%0 Journal Article
%T 论司法解释的效力与性质
On the Effect and Nature of Judicial Interpretation
%A 徐春昊
%J Dispute Settlement
%P 80-86
%@ 2379-3104
%D 2025
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/ds.2025.114131
%X 本文探讨了我国司法解释的效力与性质，分析了其在法律理论与实践中存在的矛盾与争议。文章首先回应了“司法解释立法化”的批判，从实证主义角度论证了司法解释的立法性质及其正当性，指出司法解释的权力来源于立法机关的转授权。其次，文章讨论了司法解释的法源地位和效力位阶，认为其应被视为法律渊源，并在不与法律抵触时与法律具有同等效力。最后，文章从程序瑕疵和立法中心主义两个视角对现行司法解释制度提出批评，指出其在程序严谨性和司法独立性方面的不足，并对未来司法解释制度的改革提出了展望。
This paper discusses the effectiveness and nature of judicial interpretation in our country, and analyzes its contradictions and disputes in the legal theory and practice. At first, the article responds to the criticism of “legalization of judicial interpretation”, demonstrates the legislative nature and legitimacy of judicial interpretation from the perspective of positivism, and points out that the power of judicial interpretation comes from the delegation of the legislature. Secondly, the article discusses the legal source status and effectiveness of judicial interpretation, and holds that it should be regarded as the legal source and have the same effect as the law when it does not conflict with the law. Finally, the article criticizes the current judicial interpretation system from the two perspectives of procedural defects and legislative centralism, points out its deficiencies in procedural rigor and judicial independence, and puts forward prospects for the reform of judicial interpretation system in the future.
%K 司法解释，
%K 法源地位，
%K 效力位阶，
%K 立法中心主义
Judicial Interpretation
%K Legal Source Status
%K Effective Rank
%K Legislative Centralism
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=110561