%0 Journal Article
%T 浅析《民法典》中“自甘风险”规则
A Brief Analysis of the Rule of “Self Assumption of Risk” in the “Civil Code”
%A 姚琳静
%J Open Journal of Legal Science
%P 7150-7155
%@ 2329-7379
%D 2024
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/ojls.2024.12121015
%X 《民法典》中第一千一百七十六条规定了“自甘风险”规则，为我国侵权责任案件提供了民法依据，完善了我国侵权责任制度框架，但是在司法实践中却存在着定义模糊、适用范围不明确等问题亟待解决。因此，本文分析了“自甘风险”规则的四个构成要素，并将其与与有过失、受害人同意两方面的类似概念进行对比区分，最后针对“自甘风险”规则在司法实践中出现的问题提出了精准定义概念、规定特别法以及加强立法三个方面的建议，以期从实践层面建立更为公平公正的文体活动环境，从理论层面为司法及《民法典》责任编提供参考。
Article 1176 of the “Civil Code” stipulates the rule of “self assumption of risk”, providing a civil law basis for China’s tort liability cases and improving the framework of China’s tort liability system. However, there are still problems in judicial practice such as vague definitions and unclear scope of application that urgently need to be solved. Therefore, this article analyzes the four constituent elements of the “self assumption of risk” rule and compares and distinguishes it with similar concepts such as fault and victim consent. Finally, it proposes three suggestions for the problems that arise in the judicial practice of the “self assumption of risk” rule: precise definition of the concept, provision of special laws, and strengthening legislation. The aim is to establish a more fair and just cultural and sports activity environment from a practical perspective, and provide reference for the judiciary and the responsibility section of the “Civil Code” from a theoretical perspective.
%K 《民法典》，
%K 自甘风险，
%K 侵权责任
“
%K Civil Code”
%K Self Acceptance of Risk
%K Tort Liability
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=103294