%0 Journal Article
%T 重新仲裁制度探究
Exploration of the Re-Arbitration System
%A 孟宪浩
%J Open Journal of Legal Science
%P 5229-5234
%@ 2329-7379
%D 2024
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/ojls.2024.128744
%X 在当前司法实践中,重新仲裁制度可以有效减轻当事人的诉讼负担,缓解司法压力,但是我国的重新仲裁制度还有很大不足,重新仲裁制度主要适用于实体问题,对于程序性问题关注较少,并且重新仲裁与仲裁裁决的终局性和既判力相矛盾,重新仲裁的启动主体与审理主体过于单一。重新仲裁制度应当适用于程序瑕疵,而非实体争议,要发挥撤销仲裁的积极作用,化解重新仲裁与仲裁裁决的终局性和既判力的矛盾,通过规范重新仲裁的启动主体和审理主体,明确重新仲裁的主体,来完善重新仲裁程序,为法院提供合理、具体、可操作的适用思路。
In the current judicial practice, the re-arbitration system can effectively reduce the litigation burden of the parties and alleviate the judicial pressure, but there are still great deficiencies in China’s re-arbitration system, which is mainly applicable to substantive issues, and pays less attention to procedural issues, and the re-arbitration contradicts the finality and res judicata of the arbitral award, and the initiation of re-arbitration and the subject of the trial are too single. The re-arbitration system should be applied to procedural defects rather than substantive disputes, and should play a positive role in revoking arbitration, resolve the contradiction between the finality and res judicata between re-arbitration and arbitral awards, and improve the re-arbitration procedure by standardizing the initiation and hearing subjects of re-arbitration, and clarifying the subject of re-arbitration, so as to provide the courts with reasonable, specific and actionable application ideas.
%K 重新仲裁,
%K 终局性,
%K 既判力,
%K 撤销仲裁裁决
Re-Arbitration
%K Finality
%K Res Judicata
%K Setting Aside Arbitral Award
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=94558