%0 Journal Article
%T 婚姻家庭领域人身安全保护令的司法适用研究——以233份司法实践案例为样本分析<br>Research on Judicial Application of Personal Safety Protection Order in Marriage and Family Field—Taking 233 Judicial Practice Cases as Analyzed Samples
%A 王盼莹
%J Open Journal of Legal Science
%P 3019-3027
%@ 2329-7379
%D 2024
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/ojls.2024.125429
%X 近年来，人身安全保护令制度得到广泛应用，但仍存在一些困境，如何正确理解并适用人身安全保护令制度是当前亟待解决的问题。以233份婚姻家庭领域人身安全保护令的实践案例为样本，对其司法适用进行研究，通过对案件裁判数量、地域分布情况、案件事实证明方式、案件申请类型和审理结果以及违反人身安全保护令的惩罚措施等数据进行分析，探讨人身安全保护令的运行现状以及人民法院对于人身安全保护令的裁判态度，从而发现人身安全保护令在司法裁判中存在的问题：申请人举证困难、救济措施不健全、违反保护令的惩戒力度不够等。针对以上问题，可从以下几个方面进行完善：合理分配举证责任、完善保护令的救济措施、加大违反保护令的惩处力度。<br />
In recent years, the personal safety protection order system has been widely used, but there are still some difficulties, how to correctly understand and apply the personal safety protection order system is an urgent problem to be solved. 233 practical cases of personal safety protection orders in the field of marriage and family were taken as samples to study their judicial application, and data such as the number of cases adjudication, geographical distribution, methods of proving case facts, types of case applications and trial results, and punishment measures for violating personal safety protection orders were analyzed. This paper discusses the current situation of personal safety protection order and the attitude of people’s court to judge personal safety protection order, so as to find out the problems existing in judicial judgment of personal safety protection order: the applicant is difficult to prove, the relief measures are not perfect, and the punishment for violating the protection order is not strong enough. In view of the above problems, it can be improved from the following aspects: reasonable distribution of the burden of proof, improving the relief measures of the protection order, and increasing the punishment for violating the protection order.
%K 人身安全保护令，反家庭暴力法，司法适用，证据规则<br>Personal Safety Order
%K Anti-Domestic Violence Law
%K Judicial Application
%K Rules of Evidence
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=87109