%0 Journal Article
%T 中国社会的法律思想与儒家伦理思想的比较研究——以曾亦《儒家伦理与中国社会》、瞿同祖《中国法律与中国社会》为例<br>A Comparative Study of Legal Thought and Confucian Ethics in Chinese Society—Taking Zeng’s <i>Confucian Ethics and Chinese Society</i> and Qu Tongzu’s <i>Chinese Law and Chinese Society</i> as Examples
%A 陈博
%J Advances in Philosophy
%P 969-973
%@ 2169-2602
%D 2024
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/acpp.2024.135145
%X 在深入探讨中国社会中法律思想与儒家伦理思想的相互作用与深远影响的过程中，通过对曾亦和瞿同祖的著作进行详细的比较分析，研究发现，尽管两位学者在理论框架与观点细节上存在差异，他们的研究均凸显了中国法律思想与儒家伦理思想之间深层的联系与相互渗透。这种联系不仅体现在法律的道德化倾向和“以人为本”的法治理念上，也体现在儒家伦理对社会治理和人际关系的深刻影响上。研究不仅为理解中国传统法律文化提供了新的视角，也对深化当前中国法治与道德建设的相关讨论提供了理论依据和历史经验。因此，强调了在研究中国社会法律与伦理问题时，需全面考虑法律思想与儒家伦理思想的综合作用，及其对当代中国法治社会建设的启示。<br />
In the process of deeply exploring the interaction and profound impact of legal thought and Confucian ethical thought in Chinese society, through a detailed comparative analysis of the works of Zeng Yi and Qu Tongzu, the study found that despite differences in theoretical frameworks and details of views between the two scholars. Their research highlighted the deep connection and mutual penetration between Chinese legal thought and Confucian ethical thought. This connection is not only reflected in the moralization tendency of the law and the “people-oriented” legal governance concept but also in the profound impact of Confucian ethics on social governance and interpersonal relationships. The research not only provides a new perspective for understanding traditional Chinese legal culture but also offers a theoretical basis and historical experience for deepening the discussion on the current legal and moral construction in China. Therefore, it emphasizes the need to comprehensively consider the combined effect of legal thought and Confucian ethical thought in the study of legal and ethical issues in Chinese society, and its implications for the construction of a legal society in contemporary China.
%K 中国社会，法律思想，儒家伦理思想，比较研究<br>Chinese Society
%K Legal Thought
%K Confucian Ethics
%K Comparative Research
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=87694