%0 Journal Article
%T 福柯和哈贝马斯的理论之争
The Theoretical Dispute between Foucault and Habermas
%A 陈美华
%J Advances in Philosophy
%P 2981-2986
%@ 2169-2602
%D 2024
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/acpp.2024.1311440
%X 上个世纪80年代以来，福柯的理论和哈贝马斯的理论一直存在着争议，福柯的思想来源及其学说相异于哈贝马斯，这两个人在西方马克思主义仍享有极大的影响力。不同于福柯从权力这一切入点出发诊断社会，哈贝马斯从理性这一出发点对社会状况进行了探讨。两者探讨社会的出发点不一样，结论也不同。对西方的启蒙运动和启蒙理性的评价不同，各自诊断社会的路径不同，得出的态度和答案肯定也不一样。从总体来看，他们在理论上的差异主要体现在社会权力理论的差异、对谱系学的态度差异、交往理论的差异。
Since the 1980s, Foucault’s theory and Habermas’s theory have been in dispute. Foucault’s inheritance thought source and theory are different from Habermas’s, and these two people still enjoy great influence in Western Marxism. On the whole, their theoretical differences are mainly reflected in the difference of social power theory, the difference of attitude to genealogy, and the difference of communication theory. Different from Foucault’s diagnosis of society from the point of power, Habermas discusses the social situation from the point of reason. The starting point of the discussion of society is different, and the conclusion is different. The evaluation of the Enlightenment movement and enlightenment reason in the West is different, and their paths of diagnosing society are different, and their attitudes and answers are definitely different.
%K 福柯，
%K 哈贝马斯权力理论，
%K 谱系学，
%K 交往理论
Foucault
%K Habermas Power Theory
%K Genealogy
%K Communication Theory
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=100822