%0 Journal Article %T 广东省城市高质量发展水平评估及其提升策略
Evaluation of High-Quality Development Levels in Guangdong Province Cities and Its Enhancement %A 黄欣华 %J Geographical Science Research %P 72-80 %@ 2168-5770 %D 2025 %I Hans Publishing %R 10.12677/gser.2025.141009 %X 城市是高质量发展的主要载体，对城市高质量发展水平进行评估有利于推动新型城镇化持续健康发展。本研究基于高质量发展内涵，从共享、开放、绿色、协调、创新五个方面构建评价指标体系，利用熵权TOPSIS法，计算2010~2020年广东省各地级市高质量发展综合得分，探究广东省城市高质量发展水平的时空演变特征。研究结果表明：(1) 广东省经济高质量发展水平整体呈现逐年上升的趋势，经历了波动下降和缓慢推进两个阶段，发展势头较好；(2) 广东省在开放发展和创新发展方面表现突出，绿色发展和协调发展有提升空间；(3) 广东省城市高质量发展水平具有非均衡发展特征，空间上呈现珠三角地区较高，粤东西北地区较低的分布特征。
Cities are the primary carriers of high-quality development, and assessing the level of urban high-quality development is conducive to promoting the sustainable and healthy development of new urbanization. This study, based on the connotation of high-quality development, constructs an evaluation index system from five aspects: sharing, openness, green development, coordination, and innovation. Using the entropy weight TOPSIS method, the study calculates the comprehensive scores of high-quality development for various prefecture-level cities in Guangdong Province from 2010 to 2020, and explores the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of urban high-quality development in Guangdong Province. The research results indicate: (1) The level of high-quality economic development in Guangdong Province generally shows an upward trend year by year, having experienced two stages of fluctuating decline and slow progress, with a good development momentum; (2) Guangdong Province stands out in terms of open development and innovative development, while there is room for improvement in green development and coordinated development; (3) There is an unbalanced development characteristic in the level of high-quality development among cities in Guangdong Province, with a spatial distribution feature of higher levels in the Pearl River Delta region and lower levels in the eastern, western, and northern regions of Guangdong. %K 高质量发展， %K 熵权法， %K 评价指标体系， %K 广东省， %K 差异分析
High-Quality Development %K Entropy Weight Method %K Evaluation Index System %K Guangdong Province %K Difference Analysis %U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=108058