%0 Journal Article
%T 刑法构成要件要素的类型化——以刑事指导性案例参照制度为切入点<br>Typology of Constituent Elements of Criminal Law—Taking the Criminal Guidance Case Reference System as an Entry Point
%A 郑常绿
%A 刘静
%A 俞玥
%A 邓江玉
%J Open Journal of Legal Science
%P 3473-3483
%@ 2329-7379
%D 2024
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/ojls.2024.125493
%X 立足于指导性制度案例走入司法的背景，为解决目前刑事指导性案例参照制度的困境，尝试通过“刑法构成要件要素类型化”来解除我国法官运用指导性案例时对于罪刑法定原则的顾虑，重新认识刑事指导性案例参照制度天然的类比推理属性及其合理性所在，厘清与罪刑法定原则之间的界限，协助我国司法人员再认识类比推理：运用类型化的构成要件要素以识别类案，促进我国刑事指导性案例的准确司法应用。希冀在刑法构成要件要素类型化的作用下，推动刑法各罪名要素更为清晰，刑法体系更加融洽。<br />
Based on the background of the guiding system of cases into the judicial system, in order to solve the current dilemma of the criminal guiding case reference system, try to explore the “typology of criminal law constituent elements” to relieve the judges of China’s guiding cases of the principle of the law of crime and punishment, and to re-conceptualise the guiding case reference system. Analogical reasoning attributes and its rationality, clarify the boundaries with the principle of the law of punishment and crime, to assist our judicial personnel to re-understand the analogical reasoning: to grasp the guiding cases and pending cases with the typed constituent elements, so as to identify the analogous cases, and to promote the accurate judicial application of China’s criminal guiding cases. It is hoped that under the effect of typology of criminal law constituent elements, the elements of criminal law will be promoted to be clearer and the criminal law system will be more harmonious.
%K 构成要件，要素类型化，事物本质，刑事指导性案例，类比推理<br>Constituent Elements
%K Typology
%K Nature of Things
%K Criminal Guiding Cases
%K Analogical Reasoning
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=88641