%0 Journal Article
%T 盗窃罪数额认识错误的性质廓清与规则重构
Clarification of the Nature and Establishment of Rules for the Misunderstanding of Amount in Larceny
%A 孙怡欣
%J Open Journal of Legal Science
%P 26-31
%@ 2329-7379
%D 2025
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/ojls.2025.131005
%X 我国刑法对盗窃罪采用“定性 + 定量”的立法模式，其基本数额属于犯罪构成要件要素，加重数额是一种独立的法定刑升格条件，二者均属主观故意的认识内容。将构成犯罪的数额误以为是不构成犯罪的数额，属于阻却犯罪故意型数额认识错误，也称消极的错误；基本数额与加重数额之间的认识错误则属于具体的事实认识错误中的对象错误。在数额认识错误的认定标准上，应限缩适用“外行人领域的平行判断”原则，只能用该原则来排除而不能证成行为人的犯罪故意。数额认识错误案件的具体数额认定上应坚持责任主义原则，行为人只对有责的不法承担责任。
The legislation of larceny in our criminal law is both qualitative and quantitative. The basic amount of larceny is an element of the crime constitution, and the increased amount is a kind of independent penalty upgrading condition, both need to be recognized. Mistaking the amount which constitutes a crime as the amount not constituting a crime is a misunderstanding that prevents the intention of crime, also be referred to as a “negative mistake”. The misunderstanding between the based amount and the increased amount is the object error in the concrete fact cognition error. In the identification standard of the misunderstanding of the amount, it proposes to apply the principle of “parallel judgment in layman’s field” in a limited way, that is, to exclude rather than to prove the criminal intent. The principle of responsibility should be adhered to in the determination of the specific amount, and the perpetrator should only bear the responsibility for the intentional act.
%K 盗窃罪，
%K 数额认识错误，
%K 对象错误，
%K 责任主义原则
Larceny
%K Misunderstanding of the Amount
%K Object Error
%K Principle of Responsibility
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=104720