%0 Journal Article
%T 附条件不起诉制度的多元化立法思路——中德附条件不起诉制度比较研究
The Diversified Legislative Path of the Conditional Non-Prosecution System—Comparative Study on the Conditional Non-Prosecution System between China and Germany
%A 李开元
%J Open Journal of Legal Science
%P 6884-6890
%@ 2329-7379
%D 2024
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/ojls.2024.1212978
%X 轻罪时代，我国司法资源配置应当如何转变成为轻罪诉讼制度体系建立的重点问题。在刑事案件进入刑事审判流程之前，似乎缺少一项更为折中的制度，为检察机关在诉与不诉之间提供灵活选择。因此，本文通过分析我国未成年人附条件不起诉制度的实践经验和成年人轻罪附条件不起诉制度的试点经验，明确我国附条件不起诉制度的立法现状，再通过对比德国附条件不起诉制度的“多元化”立法思路，为我国建立“广义上的附条件不起诉制度”提出建议。
In the era of minor offenses, how to transform the allocation of judicial resources in China is a key issue in establishing a minor offense litigation system. Before criminal cases enter the criminal trial process, there seems to be a lack of a more compromise system that provides flexible choices for the procuratorial organs between prosecution and non-prosecution. Therefore, this article analyzes the practical experience of the conditional non prosecution system for minors in China and the pilot experience of the conditional non prosecution system for minor offenses, clarifies the legislative status of the conditional non prosecution system in China, and then compares the “diversified” legislative ideas of the conditional non prosecution system in Germany to provide suggestions for establishing a “broad conditional non prosecution system” in China.
%K 附条件不起诉制度，
%K 多元化立法，
%K 审前分流，
%K 比较研究
Conditional Non-Prosecution System
%K Diversified Legislation
%K Pre-Trial Diversion
%K Comparative Study
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=102369