%0 Journal Article
%T 论中国离婚损害赔偿制度
On the System of Divorce Damage Compensation in China
%A 林珏佩
%A 奉珊宇
%J Open Journal of Legal Science
%P 6691-6696
%@ 2329-7379
%D 2024
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/ojls.2024.1211949
%X 《婚姻法》第46条规定了离婚损害赔偿制度，在一定程度上能够达到保护无过错方的目的。随着《民法典》出台，离婚损害赔偿制度更加完善，第1091条在原有基础上新增了“其他重大过错”这一兜底性的规定，从而可以将一些其他过错行为纳入损害赔偿的范围，但在实践中，该条款的增设对离婚损害赔偿制度的使用效果并不能立竿见影，仍然存在着无过错方举证困难、离婚损害赔偿数额不确定、因果关系认定困难、责任主体单一的缺陷。基于此，本文将从离婚损害赔偿制度的制度目的出发，具体分析离婚损害赔偿制度适用困难的缺陷，并提出应当完善离婚损害赔偿制度的举证责任、合理确定离婚损害赔偿数额标准、对因果关系采用推定原则、扩大赔偿主体范围，以期为该制度的实际应用提供参考。
The 46th article in China’s marriage law regulates the divorce damage compensation system, which has played its role in protecting the no-fault party. In the wake of its publication, the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China improved the divorce damage compensation system in that the 1091st article, a miscellaneous clause, regulates other gross negligence and is able to embrace other negligence for damage compensation. However, the very article has not been as much as effective in its practical uses because of the defects such as the difficulties for the no-fault party to put to the proof, the uncertain amount of divorce damage compensation, the standard of affirming the causal relationship and the singleness of subjects of responsibility. Therefore, this paper from the purpose of the divorce damage compensation system analyzed specifically the defects of applying the system of divorce damage compensation and suggested bettering the system for putting to the proof, reasonably setting the amount of divorce damage compensation, applying the principle of presumption to causal relationship and extending the scope of subjects of responsibility so that it can serve as a reference for the practice of the system of divorce damage compensation.
%K 离婚损害赔偿制度，
%K 重大过错，
%K 因果关系
Divorce Damage Compensation System
%K Gross Negligence
%K Causal Relationship
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=101427