Qielan Ji</i>
%A 张灿灿
%J Modern Linguistics
%P 148-157
%@ 2330-1716
%D 2025
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/ml.2025.134327
%X 本文以《洛阳伽蓝记&#183;第一卷》文化负载词的英译为研究对象&#65292;对比分析王伊同与Jenner的译本。研究发现&#65292;两位译者识解方式不同&#65292;产生了不同的翻译风格。王伊同以异化策略为主导&#65292;通过直译、意译与注释等相结合的方法&#65292;实现与原文相似的细颗粒度描写&#65292;对原文文化负载词的聚焦对象作出调整&#65292;突显不同侧面&#65292;灵活调整句式结构和叙述视角。Jenner则以读者接受为导向&#65292;采用意译、音译加注与增译等方法&#65292;通过粗颗粒度描写降低读者认知负荷&#65292;突显文化负载词的多个侧面&#65292;显化其隐含语义&#65292;并克制对原文句式的调整以维持其叙事意图。<br>This study conducts a comparative analysis of the English translations of culture-loaded words in <i>Luoyang Qielan Ji</i> (<i>Volume I</i>) by Yitong Wang and Jenner. The findings reveal that the divergent construal approaches adopted by the two translators engendered distinct translation styles. Yitong Wang predominantly adopts a foreignization-oriented strategy, integrating literal translation, free translation, and annotated explanations to achieve fine-grained representation that approximates the source text. He adjusts the focus of culture-loaded words, foregrounds different profiles, and dynamically modifies syntactic structures and narrative perspectives. In contrast, Jenner prioritizes reader accessibility, employing free translation, transliteration with annotations, and addition to constructing coarse-grained representations. This approach reduces the cognitive load on readers by highlighting multiple implicit profiles of culture-loaded words and explicating their connotative meanings while minimizing syntactic alterations to retain the original narrative intentionality.
%K 《洛阳伽蓝记》&#65292
%K 文化负载词&#65292
%K 识解&#65292
%K 翻译&#65292
%K 译者<br><i>Luoyang Qielan Ji</i>
%K Culture-Loaded Words
%K Construal
%K Translation
%K Translator
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=111344